- [Christina] So inside of my Facebook group,
build math minds,
there are a lot and I mean a lot of posts,
all about, asking opinions
around a certain curriculum or textbook.
Basically like wanting to find out,
is this a good curriculum.
Is this a good textbook series?
I'm Christina Tondevold,
the recovering traditionalist.
And so today I wanted to spend a few moments
talking about what is
the best math curriculum that's out there.
I hope you'll join me
as we try and build our math minds.
So we can build the math minds of our students.
Now I'm gonna start off with the answer
you probably do not want to hear.
There is no best math curriculum.
Yes I'm saying it.
There are definitely ones that
I personally like more than others.
But my teaching style is different
from your teaching style.
And I know this makes it super difficult
when you have a school of lots of teachers
all with a different philosophies
about math education and teaching styles.
Because even if you all have the same philosophy
about how math should be taught,
our style of teaching is different.
And curriculums or textbook series,
I'm gonna go back and forth between both of those.
Just because they go, I don't know,
to me they are the same thing.
You can tell me in the comments,
how and if they should be different.
But curriculum, textbook series,
you'll hear me say both.
So I'm gonna tell you straight off.
There will be no best curriculum.
There's probably one that you will like
more than another.
But there's no way that you district
is going to adopt a curriculum
that makes everybody happy.
Okay?
It's just not gonna be possible.
So I want to talk about
two things in particular,
that I personally like to look at
when I'm helping districts evaluate curriculum.
The first one is looking to see
if there's more of an emphasis
on conceptual understanding
or procedural understanding.
Now here's the deal.
If you've seen my previous videos
and probably pretty much any of them,
I talk about we really need a balance of both.
There are different philosophies
and math education about,
we should teach procedural first
and then bring in the conceptual.
Other people believe we should do
conceptual first
and then practice the procedural afterwards.
And there are still some who say nope,
the emphasis should be on procedural
and there are others who say
the emphasis should be on conceptual,
not so much on the procedural.
So there are textbook series that adopt
any, that go any of those ways.
So I want you to be mindful,
of when you get a series,
look to see how they are
balancing conceptual and procedural.
And I can pretty much guarantee you,
there isn't one that has
a wonderful balance of both.
You will find curriculums
that tend to be more conceptual
and they don't have as much practice in procedural
skill based stuff in them.
You'll find a camp that is
more procedural with little
to no conceptual building.
Alright?
So it's not to say that any like,
as you've hear before, I want some of both
but textbooks don't necessarily
have the best balance of those.
So whatever it is that gets adopted.
If you're a part of that adoption,
that's a piece I would want to be looking at.
If you get a textbook
after it's already been adopted.
That's what I want you to look at.
Where is this textbook
having most of its emphasis?
If it has a really strong emphasis on
conceptual building, then you've got to
be able to bring in the procedural stuff.
Vice versa, if it's more procedural,
I want you to be
finding conceptual building activities
to supplement that curriculum.
And I know it's hard
because curriculums are set out, like,
there's already too much
in the textbook to do in a year.
But there are pieces where you have to say, like,
in previous videos, these are the most important pieces
that my kids need to learn this year
and this textbook is
really just focusing on procedural skills.
So I got to bring in
some conceptual stuff around that.
You don't have to bring in conceptual around
everything, but you really want to make sure
that the foundational pieces
of the big things need to be there.
Alright?
Okay.
So conceptual verses procedural.
You are gonna be hard pressed to find anything
that is a nice balance of both.
So just be aware and look for it
and know what needs to be supplemented.
The next piece is,
is the curriculum more of a spiral based
or a mastery based?
Now I will tell you there's research that
you can find to back up both of those things.
So I can not say
that one is better than another.
I personally liked teaching
out of a mastery based curriculum,
more than I liked teaching
out of a spiral based curriculum.
So here's the difference between the two.
Again this is a brief difference.
You can probably have
someone talk for a whole lot longer
about the differences,
but basically a spiral curriculum is
where we introduce the topic
and we don't go really in depth.
So we introduce and then we work on it
a little bit and then we move on to another thing
and then we move on to another thing.
We move on to another thing,
but we'll spiral back around
to that first thing we introduced
to bring it back up.
The theory behind this is that,
when we first introduce something,
not every kid is ready for it.
So if we come back around,
the more repetitions that we get to that thing
and at different points in the year,
they might be more ready for it,
at different times.
The downside of that,
was when I was teaching
out of a spiral curriculum.
Its really felt like,
I was moving on before the kids were ready.
Which is kind of the point,
but I could see them get defeated
because they never felt like they had success.
So some of those kids who just get it,
like the first time.
They always felt successful
and my students who didn't get it
that first time felt defeated
and then we would be on to something new
and they didn't get that
and we would be on to something new
and they didn't get that.
Its just felt like I was always
bringing something to them
and they didn't get it and didn't get it.
And by the time we'd bring it back around
their already so defeated
and it's part way through the year
and their hating math.
So I personally did not
like teaching out of a spiral curriculum.
You may have a different viewpoint on that,
but that was my viewpoint.
A mastery curriculum is where the curriculum
tends to focus on a certain content
for a longer period of time.
Going in depth, letting kids approach that concept
in lots of different ways.
So if I'm teaching two digit addition,
we would spend a lot of time
focusing on two digit addition.
Looking at it in different ways.
Looking at it in context
and really building mastery around that content,
before I moved into two digit subtraction
or before I moved into measurement concepts.
So you're really focusing in depth on a concept.
Which I loved,
the downside of that type of curriculum
is that you don't bring it back around.
So you're focusing on two digit addition,
for lets say a month, maybe two months
depending upon how long
you need to spend on it with your kids.
And then you don't bring it back up again,
until by the end of the year,
they may have forgotten the things that
we talked about in the beginning of the year.
So there's pluses and minuses to both
types of curriculum.
I want you to know which type of curriculum
you have so that you know what's the issue.
IF you're teaching out of a spiral curriculum,
it may not be the kids don't understand,
but it's just moving too fast
and they don't feel like
their going in depth enough.
If you're teaching out of mastery
and you feel like, oh my goodness,
we are almost towards the end of the school year
and the kids seemed to have forgotten
stuff that we did at the beginning.
That's because we haven't brought it back up.
So be mindful of those issues
and work towards doing things
that help solve it.
So if you're in a mastery based curriculum,
you can do things like,
doing review every single day.
Have a little five minute review time,
that you can bring that back up.
Or if you use guided math,
having those things you've done
kind of at the beginning of the year,
could be in your stations and your work times,
so that they can get more review stuff.
So be mindful, look for those things
and then know that
you're gonna have to supplement
in different ways, no matter what curriculum
your district goes with.
Now if you want official documentation
of what is a good curriculum
and a not so good curriculum.
There is a site called, Ed reports.
Ed reports has a very lengthy process.
They go through evaluating curriculum series.
So I want you to take a look at that,
but take a look at the results there,
with a grain of salt because there's
only, I think, one Eureka math,
that is all green across the side there.
The link that it takes you to
gives a little comparison chart
and Eureka, I think,
is the only one that has all green.
There's some that are pretty much all green,
but have a little, couple yellow spots in there.
But Eureka, which is also known as Engage New York.
You could ask ten people
and you will get probably five of them
that love it and five of them that hate it.
So again even though the Ed reports
might say this is a great curriculum.
Again it goes back to your teaching style
and your philosophy of how math
should be taught to students.
So there is no one great,
best curriculum out there.
I want you to keep these two things in mind,
the conceptual verses procedural
and whether it's a spiral
verses a mastery curriculum.
And you go to Ed reports
to see their official documentation,
but I also want to invite you
into our Facebook group.
We have over 20,000 teachers in there
and people post all the time, asking questions
and you can get personal responses from teachers
who are using that particular curriculum
and maybe they've been using it
for a few years and your district just adopted it.
And you want to get some insight into
what they feel are the good points
and bad points of the curriculum.
This is a great place
and it's not just about curriculum.
There's definitely a lot of other things
that people talk about inside of this group
but it is one of the biggest things
I see people asking inside of that group.
So keep those two things in mind
and come all over and join
the Build Math Minds Facebook group.
So we can all build our math minds
and we can help build the math minds
of our students.
Have a great day.
No comments:
Post a Comment