Youtube News: Youtube daily report w Dec 14 2017

Leaders of the so-called free world don't come cheap.

Whether they are taking trips on Air Force One, hosting get-togethers with other world

leaders, or simply collecting a paycheck, the job demands a fair bit of cash.

You might not be surprised that some leaders are more expensive than others.

There have been men of power that pulled the purse strings and others that weren't quite

so frugal.

But can we blame the President if he, or possibly in the future she, has to spend a lot on doing

the job right?

That's what we will investigate today, in this episode of the Infographics Show, How

Much Does a US President Cost the Taxpayers?

Don't forget to subscribe and click the bell button so that you can be part of our

Notification Squad.

First of all, we must think about salary.

(A book called "The Official Role of the United States President - 2015: U.S.C.

Title 3," said that) A President is currently paid as follows: A basic salary of $400,000

a year, $50,000 in expenses, $100,000 for a nontaxable travel account, and a mere stipend

of $19,000 for entertainment.

In total that's $569,000 a year.

But, and there's a big but, the President also receives benefits.

Those include free housing at the White House with all bills included, being driven around

in a presidential limousine, and taking trips on Marine One and Air Force One.

We'll get to the lowdown on those costs later.

We should also add that forever more the President receives $200,000 a year for his pension plus

healthcare.

It's really not a bad job in terms of pay, although as we know it seems to age you at

a ratio of about 4 years for every 1 year.

Another thing that is interesting is that pay raises for this job don't exactly happen

very often.

There have only been five pay raises for U.S. presidents from 1789 to the present day.

The last one was in 2001 when the salary went up from $200,000 to $400,000.

We shouldn't feel bad for Presidents, though, as the wage still puts them in the top one

percent of earners in the USA.

When talking about costs, we must include salaries, but some Presidents refused to accept

their salary.

There have been three in all.

One of them is the current President, Donald Trump, who has been donating his wad to other

causes than himself.

His first quarter salary went to the National Park Service, and his second quarter salary

went to the Department of Education.

The other two American presidents to have displayed such salary largesse were John F.

Kennedy and Herbert Hoover, although Time magazine once reported that George Washington

declared in his inaugural address that he would not accept the paycheck.

Lawmakers were not pleased with that idea and told Washington it was unconstitutional.

We should say here that while Washington was offered $25,000 for the job in his day's

money, that would be around $600,000 today…We might also add that Washington's benefits

were not as extravagant as today's president.

But, who was the most expensive President so far?

Well, we should say that presidents don't stop costing the taxpayer money.

Presidents don't only get a pension, but they keep on receiving benefits.

This we must take into account when adding up how much they cost.

For 2017 Obama broke the record for asking for the biggest budget.

His expenses were $1,153,000, and this was on top of the reported $400,000 he made for

giving one speech to Wall Street folks.

He also has a $65 million twin book deal in the pipeline.

Fox news and other media reported that his price for the Milan speech was $3.2 million,

although some media left the story alone so we cannot confirm its veracity.

We mention this just to highlight that some presidents obviously like to live the high-life,

which could give credence to them being expensive while in office.

As for other former presidents, Bush's expenses for 2017 were $100,000 less than Obama's,

Clinton's $200,000 less and Jimmy Carter's $456,000 less.

But who has demanded the most cash while still on the job?

Well, you might already know that just recently the media reported that that title goes to

none other than Donald J. Trump.

He may not take a wage, but that's nothing compared to some of the costs for his lifestyle

and added extras to his job.

Just flying his family from his Mar-a-Lago golf resort to New York during Easter reportedly

cost taxpayers $110,000.

According to the LA Times just travel and protection made Trump's "presidential

family the most expensive in history."

His first 100 days cost a grand total of $30 million.

According to some reports Obama and family were costing around $12 million a year.

But that doesn't make much sense when we read other reports from established media

who cite the think tank, Judicial Watch.

According to them, Obama's travel costs, including flights, hotels, car rentals and

all the foie gras and champagne one could quaff, cost the taxpayer close to $106 million

dollars ($105,662,975.27) for his entire presidency.

We can only wait to see what Trump will clock-up during his entire term, though.

To compare these two presidents, whom most media seem to think have been the most costly

to the taxpayer, The Washington Post asked the question in April this year: "Are President

Trump's trips to Mar-a-Lago similar to Obama's travels?"

Roughly, wrote the post, Obama was costing on average around $33,000 a day, although

they had his total eight years at $97 million rather than what seems like the correct one

we stated before.

This is total cost divided by time as President.

What is perhaps unfair for Donald is that people estimate his cost on what one travel

day or holiday costs, according to The Post.

Trump's Mar-a-Lago trips reportedly cost around $60,000 a day, but he also sometimes

goes there to work.

The conclusion was that both presidents were perhaps asking for a little too much and both

were extremely expensive men in the big seat.

But what does the itemized bill look like?

In 2016 it was reported by various media that the total cost of the White House, which includes

security, total staffing, entertainment, and travel, was around 1.4 billion dollars a year.

But this also included policy making staff, which adds a lot onto the bill.

Just moving around, whether from car to plane to helicopter is a highly orchestrated thing

and it reportedly costs around $2,614 every minute the president moves.

According to Business Insider it costs $200,000 an hour to operate Air Force one.

This is because of logistics, but also because it's a highly advanced machine with defense

capabilities.

The Beast Limos the presidents use each cost $1.5 million to buy, never mind what they

cost to drive.

As for bills at the White House?

Well, food is not free, and you have to buy your own face wash and black ties.

Utilities there are paid for, as is gardening and cleaning, etc.

The bill for utilities and house staff is unknown, but it's estimated that staff and

day to day taking care of the White House, plus bills, is around 13.5 million dollars

a year ($13,507,000).

One thing we should say is that Jimmy Carter often gets the plaudits for being the most

well-behaved and least extravagant of U.S. presidents.

Time magazine actually reported that in 1977, two weeks after he was sworn in, he gave a

televised fireside chat from his West Wing study to the American public.

People were surprised he was wearing a rather informal woolly cardigan.

Apparently he'd turned down the heating in the White House to save money and conserve

energy.

So, do you think these presidential costs are ultimately worth it, or should the government

actively seek a way to reduce the presidential price tag?

Let us know in the comments!

Also, be sure to check out our other video called American Soldier vs British Soldier!

Thanks for watching, and, as always, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> How Much Does a US President Cost the Taxpayers? - Duration: 6:35.

-------------------------------------------

Настоящее и будущее Искусственного Интеллекта [Новости науки и технологий] - Duration: 11:13.

For more infomation >> Настоящее и будущее Искусственного Интеллекта [Новости науки и технологий] - Duration: 11:13.

-------------------------------------------

Beauty Fails of 2017 | cruelty free @phyrra - Duration: 15:09.

Hey friends.

Welcome back.

For those of you who don't know me, I'm Courtney, and I have my two standard poodles, Phaedra

and Nyx, in the room with me so you may see them in the background.

Today I'm going to be sharing my makeup fails of 2017 and these are all the products that

I feel really sucked and I'm going to tell you why they sucked.

But before we jump into this video I want to ask you to hit the little subscribe button

down below so you won't miss any of my videos, like my Best Beauty Products of 2017, that's

coming up soon.

Okay, so the first product that I want to talk about that absolutely sucked and was

a big fail for me was the One Two Lashes.

Now, these are magnetic lashes and I tried wearing them and they are just really difficult

to make them look right.

I bought these because of YouTuber Stephanie Lange.

I absolutely love her.

She does the best hooded eye makeup videos of anybody on YouTube and she put these on,

she made it look so simple, but I swear the pair that I got don't match up.

It looks like I'm putting moose antlers on my lashes.

They just look so weird and I really wanted them to work because they're easy to put on.

You just can't adjust them to make them look proper.

No matter what I did, they would still just stick up funny so one would be up this way

and the other one would be this way so they just didn't ever want to look right on my

eyes.

So, I gave up on them.

I'm going to try and return them to see if I can get my money back but I don't know if

I'm within that window to do so.

So, the next product that really sucked for me was from one of the DCM companies called

Niod.

It's their Photography Fluent Primer.

Let me read you what the website says it's going to do.

It says it's a novel approach to creating the foundation for skin that reflects even

radiance and life and very specifically, for the camera lens.

This serum textured product contains a wide array of refracting prisms, toning hue correctors

and topical finishing technologies to offer even radiance within seconds.

So, this thing sounds amazing.

It's in a little dropper.

I tried the Pure Found Photography Filter and actually really like it but the one from

Niod sucked for my skin.

Basically, what it did one me was give me a white gold glow all over, which, okay, that's

really cool, but it basically clung to every single dry patch around my face and if you

don't know, I have dry skin.

So, basically, it emphasized all kinds of dryness and looked terrible.

It looked even worse when I tried to put makeup on top of it.

I wouldn't recommend this product to anyone.

It sucked and I was unfortunately unable to return it.

I have major regrets over wasting my money on this primer.

Next up is the Glossier SPF35.

So, I like most of my Glossier products.

There are a couple misses that I have had but most of them have been hits.

I really loved the Perfecting Skin Tint, I loved the Boy Brow.

Those two products are really great for me.

The Milky Jelly Cleanser, I really like as well.

The SPF product, no good.

For me, if I got the SPF anywhere near my eyes, my eyes would start burning.

My eyes are sensitive.

Okay, I get that but even worse, it caused me to break out.

I really was hoping that this product would be something I could love cause it's one of

those colorless sunscreens so it doesn't leave a white cast, which I personally don't mind

a white cast but I know a lot of you really hate white casts so I wanted to be able to

recommend it but nope, can't.

It sucks.

The next product that was a big fail for me is probably one that's going to cause a fight

because I feel like everybody else says it's a holy grail but it was the Tarte Shape Tape.

Now, the Tarte Shape Tape that I got smelled like bug spray.

I'm telling you, it smelled like Off or citronella candles or something just terrible.

I didn't really like how thick it was and chunky and the color that I got, I think I

got Fair Neutral cause I ordered it from Ulta's website because they had the color but then

when I went in store to see if I could exchange it for another one, they didn't have the shade

in store.

So, the formula didn't work for me, the color didn't really work for me but the smell was

the worst part.

I don't understand how anybody could put that on their face when it smells like bug spray

and be okay with it.

Somebody else said that theirs smells like citrus but mine smelled like straight up bug

spray.

It was disgusting.

My husband smelled it and he was like, "Don't put that on your face."

This is after I dabbed it on, tried to use the beauty blender to blend it out, nope.

That is not for me.

It was terrible.

Give me my Kat Von D Lock-It Concealer Crème because that shit is awesome.

Tarte Shape Tape, nuh-uh.

Throw it in the trash.

The next product that I tried that I thought would be good was the Makeup Revolution Blush

in Nude and it's one of their matte blushes.

It just really wasn't anything that wowed me.

The formula and texture wasn't that great.

Yeah, it's a drugstore blush so it's really cheap but I didn't like how it settled on

my skin and usually I like matte blushes and prefer them because I think that they look

really flattering, especially since I like to wear more blingy highlighters but I just

didn't like how it looked on me at all.

So, the next product that was a total bust for me was the Smashbox Photo Lid Primer in

Smokey this is supposed to make it easier to do really dark, dramatic and smokey looks

and I thought this would be a time saver and really, not for me.

It didn't work very well.

In my crease, it would crease and wear away so that kinda defeats the point of an eye

shadow primer if it's not going to stick around.

I wanted to love it but couldn't.

The next product on my list that I can't stand is the J Cat Beauty Pearl Illuminizer.

Now, this came in a jar and it looked very similar to a lot of the Ben Nye powders.

I have the Ben Nye Cameo Powder somewhere in my makeup stash.

I don't know where it's at this minute but the Pearl Illuminizer, I thought, it was supposed

to give you a nice ethereal glow.

When I put it on, it was like I put on a white frosty eyeshadow all over my face.

It emphasized every single line, every single pore, was not pretty, was not flattering at

all.

It was terrible.

So awful.

Do no recommend.

Okay.

So, the next product is something I really wanted to love and I bought into the hype

so I bought it and that was the Kat Von D Lolita Blush.

I love Kat Von D. I love almost all of my Kat Von D products but not this.

This is supposed to be a Rosy Neutral, Rosewood Brown or something like that, Reddish Chestnut,

anything.

I think Rosy Brown is how she described it.

Well, when I put it on my skin, it goes ... Actually, I can't put it on this hand cause I have a

bunch of weird swatches on here.

When I put it on my skin, which my skin tone is basically like a cool yellow, it pulls

very orangy brown, not rosy brown, orange.

I don't think it looks flattering on me at all so I can't really

wear it as eyeshadow.

I can kind of wear it as a blush if I want to wear an orangy blush, which I don't necessarily

think that looks good on me.

So, I was really just disappointed that this awesome product that's supposed to be a cult

favorite that everybody loves, looks like crap on me.

I guess that's because of my cool yellow skin tone.

Next up, I bought the Smashbox Studio Skin Face Shaping Foundation Stick in the shade

0.5 Porcelain, I had to look it up, and it was like $42.

I thought this would be cool because it's basically a foundation on one side and a contour

on the other.

The contour shade actually worked pretty well for my skin tone so I was really pleased about

that but the foundation was another story.

It was not good.

It basically turned sorta peachy orange on my skin.

It also was one of those foundations that really clung in my dry patches.

So, while it was a Vegan Foundation, it just didn't work for me.

And on the subject of foundations not working for me, next up we have the NYX Total Control

Drops in Pale.

Now the pale yellow color was a really great match for my skin tone.

I give NYX props for making a really inclusive shade range.

They had a ton of shades and I actually had a match.

I was really happy about that.

That's about the extent of all I was happy about because the formula itself looked like

shit on my skin.

It was another one of those things that just clung to all of my dry patches.

I felt like basically, I was dribbling half the bottle on my face to try to get it to

cover all over because if you just put three drops, I couldn't get it to cover anything.

It was ridiculous.

I saw so many people loved this or hated this, it was very polarizing, but I am definitely

in that hate camp because it was terrible on me.

Next up, and I feel bad saying this, but it's the Fenty Pro Filt'r Foundation.

So, the formula, I know it's more geared towards oily skin.

To counter that, what I did was bought some vitamin E oil to put into it, which made it

much more comfortable for me to wear on my dry skin.

The shade that I bought was shade 100.

This shade is supposed to be a perfect match for my skin tone.

When I put it on and it was wet, it matched perfectly.

It looked great.

Once it dried down, it turned this coppery, orangey color.

So, my face would be coppery orange and the rest of me would be this light kind of yellow

toned skin so it looked very weird.

Between the lack of a good shade match and the formula being more geared towards oily

skin, I went ahead and returned it to Sephora.

I felt bad but it just did not work for me at all.

I also tried a couple of the Fenty Match Sticks.

I tried Ivory, which was supposed to be either a foundation or a concealer but either way,

it looks terrible on me.

It basically emphasized all kinds of skin texture and dryness.

It was really dry and cakey.

I don't think it looked good at all and I'm also not a fan of Amber, the contour color,

which I know everybody has been raving about this color but I just didn't feel like it

did a lot for me so I returned both of those because I wanted to love them but didn't like

how they looked on me at all.

Under more foundations I found that I hate this year, the Wet N Wild Photo Focus Foundation

in Porcelain.

I thought this was going to be my perfect drugstore match.

The color's not bad.

I still have to add white to it to make it a perfect match for my skin tone so it's not

just a foundation I can just put on and go or else I have basically a dark head, light

neck, which I don't think is attractive, but the real problem I had with the foundation

was the formula.

It really was cakey and would basically cling to my dry patches and then turn cakey so it

did not work for my dry skin.

Next up, we have another foundation.

It's the Too Faced Peach Perfect Foundation.

I bought the shade Snow.

I thought initially I really liked how it looked on my skin.

I liked the finish.

The color on it's own was too dark.

I needed to add white to it to make a good match.

The fragrance was overpowering, the peachy scent.

Ultimately, that's probably the downfall.

The fragrance that was in that foundation caused me to break out really bad along my

chin and my jaw.

It was very painful.

So, while I wanted to love it because I liked the ingredients aside from the fragrance and

I liked the formula, because it made me break out and the fact that I had to add white to

it to make a better match, I just had to return it.

I don't understand why companies continue to add fragrance to foundation when it causes

a lot of people to break out, not just me.

It's very rare that I can wear any sort of foundation, or even a skincare product, with

fragrance because most of the time, they make me break out.

The rare exception I can think of right now is the Huda Beauty Faux Filter Foundation

in Milkshake.

I'm really shocked that does not cause me to break out because the fragrance.

So, Too Faced, if you're listening, I would love it if you made your Peach Perfect Foundation

without any fragrance in it and in a lighter shade because Snow is not Snow.

Snow is about the color of peachy orange.

I don't know.

It's just not Snow.

Or if your Snow is that color, I don't want to play in it.

Next up is the Wander Beauty Flash Focus Hydrating Foundation Stick in the shade, Fair.

I assumed that because the shade was Fair and it had a very limited shade range, that,

hey, this is going to be a match for my skin tone.

I was wrong.

I really like the formula on this though because it's super hydrating.

It is great for my dry skin but the color's too dark and unfortunately, I realized that

it was too dark and not going to work for me after I was already outside of the Sephora

return window and that kinda sucked because it's expensive.

I think it was like $42 or $45 so I had to basically eat that.

I think that's all the foundations for you.

I tried a ton more foundations this year but these are my big fails.

Next up would be the Anastasia Beverly Hills Subculture Palette.

Now, I bought this palette when I was doing a review for Silk Naturals on the collection

that they made that's basically a vegan in dupe of those colors and I gave it a try.

It's not as bad as everybody says it was but I still don't think it's a great palette and

I'll tell you why it's on this list.

In my opinion, because the formula is so powdery, it's very wasteful.

I'm used to working with pigments like loose pigments and stuff so I know how to carefully

tap in to get product off but even when I would carefully tap in, a ton of excess powder

would kick up so it just felt like very wasteful every time I would touch the palette.

I don't understand what Anastasia was thinking with that formula because their eyeshadow

singles are actually, in my opinion, very good but that palette sucks.

The next product on my list is the Wet n Wild Micellar Water.

Now, this is a makeup remover and initially I thought that it was a great product because

it did a pretty good job at removing my eye makeup, my face makeup, but I don't know what

happened to it when I was about halfway through the bottle, it changed.

It smelled like, I would almost describe it as a burnt rubber type smell, but it smelled

bad and I was like, "Oh, no.

This isn't good."

So, I experimented with trying to take my makeup off with it once the smell changed

and it basically kind of burned so I just tossed it out right away.

Don't know why it changed, don't know what went on with that but I was very disappointed

in that because that's the first time I've ever had any micellar water go bad on me and

I use a lot of them.

I mostly use Pacifica's Coconut Water or Yes To's Coconut Water but I was trying the Wet

n Wild because it's like, "Oh, hey, it's a new product from Wet n Wild.

I should give it a shot."

It sucked.

So, last but not least, is the It Cosmetics Bye Bye Redness Neutralizing Correcting Cream.

This stuff comes in a little pot and in the pot, it looks promising.

When I put it on my skin, it's like a peach color but then it dries down to like an orange.

I'm pretty sure I've shared this on my Instagram stories whenever I first got it and I was

so disappointed because I got my hopes up really high because I thought it was going

to be one of those products that I could just dab on my worst areas of my redness, then

put my foundation on and be done, but no.

When I put it on my face, it's like I put blotches of orange all over my face.

It does not look good.

Then I still have to cake on foundation and cover it up.

So, what's the point?

I really wish that It Cosmetics would fix their shade range that they have, truly fair

shades and truly deep shades as opposed to these shades that claim to be "Fair" like

Transforming Porcelain Beige because to me, that sounds like, hey, that would be a color

that would match me.

But in the cream, it does not.

I did have a friend of mine, my friend Britney, gave me the Transforming Porcelain Beige in

the powder and the powder actually is light enough for my skin.

So, if I was going to use all powder foundation, this would work because I could just put it

on the areas where the redness is worst and then put on a light foundation anywhere else

to even me out and be done.

Here's hoping that someday It Cosmetics fixes their shade range.

So, anyway, I hope you enjoyed hearing me rant about my worst products of 2017.

Make sure you let me know what products sucked for you in 2017 in the comments below.

If you liked this video and found it entertaining, fun, informative or helpful, please give it

a thumbs up and share.

It really helps me out when you share my videos and I really appreciate it.

Thanks so much for hanging out with me and I'll see you in my next video.

For more infomation >> Beauty Fails of 2017 | cruelty free @phyrra - Duration: 15:09.

-------------------------------------------

Recom RPA60-FW Series | Digi-Key Daily - Duration: 1:10.

RECOM RPA60-FW series are high power density, high efficiency DC/DC converters for space

constrained railway and industrial applications.

RPA60-FW converters have a wide 4:1 input voltage range, provide 1500 / 1 minute isolation

between input and output, and are UL60950-1 and EN50155 certified.

Converters are available with a single output at 5, 12, 15, or 24 volts with ±10% output

voltage trimming, tight regulation, and low output ripple and noise.

The RPA60-FW series has no minimum load requirement, can drive capacitive loads up to 20,000 µF,

and has multiple protections to ensure reliable operation.

For more infomation >> Recom RPA60-FW Series | Digi-Key Daily - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

13 GOP governors won't sign letter supporting the Republican tax scam - Duration: 2:02.

13 GOP governors won�t sign letter supporting the Republican tax scam.

Donald Trump might be able to count on blind loyalty in Congress when it comes to his agenda

� including the horribly unpopular GOP tax scheme currently being rammed through Congress

� but outside of the Beltway, key Republicans are keeping their distance.

That includes 13 Republican governors who refused to a sign a letter, spearheaded by

Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI), touting the GOP tax scheme.

On Twitter, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) boasted that more than 20 Republican

governors signed on to the push.

But that means an awful lot of governors refused � an embarrassing development for the GOP,

considering that the tax scheme is being touted as the keystone to Trump�s thin legislative

agenda this year.

Among the GOP governors who did not sign the tax letter were Chris Christie of New Jersey,

John Kasich of Ohio, Rick Scott of Florida, Rick Snyder of Michigan, and Brian Sandoval

of Nevada.

Meanwhile, Phil Scott of Vermont recently announced his opposition to the bill, saying

that residents of his state will be �on the losing end� of the GOP�s tax scam.

In fact, most Americans will be on the losing end.

Despite what Republicans may claim, the tax bill is nothing more than a giveaway for the

rich, funded by working class Americans.

According to the Tax Policy Center, 87 million families making less than $200,000 annually

would experience a tax hike by 2027 under the plan that Republicans just rammed through

the Senate in the middle of the night.

Furthermore, according to an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget,

�nearly 70 percent of the tax cuts would go to businesses over 10 years,� the Associated

Press reported.

�The rest of the tax cuts appear to favor the wealthy.�

Perhaps another reason so many Republican governors wouldn�t sign Walker�s letter

is that the GOP scheme could decimate America�s safety net, which would impact state lawmakers

and governors much more directly than members of Congress.

The pending bill is already projected to cut Medicare by approximately $400 billion over

the next decade � and Republican members of Congress are already signaling that their

next move will be to propose even deeper cuts to Medicare and Social Security.

If the Republican tax bill actually embodied what the GOP claimed it did � a tax break

for the working class � every GOP governor in America would rally behind it.

For more infomation >> 13 GOP governors won't sign letter supporting the Republican tax scam - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

Awesome Party Playlist

For more infomation >> Awesome Party Playlist

-------------------------------------------

Al Bano e Romina Power: Ti amo, la dedica romantica per Natale | K.N.B.T - Duration: 2:41.

For more infomation >> Al Bano e Romina Power: Ti amo, la dedica romantica per Natale | K.N.B.T - Duration: 2:41.

-------------------------------------------

Escándalo: Trapero ordenó espiar a cargos del PP e intentó destruir las pruebas - Duration: 3:21.

For more infomation >> Escándalo: Trapero ordenó espiar a cargos del PP e intentó destruir las pruebas - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

The Young | Broad Appeal: Living With E's - Duration: 2:46.

Mannequin! (Eulalia startles)

Jesus Enid, what are ya...

It's something the young people have made up.

They scream out mannequin and you have to freeze

wherever you are.

Oh my God, the young crowd, they think they made up everything.

- Yeah. - Sure, that's just like the

game we used to play, statues or Mother, may I?

Yes, only we didn't video tape it, see.

And they think they invented sex.

Yeah, we didn't video tape that either.

Oh and how stunned are they, just standing there,

as large as life, proof positive that they never invented sex.

Oh God, sex. What a hard old way to spend five minutes.

And then the way they communicate with each other,

with their little pictures.

- Emojis. (both) Yeah.

Just like, on the walls of Egyptian tombs.

Yeah, hieroglyphics.

- Yes. - Same as that.

- Oh my God. - Everything old is new again.

Yes, including cranky old coots like us.

- Yeah. - Oh they say now,

that being old is achingly cool.

Yes, sure, you know, with things moving so fast,

it's inevitable that old bat style would come back in again.

My personal style has trended four times

in my own lifetime.

Oh yes, things are back in before they have

a chance to go out.

Because people are so busy, girl.

But what in the name of God are they so busy doing?

Well, I know they haven't got time for the inconvenience

of a headache.

No, and they're not going to let stomach upset slow down

their active lifestyle.

No, and they never did have time for long grain brown rice.

- Oh, they're too busy to live. - Yeah.

And yet, in too much of a hurry to lie down and die out of it.

Yeah, oh it should.

Coats like ours, they're flying off the racks down to

"Valoo Village."

Oh yes, the young people have gone right cracked for

the vintage, frumpy look.

- Yes, and the gator's.. - Yeah?

Not so much now, the rain hats, you know?

No, I think the world would never really spin fast enough

to bring those rain hats back into vogue.

But what are you saying, you don't like my rain hat?

Oh no, I love it!

I just don't see it turning up in "Valoo Village"

anytime soon, you know.

Oh.

What are you doing?

Dapping, or dabbing or something.

The young ones claim they came up with that too, but,

sure it's in that famous picture of Adam and Eve,

you know, being cast out of the Garden of Eden, you know?

Oh yes, I know, because I was there.

- I took the picture. - What?

Yes, and you know, it was Adam and Enid, not Adam and Eve.

(laughter) Enid...

You shouldn't go to church,

you're going to burst into flames.

Here's hoping.

For more infomation >> The Young | Broad Appeal: Living With E's - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

GF Vip, Luca e Ivana fidanzati? Arriva il messaggio d'amore | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:30.

For more infomation >> GF Vip, Luca e Ivana fidanzati? Arriva il messaggio d'amore | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

ZEN - Relaxing Zen Music And Sounds Of Nature And Water For Meditation - Duration: 2:01:57.

ZEN - Relaxing Zen Music And Sounds Of Nature And Water For Meditation

For more infomation >> ZEN - Relaxing Zen Music And Sounds Of Nature And Water For Meditation - Duration: 2:01:57.

-------------------------------------------

Belen e Andrea Iannone | Crisi passata | Bacio a Roma - Duration: 1:44.

For more infomation >> Belen e Andrea Iannone | Crisi passata | Bacio a Roma - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

Repelente natural para mosquitos da dengue, zica, pernilongos e moscas da cozinha - Duration: 6:08.

For more infomation >> Repelente natural para mosquitos da dengue, zica, pernilongos e moscas da cozinha - Duration: 6:08.

-------------------------------------------

2 Idee per Natale. ❊ Tutorial: fermagli e orecchini in fimo ❊ - Duration: 13:00.

For more infomation >> 2 Idee per Natale. ❊ Tutorial: fermagli e orecchini in fimo ❊ - Duration: 13:00.

-------------------------------------------

X Factor 2017, Samuel Storm, The story: testo e traduzione dell'inedito - Duration: 5:54.

For more infomation >> X Factor 2017, Samuel Storm, The story: testo e traduzione dell'inedito - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

Zen - Sweet Music And Water Sound Scrolling For Meditation And Relaxation - Duration: 2:01:57.

Zen - Sweet Music And Water Sound Scrolling For Meditation And Relaxation

For more infomation >> Zen - Sweet Music And Water Sound Scrolling For Meditation And Relaxation - Duration: 2:01:57.

-------------------------------------------

Enzo Dong, Singolo D'Oro: testo e video - Duration: 3:05.

For more infomation >> Enzo Dong, Singolo D'Oro: testo e video - Duration: 3:05.

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse 300 BLUETEC HYBRID Distronic / Memory / Pano / Leder / LED - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse 300 BLUETEC HYBRID Distronic / Memory / Pano / Leder / LED - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Peugeot 108 1.0 e-VTi 68pk 3D Allure - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Peugeot 108 1.0 e-VTi 68pk 3D Allure - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Peugeot 108 1.0 e-VTi 5-DRS Blue Lease (Airco/Bluetooth) - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Peugeot 108 1.0 e-VTi 5-DRS Blue Lease (Airco/Bluetooth) - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Niesmann+Bischoff Arto 76 E - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> Niesmann+Bischoff Arto 76 E - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Gossip U&D, clamoroso ritorno in trasmissione: ecco quando e di chi si tratta | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:35.

For more infomation >> Gossip U&D, clamoroso ritorno in trasmissione: ecco quando e di chi si tratta | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:35.

-------------------------------------------

GF VIP: Mattino 5: Aida Yespica e la la rottura con il fidanzato napoletano Geppy | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:30.

For more infomation >> GF VIP: Mattino 5: Aida Yespica e la la rottura con il fidanzato napoletano Geppy | Wind Zuiden - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

Citroën DS3 E-HDI AUTOMAAT - NAV - JBL SOUNDSYSTEM - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Citroën DS3 E-HDI AUTOMAAT - NAV - JBL SOUNDSYSTEM - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Cena de perseguição e prisão de Malagueta requer da Globo o uso de dublês - Duration: 3:59.

For more infomation >> Cena de perseguição e prisão de Malagueta requer da Globo o uso de dublês - Duration: 3:59.

-------------------------------------------

Rocio Munoz parla del divorzio difficile tra Raoul e l'ex moglie - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> Rocio Munoz parla del divorzio difficile tra Raoul e l'ex moglie - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Rajasthan Tourism

For more infomation >> Rajasthan Tourism

-------------------------------------------

Volkswagen Golf 1.4 TSI Business Edition R Connected - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Volkswagen Golf 1.4 TSI Business Edition R Connected - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Renault Mégane TCE 130pk Bose (R-link/Climate/PDC/17''LMV) - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Renault Mégane TCE 130pk Bose (R-link/Climate/PDC/17''LMV) - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Renault Mégane Estate 1.5 dCi Bose (R-link/Camera/Climate/PDC/17''LMV) - Duration: 1:03.

For more infomation >> Renault Mégane Estate 1.5 dCi Bose (R-link/Camera/Climate/PDC/17''LMV) - Duration: 1:03.

-------------------------------------------

МУЛЬТИКОШЕЛЕК #CRYPTONATOR РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ ОБЗОР - Duration: 9:17.

For more infomation >> МУЛЬТИКОШЕЛЕК #CRYPTONATOR РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ ОБЗОР - Duration: 9:17.

-------------------------------------------

How Much Does a US President Cost the Taxpayers? - Duration: 6:35.

Leaders of the so-called free world don't come cheap.

Whether they are taking trips on Air Force One, hosting get-togethers with other world

leaders, or simply collecting a paycheck, the job demands a fair bit of cash.

You might not be surprised that some leaders are more expensive than others.

There have been men of power that pulled the purse strings and others that weren't quite

so frugal.

But can we blame the President if he, or possibly in the future she, has to spend a lot on doing

the job right?

That's what we will investigate today, in this episode of the Infographics Show, How

Much Does a US President Cost the Taxpayers?

Don't forget to subscribe and click the bell button so that you can be part of our

Notification Squad.

First of all, we must think about salary.

(A book called "The Official Role of the United States President - 2015: U.S.C.

Title 3," said that) A President is currently paid as follows: A basic salary of $400,000

a year, $50,000 in expenses, $100,000 for a nontaxable travel account, and a mere stipend

of $19,000 for entertainment.

In total that's $569,000 a year.

But, and there's a big but, the President also receives benefits.

Those include free housing at the White House with all bills included, being driven around

in a presidential limousine, and taking trips on Marine One and Air Force One.

We'll get to the lowdown on those costs later.

We should also add that forever more the President receives $200,000 a year for his pension plus

healthcare.

It's really not a bad job in terms of pay, although as we know it seems to age you at

a ratio of about 4 years for every 1 year.

Another thing that is interesting is that pay raises for this job don't exactly happen

very often.

There have only been five pay raises for U.S. presidents from 1789 to the present day.

The last one was in 2001 when the salary went up from $200,000 to $400,000.

We shouldn't feel bad for Presidents, though, as the wage still puts them in the top one

percent of earners in the USA.

When talking about costs, we must include salaries, but some Presidents refused to accept

their salary.

There have been three in all.

One of them is the current President, Donald Trump, who has been donating his wad to other

causes than himself.

His first quarter salary went to the National Park Service, and his second quarter salary

went to the Department of Education.

The other two American presidents to have displayed such salary largesse were John F.

Kennedy and Herbert Hoover, although Time magazine once reported that George Washington

declared in his inaugural address that he would not accept the paycheck.

Lawmakers were not pleased with that idea and told Washington it was unconstitutional.

We should say here that while Washington was offered $25,000 for the job in his day's

money, that would be around $600,000 today…We might also add that Washington's benefits

were not as extravagant as today's president.

But, who was the most expensive President so far?

Well, we should say that presidents don't stop costing the taxpayer money.

Presidents don't only get a pension, but they keep on receiving benefits.

This we must take into account when adding up how much they cost.

For 2017 Obama broke the record for asking for the biggest budget.

His expenses were $1,153,000, and this was on top of the reported $400,000 he made for

giving one speech to Wall Street folks.

He also has a $65 million twin book deal in the pipeline.

Fox news and other media reported that his price for the Milan speech was $3.2 million,

although some media left the story alone so we cannot confirm its veracity.

We mention this just to highlight that some presidents obviously like to live the high-life,

which could give credence to them being expensive while in office.

As for other former presidents, Bush's expenses for 2017 were $100,000 less than Obama's,

Clinton's $200,000 less and Jimmy Carter's $456,000 less.

But who has demanded the most cash while still on the job?

Well, you might already know that just recently the media reported that that title goes to

none other than Donald J. Trump.

He may not take a wage, but that's nothing compared to some of the costs for his lifestyle

and added extras to his job.

Just flying his family from his Mar-a-Lago golf resort to New York during Easter reportedly

cost taxpayers $110,000.

According to the LA Times just travel and protection made Trump's "presidential

family the most expensive in history."

His first 100 days cost a grand total of $30 million.

According to some reports Obama and family were costing around $12 million a year.

But that doesn't make much sense when we read other reports from established media

who cite the think tank, Judicial Watch.

According to them, Obama's travel costs, including flights, hotels, car rentals and

all the foie gras and champagne one could quaff, cost the taxpayer close to $106 million

dollars ($105,662,975.27) for his entire presidency.

We can only wait to see what Trump will clock-up during his entire term, though.

To compare these two presidents, whom most media seem to think have been the most costly

to the taxpayer, The Washington Post asked the question in April this year: "Are President

Trump's trips to Mar-a-Lago similar to Obama's travels?"

Roughly, wrote the post, Obama was costing on average around $33,000 a day, although

they had his total eight years at $97 million rather than what seems like the correct one

we stated before.

This is total cost divided by time as President.

What is perhaps unfair for Donald is that people estimate his cost on what one travel

day or holiday costs, according to The Post.

Trump's Mar-a-Lago trips reportedly cost around $60,000 a day, but he also sometimes

goes there to work.

The conclusion was that both presidents were perhaps asking for a little too much and both

were extremely expensive men in the big seat.

But what does the itemized bill look like?

In 2016 it was reported by various media that the total cost of the White House, which includes

security, total staffing, entertainment, and travel, was around 1.4 billion dollars a year.

But this also included policy making staff, which adds a lot onto the bill.

Just moving around, whether from car to plane to helicopter is a highly orchestrated thing

and it reportedly costs around $2,614 every minute the president moves.

According to Business Insider it costs $200,000 an hour to operate Air Force one.

This is because of logistics, but also because it's a highly advanced machine with defense

capabilities.

The Beast Limos the presidents use each cost $1.5 million to buy, never mind what they

cost to drive.

As for bills at the White House?

Well, food is not free, and you have to buy your own face wash and black ties.

Utilities there are paid for, as is gardening and cleaning, etc.

The bill for utilities and house staff is unknown, but it's estimated that staff and

day to day taking care of the White House, plus bills, is around 13.5 million dollars

a year ($13,507,000).

One thing we should say is that Jimmy Carter often gets the plaudits for being the most

well-behaved and least extravagant of U.S. presidents.

Time magazine actually reported that in 1977, two weeks after he was sworn in, he gave a

televised fireside chat from his West Wing study to the American public.

People were surprised he was wearing a rather informal woolly cardigan.

Apparently he'd turned down the heating in the White House to save money and conserve

energy.

So, do you think these presidential costs are ultimately worth it, or should the government

actively seek a way to reduce the presidential price tag?

Let us know in the comments!

Also, be sure to check out our other video called American Soldier vs British Soldier!

Thanks for watching, and, as always, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> How Much Does a US President Cost the Taxpayers? - Duration: 6:35.

-------------------------------------------

Crytek sues RSI over Star Citizen & Squadron 42 - Duration: 54:28.

For more infomation >> Crytek sues RSI over Star Citizen & Squadron 42 - Duration: 54:28.