Trump�s Military Buildup Won�t Begin Until 2019
BY MARCUS WEISGERBER
Pentagon officials say they're working to fix readiness first, then grow the military.
Don�t expect to see President Donald Trump�s promised military buildup kick into gear until
2019, senior Pentagon officials said Tuesday, hours after delivering their 2018 request
to Capitol Hill.
The $639 billion defense spending request � that�s a $574 billion �base budget�
plus $65 billion to fight in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria and send more troops to Europe � tops
the current year�s base-plus-overseas contingency operations total by about $52 billion.
It�s �the next step in rebuilding the armed forces,� acting Pentagon Comptroller
John Roth told reporters at the Pentagon. �That is a significant increased commitment
on the part of this administration to defense spending.�
But it still falls short, according to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, who leads the Senate
Armed Services Committee. Trump�s budget plan is �inadequate to the challenges we
face, illegal under current law, and part of an overall budget proposal that is dead
on arrival in Congress,� McCain said.
Trump�s proposal is $52 billion above federal spending caps mandated by the Budget Control
Act of 2011. Legislative compromise on those caps seems unlikely in the context of the
overall budget proposal, which aims to cut billions of dollars from domestic and safety-net
spending and sets up a fight with congressional Democrats.
During the 2016 campaign, Trump pledged to buy more warships and combat aircraft. Just
days after taking office, the new president signed an executive order at the Pentagon
to underscore his desire to fulfill those campaign promises.
Now four months into his presidency, Pentagon officials say those increases will take time.
�You will not see a growth in force structure� in Trump�s 2018 budget projections, Roth
said. �You will not see a growth in the shipbuilding plan. You will not see a robust
modernization program.�
Instead, Roth and other Pentagon officials have pointed to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis�
three-step approach to rebuild the military. It aims first to fill equipment and training
holes, then to increase the capacity of the military, and finally, to make it more lethal.
Last week, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford told Defense One that he expects the
Pentagon to start buying new weapons in the coming years to meet those goals.
The documents that accompany the Pentagon�s 2018 spending request most lack long-term
projections. Roth said that�s because decisions about future budgets will be shaped by military
strategy reviews now underway.
�The secretary has not spent any time at all looking at anything beyond FY18 to date,
in large part because what we have stood up � is we begun the process of developing
the new defense strategy,� Roth said Tuesday. �The intent and the goal was that that new
defense strategy would inform anything beyond FY19.�
But the acting comptroller said to expect an uptick in Pentagon spending down the road.
Roth said that the relatively flat, long-term defense spending projection released by the
White House �is not the top line that we will be seeking here particularly as we go
to the FY19 budget.�
�That flat line is not informed by strategy and it�s not informed by policy,� he said.
Will Congress would approve Trump�s Pentagon spending proposal?
�I�m actually fairly sanguine,� Roth said. �Actually, a lot of the reaction we�ve
gotten so far from our meetings with some of the members is �Why didn�t you ask
for more?��
For more infomation >> Trump's Military Buildup Won't Begin Until 2019 - Duration: 4:19.-------------------------------------------
Hablemos de misterio, ovnis, paranormal, arqueología, magia e historia. - Duration: 2:19:26.
-------------------------------------------
Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse E 350 d Limousine Automaat AMG Line - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Peugeot 508 SW 2.0 E-HDI 150 PK BLUE LEASE EXECUTIVE NAVI PDC HEAD UP 16" LM - Duration: 1:00.
-------------------------------------------
Toyota Aygo 1.0-12V Dynamic Navigator Navi Airco E.Ramen Luxe 82000 km! '11 - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Peugeot 208 1.4 E-HDI ACTIVE Navi 62dkm - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse C 350 e Limousine Lease Edition 7% Bijtelling - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse 350 E LEASE EDITION Avantgarde 15% Bijtelling - Duration: 0:53.
-------------------------------------------
Homilia Diária.545: Sábado da 6.ª Semana da Páscoa - Por que há santos maiores e menores? - Duration: 5:23.
-------------------------------------------
Peugeot 108 1.0 e-VTi 68pk 5D Allure NEFKENS ACTIEPRIJS - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Peugeot 108 1.0 12V E-VTI 68PK 5DR Blue Lion Direct leverbaar!! - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Seat Ibiza ST 1.2tdi e-ecomotive businessline high start/stop - Duration: 0:57.
-------------------------------------------
1450 Telemensagem Dia dos Namorados para Esposa - Voz Masc. - Duration: 0:45.
-------------------------------------------
Reaction Video - Eurovision 2017 Semifinal 2 (ENGLISH SUBTITLES) - Duration: 5:43.
(Voice of a classmate talking)
ME: Ok
*Breath*
[--- BULGARIA! ---]
ME: Ok, go, go go...
ME: Macedonia, Macedonia...
Macedonia!
[--- BELARUS! ---]
ME: My favorite!
ME: My favorite
ME: Is... Macedonia, Macedonia
[--- CROATIA! ---]
But he was so weak!
ME: Ok
ME: There are 7 left
ME: I'm shaking
[--- HUNGARY! ---]
ME: Meh...
Oh, cheer up, cheer up!
ME: San Marino
[--- DENMARK! ---]
Oh...
[--- Our sixth finalist is... ---]
[--- ISRAEL! ---]
How many places left?
ME: (Four)
ME: Macedonia, please
ME: It would be the fifth year that they don't qualify
Quiet, it will pass
[--- ROMANIA! ---]
ME: Ok, ok
ME: Ok
ME: Three left
But, if she (Jana) had a marriage proposal, they must let she pass!
ME: I'm so nervous
ME: Go, go, go, go
ME: Macedonia, Macedonia
ME: At least "my favorites" are already qualified
ME: Macedonia and Estonia. I need Macedonia and Estonia
[--- NORWAY! ---]
IC: There are just 2 left
ME: There are just 2 left
ME: Macedonia, Macedonia
[--- THE NETHERLANDS! ---]
ME: No... one year again no...
--- The 10th finalist is... ---]
ME: Ma-ce-do-nia
[--- AUSTRIA! ---]
-------------------------------------------
Rayman Legends - #Ep. 15 - Medo de Altura - Duration: 12:18.
-------------------------------------------
1430 Telemensagem Dia dos Namorados Para Esposo - Voz Fem. - Duration: 0:45.
-------------------------------------------
Doom Fortress [Team Fortress 2 mod for Doom] - Duration: 10:54.
This is an offline deathmatch against bots on Zandronum 3.0.
Each class has only two or three weapons and most are quite bad against Zandronum bots.
In this case, the best classes for me are the Soldier, Heavy and Pyro.
However, against humans or monsters, this story may be very different.
The available classes are: Scout, Soldier, Heavy, Pyro, Demoman, Engineer, Medic, Sniper and Spy.
This Crazed Gunman is hard to beat...
I didn't test but I imagine that even coop games can be also
fun to play. The player class variety and their different characteristics
may promote interesting and varied gameplay possibilities.
In my humble opinion, it needed, at least, weapons balancing.
Some take too long to reload or have poor accuracy
against quick enemies, like these nasty bots.
This is one more quality Doom mod, considering
that, even though its development started in 2010, it stopped
in this alpha stage, what is such a shame. The project has potential.
Used version: Doom Fortress alpha r112.
-------------------------------------------
Step by step high point without chain cord - Duration: 4:39.
Hello guys on video lesson today I will teach you to work the high point
without the cord chains here I have two parts one I worked with the cord and this
I worked up without the cord which is difference she worked with the cord
It has elasticity above and below it not You have any so I advise when working
with the numbering cord using a needle the greater part of the bead chains, and then
continuing with a smaller needle i.e. the lowest number to the work piece
you are running already worked without it is elastic cord with both below
as above this is a hint that I wanted give it to you and today I will teach you how
performing the high current point without cord so let our video lesson today.
We'll start by putting a ringlet the needle and we'll just go up now
four little chains one Two Three Four will lacing wire will enter the needle in
first little chain that started to bring here in front of the needle will lacing wire
again and cast off just a ringlet throwing it down here and now we will
lacing wire and do our highlight cashing every two wire loop and now I will introduce
the chain on the needle that formed below the first high point will lasso and bring
the wire out front left three ringlet the needle lace and arremato only one playing
Here it down and now I make my point High loop will again next ringlet
which formed the second highlight will lasso bringing the wire out front left three
I will lasso and cast off just playing down and do my high point again
Loop the wire going here next ringlet formed below the third highest point
bring the wire out front left three I will lasso and cast off only one playing
the ringlet down and my work here high point loop wire will insert the needle
the ringlet that formed below the room highlight bring the thread here in front left
three tie and only one playing arremato the ringlet down and do my high point
we will always work that way until the total desired size roping
inserting the needle into the chain on below the high point bringing out front and finishing off
just a ringlet and working point high we working this way until
the desired size good staff I I hope you enjoyed the tip
today there liked click on Channel liked in share this video in the Social Network
if you are not registered in the Channel to subscribe to receive video updates lessons
do not forget to activate the bell that find the screen to be able to also turn
notifications ok good staff for today and only until the next video lesson.
-------------------------------------------
【やっと会えたよ!】スタバのプリン[チョコバナナ]【木下ゆうか】 - Duration: 2:02.
-------------------------------------------
Cambio de imagen a ama de casa ejemplar | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 3:55.
-------------------------------------------
Vecino gruñón puso en riesgo la vida de unos niños | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 0:51.
-------------------------------------------
Subaru Impreza 1.5R Luxury AWD - Duration: 0:54.
-------------------------------------------
Kia Picanto 1.0 CVVT 5-DRS R-Cross 13.000 KM - Duration: 0:57.
-------------------------------------------
Renault Talisman Estate DCI 160 EDC INTENS AUTOMAAT | R-LINK 2 | CLIMATE | PARKING - Duration: 0:57.
-------------------------------------------
Renault Master T35 2.3 dCi L2H2 130PK Euro 6 SCHUIFDEUR L+R /NAV/CAMERA (4893) - Duration: 1:01.
-------------------------------------------
Why Are NUNS Creepy? | Darkology #18 - Duration: 7:54.
In the horror genre, there are many entities that can give a good scare.
So far in Darkology, we've explored the psychology behind what makes old people, children,
clowns, silent films and even bugs so terrifying.
And in this episode, we'll be visiting a holier side and exploring the deeper workings
of what makes nuns so creepy.
In 2016 we got a glimpse at a rather frightening nun in James Wan's "The Conjuring 2".
"Who's that?"
And while there is a spinoff film currently in the works to focus primarily on the Nun
character, it isn't the first time nuns have been used as a vessel for terror.
Here are just some films that feature a mean or creepy nun:
The Blues Brothers.
Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo.
Death Becomes Her.
The Nun (2005).
Species: The Awakening.
And while not a film, the entire second season of American Horror Story takes place in an
insane asylum run by nuns.
"Just remember.
If you look in the face of evil- evil's gonna look right back at you."
Perhaps in some, they trigger phasmophobia, the fear of ghosts.
There's just something ethereal and otherworldly about the manner in which they dress and behave.
The outline of a nun is ghostly.
They're like walking sheets.
The way in which they abstain from modern lifestyles makes them ghosts among us.
They may also trigger demonophobia, which is the fear of demons.
For some, the gothic design of Catholic churches can be unnerving.
Perhaps due to their association with The Devil, and being haunted in horror movies.
Being so closely associated with the church and often seen as possessing a closeness to
the spiritual that borders on an otherworldly level may bring some individuals to suspect
demonic workings at play.
Hollywood has only bolstered this questionable reputation.
"A movie full of fire, sex, and the death of Christians."
I couldn't find any academic terms for the fear of nuns, but some words that have floated
around are "monachousaphobia" and "sphenisciphobia."
Some sites seem to get these two mixed up with the fear of penguins.
I'm not really sure which is correct or if they're both wrong- but it's something
to think about.
Nuns and penguins do have a monochromatic appearance in common.
So they look strange, but what else is there?
One reason could be that they're sometimes seen as mean.
One account I found online had this to say:
"Although I don't have a "phobia", I too have always been frightened by nuns, but with
good reason..
I was raised Catholic and in first grade began my religious instructions every Wednesday
afternoon..
My "teacher" was a horrible, mean, nun who seemed to take great pleasure in terrifying
us at every turn..
She would scream, slam things down, and threaten to hit the children with a ruler..
If that wasn't bad enough, she got on this kick about telling us that every morning when
we left our homes we should make a point of kissing our parents goodbye and telling them
we loved them because by the time we got home again they could be dead!!!!!
I was severely traumatized by that for many, many years and never felt the same about nuns
after that..
"
The fear of nuns might be triggered by algophobia, which is the fear of pain.
Nuns have a reputation for being absolute with punishment which is often depicted in
movies as a swift strike with a ruler stick.
"Get out!
And don't come back... until you've redeemed yourselves."
Or perhaps nuns are more related to scopophobia, the fear of being stared at.
They do appear to be rather judgemental.
Or perhaps it stems from nosocomephobia, the fear of hospitals.
Nuns are often associated with hospitals due to their caring nature.
This fear might stem from the anxiety of losing control once admitted.
There were some other phobias that were a bit farfetch'd but still related to some
degree.
Gynophobia, the fear of women might be connected as nuns are often seen as strict maternal
figures who often do what real mothers won't in the name of discipline.
Melanophobia, the fear of the color black for their choice in wardrobe.
And then there's gerontophobia, the fear of old people.
While nuns aren't all old, a large portion of them, especially depicted in the media,
are seen as older, and their abstinent and strict behavior accentuates this idea.
At the end of the day, I think it has a lot to do with the mystery surrounding their heavily
veiled attire and their alleged just and caring nature.
In a similar way to how clowns have unusual appearances that can mask any evil that might
exist, nuns too have a benevolent agenda that evil can hide behind.
To avoid bias, I looked up some accounts from former nuns on their experiences.
On a reddit forum, I found quite a few stories from former sisters depicting their day-to-day
lives as nuns, that were pretty ordinary.
Nothing strange or creepy.
I was even surprised to read that they drank alcohol and that some of them were not virgins,
something I formerly thought to have been a requirement.
One poster pointed out the stereotype of the angry nun with a ruler and inquired to how
it came about.
Some replies cited private catholic schools.
Another pointed out that:
"It's less common nowadays, since recently almost all nuns choose to become sisters.
In the past, there were more societal reasons that forced young women into that life.
i.e.
In a large Catholic family, it was just expected that the youngest son would join priesthood,
and a few daughters would become nuns.
A large family just wouldn't have the resources to support unmarried daughters, and women
couldn't really live independently."
Another poster replied:
"Being expected to give your life to a cause makes me sick to my soul.
I understand the reasoning and societal constraints that forced this sort of thing, I just don't
like it.
If you join the priesthood, or in my case the military, it should be because you want
to."
There's even a french film from 2013 that tells the story of Suzanne Simonin, a bourgeois
girl in 1765 who is forced to become a nun by her parents.
It's based on a novel by philosopher Denis Diderot, who believed that many in religious
orders were there against their will.
Perhaps this is part of the reason some of us fear nuns- because they represent a lifestyle
that was traditionally forced on its subjects.
Because, they are living representations of truly not being in control of your fate.
Because, they are reminders of not being permitted to be you.
What do you think?
Hey did you learn something new?
Do you have a strange fear that you'd like to learn more about?
Let me know in the comments below!
And be sure to check out the Official Darkology Playlist to learn more psychology in pop culture.
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook at Bluelava6 to stay up to date on the channel or to just
say hello.
My name is Blue Lavasix, and as always- I will see you in the next video.
-------------------------------------------
Trump's Military Buildup Won't Begin Until 2019 - Duration: 4:19.
Trump�s Military Buildup Won�t Begin Until 2019
BY MARCUS WEISGERBER
Pentagon officials say they're working to fix readiness first, then grow the military.
Don�t expect to see President Donald Trump�s promised military buildup kick into gear until
2019, senior Pentagon officials said Tuesday, hours after delivering their 2018 request
to Capitol Hill.
The $639 billion defense spending request � that�s a $574 billion �base budget�
plus $65 billion to fight in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria and send more troops to Europe � tops
the current year�s base-plus-overseas contingency operations total by about $52 billion.
It�s �the next step in rebuilding the armed forces,� acting Pentagon Comptroller
John Roth told reporters at the Pentagon. �That is a significant increased commitment
on the part of this administration to defense spending.�
But it still falls short, according to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, who leads the Senate
Armed Services Committee. Trump�s budget plan is �inadequate to the challenges we
face, illegal under current law, and part of an overall budget proposal that is dead
on arrival in Congress,� McCain said.
Trump�s proposal is $52 billion above federal spending caps mandated by the Budget Control
Act of 2011. Legislative compromise on those caps seems unlikely in the context of the
overall budget proposal, which aims to cut billions of dollars from domestic and safety-net
spending and sets up a fight with congressional Democrats.
During the 2016 campaign, Trump pledged to buy more warships and combat aircraft. Just
days after taking office, the new president signed an executive order at the Pentagon
to underscore his desire to fulfill those campaign promises.
Now four months into his presidency, Pentagon officials say those increases will take time.
�You will not see a growth in force structure� in Trump�s 2018 budget projections, Roth
said. �You will not see a growth in the shipbuilding plan. You will not see a robust
modernization program.�
Instead, Roth and other Pentagon officials have pointed to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis�
three-step approach to rebuild the military. It aims first to fill equipment and training
holes, then to increase the capacity of the military, and finally, to make it more lethal.
Last week, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford told Defense One that he expects the
Pentagon to start buying new weapons in the coming years to meet those goals.
The documents that accompany the Pentagon�s 2018 spending request most lack long-term
projections. Roth said that�s because decisions about future budgets will be shaped by military
strategy reviews now underway.
�The secretary has not spent any time at all looking at anything beyond FY18 to date,
in large part because what we have stood up � is we begun the process of developing
the new defense strategy,� Roth said Tuesday. �The intent and the goal was that that new
defense strategy would inform anything beyond FY19.�
But the acting comptroller said to expect an uptick in Pentagon spending down the road.
Roth said that the relatively flat, long-term defense spending projection released by the
White House �is not the top line that we will be seeking here particularly as we go
to the FY19 budget.�
�That flat line is not informed by strategy and it�s not informed by policy,� he said.
Will Congress would approve Trump�s Pentagon spending proposal?
�I�m actually fairly sanguine,� Roth said. �Actually, a lot of the reaction we�ve
gotten so far from our meetings with some of the members is �Why didn�t you ask
for more?��
-------------------------------------------
Trump's Military Buildup Won't Begin Until 2019 - Duration: 4:19.
Trump�s Military Buildup Won�t Begin Until 2019
BY MARCUS WEISGERBER
Pentagon officials say they're working to fix readiness first, then grow the military.
Don�t expect to see President Donald Trump�s promised military buildup kick into gear until
2019, senior Pentagon officials said Tuesday, hours after delivering their 2018 request
to Capitol Hill.
The $639 billion defense spending request � that�s a $574 billion �base budget�
plus $65 billion to fight in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria and send more troops to Europe � tops
the current year�s base-plus-overseas contingency operations total by about $52 billion.
It�s �the next step in rebuilding the armed forces,� acting Pentagon Comptroller
John Roth told reporters at the Pentagon. �That is a significant increased commitment
on the part of this administration to defense spending.�
But it still falls short, according to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, who leads the Senate
Armed Services Committee. Trump�s budget plan is �inadequate to the challenges we
face, illegal under current law, and part of an overall budget proposal that is dead
on arrival in Congress,� McCain said.
Trump�s proposal is $52 billion above federal spending caps mandated by the Budget Control
Act of 2011. Legislative compromise on those caps seems unlikely in the context of the
overall budget proposal, which aims to cut billions of dollars from domestic and safety-net
spending and sets up a fight with congressional Democrats.
During the 2016 campaign, Trump pledged to buy more warships and combat aircraft. Just
days after taking office, the new president signed an executive order at the Pentagon
to underscore his desire to fulfill those campaign promises.
Now four months into his presidency, Pentagon officials say those increases will take time.
�You will not see a growth in force structure� in Trump�s 2018 budget projections, Roth
said. �You will not see a growth in the shipbuilding plan. You will not see a robust
modernization program.�
Instead, Roth and other Pentagon officials have pointed to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis�
three-step approach to rebuild the military. It aims first to fill equipment and training
holes, then to increase the capacity of the military, and finally, to make it more lethal.
Last week, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford told Defense One that he expects the
Pentagon to start buying new weapons in the coming years to meet those goals.
The documents that accompany the Pentagon�s 2018 spending request most lack long-term
projections. Roth said that�s because decisions about future budgets will be shaped by military
strategy reviews now underway.
�The secretary has not spent any time at all looking at anything beyond FY18 to date,
in large part because what we have stood up � is we begun the process of developing
the new defense strategy,� Roth said Tuesday. �The intent and the goal was that that new
defense strategy would inform anything beyond FY19.�
But the acting comptroller said to expect an uptick in Pentagon spending down the road.
Roth said that the relatively flat, long-term defense spending projection released by the
White House �is not the top line that we will be seeking here particularly as we go
to the FY19 budget.�
�That flat line is not informed by strategy and it�s not informed by policy,� he said.
Will Congress would approve Trump�s Pentagon spending proposal?
�I�m actually fairly sanguine,� Roth said. �Actually, a lot of the reaction we�ve
gotten so far from our meetings with some of the members is �Why didn�t you ask
for more?��
-------------------------------------------
Nissan QASHQAI 1.6 DIG-T 163PK CONNECT EDIT. | DESIGN PACK | XENON | NL AUTO - Duration: 0:42.
-------------------------------------------
Opel Mokka 1.4 T Cosmo 4x4 // Trekhaak / Schuif- kanteldak / Leder / Navi / Stoel- en stuurverwarmin - Duration: 0:54.
-------------------------------------------
Audi TT TTS Roadster 2.0 T TTS Pro Line - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Opel Astra 1.4t 150pk Automaat, MOOISTE VAN NL! - Duration: 0:57.
-------------------------------------------
Opel Mokka 1.4 T COSMO (Leder-Schuifkanteldak) - Duration: 0:59.
-------------------------------------------
Nissan QASHQAI 1.2 115pk DIG-T Connect Edition - Duration: 1:00.
-------------------------------------------
Alfa Romeo Giulietta 1.4 T DISTINCTIVE - Duration: 0:58.
-------------------------------------------
I don't know what I want to do when I grow up | Daily Sprout 239 - Duration: 0:53.
-------------------------------------------
Lawsuit: Zillow 'Zestimates' Are Wrong, Preventing Homes From Selling | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:55.
WAY OFF DRIVING DOWN OFFERING AND THEY ARE SUING.
JO LING KENT EXPLAINS. >> Reporter: BARBARA SAYS THE INTERNET IS
SCARING OFF BUYERS. >> IT'S A HUGE ROAD BLOCK TO SELLING THE
HOUSE. >> Reporter: AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR,
POPULAR ONLINE REAL ESTATE COMPANY ZILLOW ESTIMATED HER HOME'S
VALUE WAS $652,000. A FEW MONTHS LATER IT PLUMMETED BY $116,000,
LANDING AT $90,000 BELOW HER ASKING PRICE.
>> THERE IS NO ABILITY TO TELL ZILLOW STAY AWAY FROM MY PROPERTY.
>> Reporter: THERE ARE 110 MILLION HOMES ON ZILLOW.
IT'S OFTEN WHERE PEOPLE ENCOUNTER THE FIRST VALUE.
SHE IS SUING ALLEGING THEY ARE ILLEGAL APPRAISALS AND VIOLATE
CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS. ZILLOW SAYS IT'S
WITHOUT MERIT AND REFUSES TO REMOVE HOME PRICES AT BUYBUYER'S
REQUEST BECAUSE IT'S GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS.
>> LISTING AGENTS PUT OPINIONS ON HOMES AND BUYING AGENTS PUT
OPINIONS ON HOMES AND SO DOES ZILLOW. >> Reporter: THIS
WEEK, ZILLOW LAUNCHED A $1 MILLION COMPETITION FOR A
BETTER ALGA RHYTHM TO PROTECT HOME PRICES. THE COMPANY SAYS THE
CONTEST IS NOT A RESPONSE TO THE LAWSUIT AND CURRENT
ZESTIMATES HAVE AN ERROR RATE OF 5%. >> THEY CAN BE OFF BY
AS LITTLE AS 2 OR 3% AND AS MUCH AS 40%. >> Reporter: LOS
ANGELES REALTOR SAYS ZILLOW ESTIMATES CAN BE HIGHER OR LOWER
THAN THE ESTIMATE.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Landed In Belgium And Instantly This Happened, That Has The World Cheering! - Duration: 2:19.
Trump Landed In Belgium And Instantly This Happened, That Has The World Cheering!
By Stacy Law
President Trump is now visiting Belgium in his whirlwind first trip abroad.
Brussels Belgium is where the headquarters is for NATO, or the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization.
It�s also a place that President Trump once called a �hellhole� due to its failure
to prevent terrorist attacks.
It has also been a breeding ground for terrorists.
But our President is there now, and doing what he does best: leading!
Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel said that his talks with President Trump have focused
mostly on fighting terrorism.
He also described his conversations with President Trump as �cordial, respectful and very direct.�
Very direct.
That�s our President!
He doesn�t mince words, or dance around with political correctness, like some former
Presidents (ummm�Obama) did!
No. Trump gets straight to the point.
We need leadership in the fight against the kind of terror that happened in Manchester
this week.
And leadership is what we have in President Trump!
So what is NATO going to do?
According to the Wall Street Journal, �NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the
alliance will create a new group within the new intelligence division solely focused on
the threats posed by foreign fighters and improve intelligence-sharing and coordination.
It will also expand the role of its Awacs surveillance planes to help coordinate flights
over Turkey and will provide more air-to-air refueling.�
Trump is working hard for us, bringing skilled leadership to the table, and scrapping political
correctness.
All in his efforts to Make America Great Again.
I, for one, am so proud!
If you are proud too, please show it by sharing this everywhere, so everyone knows what our
President is really doing, not what the media would have you believing.
-------------------------------------------
µ's Final Love Live! - NO EXIT ORION - Printemps [Eng/Esp subs] - Duration: 4:13.
I don't know your true feelings
You forget and mistake our promises
I want to know but I'm scared
The me that's smiling like always is quite cruel
Please don't give me a ranking
I want you to tell me that I'm the only one
Constellation of winter please give me strength
And invite you to the Orion with no exit
I want to confirm this love under this night sky with just the two of us
Who else do you need? You can't decide that you don't need me
I won't let you exit, from the darkness
You can't escape you can't escape please...
My passion can't be stopped
It's bigger and stronger than yours
From the start
I felt that it would be a painful dream. But the brakes were already broken
Throw away everything except me
I want you to tell me that's your only wish
Even though the frozen sighs were calling your name
They closely missed the lights of Sirius in the frozen sky
After the sun rises will this love disappear?
Please don't let me think that this is nothing but an illusion
I love you I love you please tell me the painful truth
I won't run away I won't run away please...
After the sun rises will this love disappear?
Please don't let me think that this is nothing but an illusion
Constellation of winter please give me strength
And invite you to the Orion with no exit
I want to confirm this love under this night sky with just the two of us
Who else do you need? You can't decide that you don't need me
I won't let you exit from the darkness
You can't escape you can't escape please...
-------------------------------------------
【やっと会えたよ!】スタバのプリン[チョコバナナ]【木下ゆうか】 - Duration: 2:02.
-------------------------------------------
Colleen Lopez 5.08ctw PrincessCut Blue Topaz Ring - Duration: 3:22.
-------------------------------------------
Online Discussion: Is It Serving You? - Duration: 6:58.
Hey guys, welcome back to my channel.
I just put up, uploaded, um, video about staying positive, and it was funny because that video
was actually filmed a couple of weeks ago, because like I told you guys, I've been filming
a little bit in advance.
When I go to edit videos that are from a couple of weeks ago, I'm like.
I'm just, it's changed so much, you know, like I change very fast, I go through a lot
of stuff, so I'm not sure this filming in advance thing is working for me or not, but
I think it might work with certain topics that aren't really relevant to being in a
certain moment.
So we'll see how it goes.
But anyway, the last video I put up, was all this, I was on a, I was super into like, talking
about being positive, uh, how it's been changing my life, and it has, very much.
And it was just weird because I feel like right after I put up that video, I just felt
like all kinds of stuff started happening to like, bring me down.
I'm not gonna get into what it all is, just minor stuff, disagreements with people, a
lot of arguing with people online, and not fully comfortable accepting that goodness,
I think is what it is, and I think on some subconscious level there's all these fears
that something is gonna mess it up, and then we like, attract more of like, people that
are trying to challenge us in whatever ways of things about ourselves that are uncomfortable.
And the thing I'm most uncomfortable with about myself, is the fact that I don't fit
in, so it's just interesting how like, I was really vibrating very high, feeling great,
feeling on a great path, and then I right away attract these convos--either attract
or subsconciously get myself into these discussions that make me feel awful.
I mean, they don't make me feel like a bad person, they just make me feel like, completely
not understood by at least certain groups of people.
I know to some degree I do it to myself.
I'm going through another really big time of inner work and changing things and accountability
and I'm trying to see like ... I know I'm doing it to myself in some way because I seek
out discussions with people, I think just because I'm interested and it's stimulating
to me.
But the thing I've really come to see is just a lot of--I have to really think about what
serves me.
Because, there's discussions--it's kind of like what I was saying in the last video about
venting.
A lot of times we vent, and we think we have the right to vent, and we're mad, and we've
gotta like, vent out our emotions, and we have to say how we feel about stuff, and we
feel like we have the right to say how we feel about stuff, because someone's being
stupid to us, or someone's saying stupid crap to us, or someone's being mean to us, or something,
judging us unfairly, or, I don't know, criticizing us for the way we look, or something, there's
so many things it could be, you know?
But um, we often feel like we have the right to vent.
And we do have the right to vent or do whatever we want to do, but how much is that venting
really serving us, versus just making us focus on the bad, and feel bad.
So that was kind of the topic of my last video, and this is kind of similar in the sense that
it's like, seeking out online discussions with people, how much is it serving us?
And sometimes it might.
Sometimes you might want to learn something, sometimes you might be looking for someone
to help you change your mind about something.
Sometimes, you might just be trying to gain more compassion for someone else, uh, even
if they're very different than you.
If you go into an online discussion with a positive attitude, with wanting to truly understand
the people you're debating or discussing things with, you know, I think that could be a beautiful
thing.
And I'm sure that there will be times in the future that I do that again, and usually when
I do engage in online discussions, I try my best to be respectful, I try my best to understand,
and recently I had a big online clash I guess you could say with people.
I'm not gonna get into the subject matter of what it is because the entire point of
this video is how I want to stop doing this.
And I was kind of arguing back and forth and talking with these people for a while and
it was starting to become really clear that I don't agree with them, and I, well it was
clear from the beginning that I don't.
And I felt like...
It was hard for me, and it took me a while of thinking about it to really begin to process
why it was bothering me so much, and then I eventually figured out that what was bothering
me was that I don't think any of these people were open minded to learning anything about
my point of view.
I think they were ready to tell me I was wrong.
And I think they think their opinions are facts.
And this is sadly true for ... most, for many, it's true for a lot, and I really try to not
be this way.
I don't know if you guys remember, and first of all, let me just say, I'm not perfect at
this, there's been times I've said mean things to people online, there's been times I've
talked as if my way was the right way, I understand that.
Why like I made that whole video right after the election saying that we should try to
talk to Trump supporters and give them a chance to explain to us where they were coming from,
because it's not right to just say that our way is the right way, even if it seems insane
to us.
And like I said, I struggle with this, because I get very, very mad sometimes, and feel that
there is one right way, and that we're basically being destroyed by people who are going against
what's right.
I am not gonna change anyone's mind.
This discussion the other day, it really just showed me like, no one is gonna listen to
me, they don't care, and if they don't care, they don't care.
They have a right to not care.
It doesn't matter that they don't care.
What I need to do is stop getting into stressful, upsetting, negative conversations with people
who are not going to understand where I'm coming from, who clearly are not going to
make an effort to understand, and they're not open to ideas that aren't their own.
And I'm not even saying these particular people I was talking to.
I just mean like, anybody for the most part.
I mean, at this point, I guess the whole point I'm trying to say is that I'm realizing these
online discussions do not serve me, they bring me down, they continually manifest the feeling
that I've had my whole life, that I don't fit in, and that's a hard thing.
You know, this is a reason I have a lot of clashes.
Everything we do, we have to take inventory, and we have to be like, is this serving me?
I do think it serves me to say what I need to say, but I don't think that the back and
forth, like any sort of arguing, like I can just say what I need to say and then walk
out.
I mean, no one can make you discuss something.
Even if you became super famous, an interviewer could ask you, and you could just be like,
no comment.
I mean you don't have to talk about any kind of sensitive issue you don't want to talk
about.
So, I'll observe, and I'll listen to what people have to say, but I'm not going to give
my input.
But the good thing is, plenty of people do understand me, plenty of people tell me all
the time that they get where I'm coming from.
I'm going to be doing what makes me happy, what makes me feel vibrationally high and
good.
And that's what it's about, so yeah.
Wish the same for you guys, and thank you for listening to this.
I hope it made some sense and I don't know if anybody knows where I'm coming from.
But yeah, I love you guys, and I will see you guys in my next video.
-------------------------------------------
La Crosse school officials prepare for Summer Food Service Program - Duration: 0:44.
-------------------------------------------
The Nationals: Not A Friend Of Firearms Owners - Duration: 4:01.
Mr Deputy President, I rise tonight to speak on behalf of the nearly one million licensed
shooters and hunters in this country.
At present, the Firearms and Weapons Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 is set to be debated in
this Parliament next week.
We are still working through the Bill, and will obviously have more to say when it comes
before us.
As I've said many times, our policy on firearms law is based on a fundamental fact – criminals
do not obey the law.
Aside from firearms licensing, including background checking, and safe storage, there is no scientific,
social or economic basis for continuing the 'Howard' approach to firearms regulation.
This approach only serves to further demonise and vilify law-abiding firearm owners, while
the finite resources of police could be much better spent on targeting criminals rather
than law-abiding citizens.
The obsession with over regulation and demonising law-abiding firearm owners in this country
has put the handbrake on any meaningful, fair and practical reform.
Most Members on both sides of politics will happily toe the Howard line on firearms laws,
and some may be very loose with the truth, disseminate misinformation, and scare the
community to suit their own political agenda.
In no other area of law do these members exercise such furious political opportunism and scare
mongering than on firearms matters.
We have some members on both sides of the political divide jumping over each other to
see who will restrict firearms ownership more.
Yesterday's coronial report into the dreadful Lindt Café inquiry made no mention of legally-owned
firearms, or lever-action shotguns being involved whatsoever, despite this being the basis for
former Prime Minister [Tony] Abbott's nonsensical ban on lever-action shotguns, after initially
claiming that Man Monis was a licensed shooter.
A particularly dangerous and ill-conceived policy that came into effect under this government
was the Ammo Bill.
The mandatory manual recording of a person's name and address when that person is purchasing
ammunition is a huge threat to the community's safety and was a direct attack on every licensed
shooter by Barry O'Farrell.
He did it on purpose.
He knew shooters homes would be invaded and lives put at risk.
It has created hundreds of criminal shopping lists across the State.
What O'Farrell also realised, but didn't care to have regard to, was the enormous risk
and liability he was imposing on law-abiding firearm dealers with no effect on crime reduction
whatsoever.
He was happy to see our supporters placed at risk.
As such, we welcome the proposed changes in the upcoming Firearms Bill that will remove
the recording of address details and the transition of this process into a digital system, with
no paper trail.
However, it doesn't go far enough: this government must go further and abolish it
all.
There are a lot of other evidence-based sensible changes that can be made to firearm laws that
will improve community safety and provide fairer outcomes for licensed shooters doing
the right thing.
Primarily, we want to establish a Firearms Ombudsman, clear the recording of all ammunition
sales, make suppressors easily available for licensed shooters, remove paintball markers
from the Firearms Act, and establish family and home protection as a genuine reason for
firearms ownership, to mention just a few.
It's all well and good that certain State and Federal Coalition members make positive
noises and take photos with licensed shooters, but their record proves otherwise.
The Nationals in particular should be ashamed on their record on firearms control.
They rolled over in 1996, when Tim Fischer sold out firearms owners by backing Howard's
draconian gun laws.
They rolled over in 2002, when they backed the handgun reforms.
They rolled over in 2012, when they sided with The Greens to back the Ammo Bill.
And they rolled over again in 2013, when they shut down the Game Council and public land
hunting.
The Liberal-National-Green Coalition on firearms issues have never been, and never will be
friends of licensed shooters and hunters.
They are not a party of freedom anymore.
They are a party of restriction, control and discrimination.
We at the Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party will always put the interests of our constituents
above all else.
-------------------------------------------
New developments in Ray Tensing retrial - Duration: 3:29.
.
>> A BRAND-NEW SET UP FOR THIS
YEAR'S FESTIVAL.>> Reporter:
LANE I'LL OFFER YOU A
CONTROVERSIAL T-SHIRT WAS RULED
OUT AS EVIDENCE.
RESTRICTIONS ON THE MEDIA.
AND THE JUDGE RULED BOTH THE
DEFENSE VIDEO EXPERTS ARE
ALLOWED TO TESTIFY IN THE
TRIAL.
I'M JOINED NOW BY THE ATTORNEY
FOR MORE PERSPECTIVE AND
INSIGHT OF TODAY'S TRIAL.
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
I WANT TO START WITH THE SHIRT.
IT WAS ALLOWED IN THE FIRST
CHILD NOT A SECOND TROUT--TRIAL.
>> TO FOCUS ON THE EVIDENCE
THAT IS PRESENTED IN THE TRIAL.
NOT ONLY NEWSPAPERS, NEWS,
SOCIAL MEDIA.
THE EVIDENCE IS THE EVIDENCE
USED TO WEIGH THE GUILTY OR
INNOCENT OF THE ACCUSED.
WITH RESPECT TO THE JURORS YOU
WILL GO ON EVIDENCE OF THE
CHILD.>> AND THE REALITY.
>> YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO USE YOUR
OWN SET OF VALUES, PERSONAL
BELIEFS AND YOU BRING US TO THE
COURTROOM.
BUT ASK YOU TO SET THE SITE.
AND FOCUS ON THE EVIDENCE THAT
IS PRESENTED IN THE TRIAL.
DOES THAT MEAN YOU STILL HAVE
YOUR OWN, WELL YOU KNOW YOU
THINK-BUT YOU FOLLOW THE RULES
INSTRUCTED BY THE COURT.
AND RIGHT NOW THERE IS T-SHIRT.
>> AND HOW DOES THAT LOOK GOING
FORWARD??
WE ARE GOING TO TRY TO HAVE THE
JURORS FOCUS ON THE FACT THAT
THIS YOUNG MAN AS AN OFFICER
WAS AFRAID FOR HIS LIFE.
HE WAS A RACIAL AND HE WAS
TRYING TO ATTACK ANYONE FOR THE
COLOR OF THEIR SKIN.
BUT THE ESSENCE OF THE TEACHER
IS MORE EVIDENCE THAT THE
PROSECUTION CANNOT TALK ABOUT.
EVEN THOUGH IS THERE AND THE
MEDIA POOL IMAGERY COALESCING
THE MEDIA COVERS.
>> SETTING ASIDE A NOMINEE THAT
HAS BEEN TALKED ABOUT.
THE COVERAGE OF THE TRIAL.
SO WHAT ARE THE RAMIFICATIONS
OF THAT?
>> IS USED IN, THE COURT OF CREW
--APPEALS IS RESTRICTED FOR NOW
WHAT HAPPENED IS THAT THE COURT
CAN'T TAKE AWAY THAT RIGHT
WITHOUT DUE PROCESS.
EVERYONE MADE THEIR RESPECTIVE
ARGUMENT.
THEY MAY SAY NO MEDIA OR LEASE A
YOU KNOW WHAT AS LONG AS WE CAN
PUT IN THINGS THAT WE MAKE SURE
THE JURORS WILL SEE.
THIS REALLY WAS ALL ABOUT.
SO THE IDENTITIES WILL BE
COMPROMISED ANOTHER FAMILY SAFE
AND THAT THEY CAN TAKE THE OATH
AND DO THEIR JOB.
CELESTE REALLY WHAT THE JUDGE
-------------------------------------------
YOU NEED A MAN- Latest 2017 Nigerian Nollywood Ghallywood Full Movie - Duration: 47:35.
-------------------------------------------
YI 4K+ vs GoPro Hero5 black vs YI 4K - EIS and Audio Test - Duration: 5:01.
Hi everyone, today I'm testing 3 action cameras
GoPro Hero 5 black, YI 4k+ Action Camera
and YI 4K Action Camera.
This is an audio comparison and all cameras
are outside an underwater case.
Well, GoPro Hero5 black doesn't need
an underwater case as the camera is
waterproof itself.
YI 4K plus Action Camera has a new audio settings option
called "Wind". And as you can see it is windy up here.
So I wanted to test the difference to
YI 4K Action Camera
which doesn't feature this option.
So what's the difference between these cameras?
GoPro Hero 5 black is the only camera that is
waterproof without the case.
YI4K+ Action Camera is the only camera that offers
4k with 60 frames per second (fps) and
electronic image stabilization (EIS) up to 4k
and 30 fps (frames per second)
The maximum for EIS (electronic image stabilization)
on YI 4K Action Camera and
GoPro Hero5 black is 2.7K with 30 fps (frames per seconds).
That's a short audio comparison,
and now let's get some action footage!
I did the ride twice and one time
I switch on electronic image stabilisation
on YI 4K plus action camera
at 4k with 30 frames per seconds.
The second time I switched it off.
Notice that the field of view (FOV) changes a bit
if you switch on electronic image stabilization
as the field of view gets
a little narrower as more sensor space is needed
to stabilize the image.
In the previous audio tests all action cameras
were outside the underwater case.
But now I place the cameras inside the
underwater case, except of course
GoPro Hero5 black because it's the only action camera
that is waterproof without a case.
But I also want to compare YI 4K Action camera
inside the underwater case.
And how it compares to YI 4K+ Action Camera
to see if there is an improvement
when a camera is placed inside the
underwater case.
And there is another small detail,
whereas GoPro Hero5 black
and YI 4K+ Action Camera have a USB-C port
YI 4K action camera has a microUSB port
and therefore is the only camera
among those three that doesn't offer an
external microphone!
I hope you enjoyed this video. I for sure enjoyed the ride
on this rollercoaster. See you soon!
No comments:
Post a Comment