Youtube daily report w Oct 19 2017

Hello and welcome to another video for programming in R. In this video we will be taking a look at how to read in and write out

data using the read.table and write.table functions.

So let's start by taking a look at the read.table function.

So we can see from the help menu that first we're going to have indicate file. Now file is going to correspond

to the file path, the file name, as well as the .file type.

We're also going to have to see if we have headers or not in our file. By default, set to false, so we can skip this if we notice that

there are no headers in our file. There is also this "sep" option which is for the separator or delimiter.

And we can see by default it is going to be set to a space.

If its something different, then we'll have to change it too would ever type is necessary;

and there some other options as well but we're just going to be focusing on the first three.

So let's now take a look at the file and see if we can get some of this information. Now the

example that I have here is just sitting in my R_is_Awesome folder which is on my desktop.

But let's first take a look at inside this file. Now looking at the file we can see that there doesn't look to be any headers and that each

piece of information here is separated

by a comma. To get our other information let's close the file

and take a look at some of the properties here.

You can see that this is can be a .txt or a text file.

And the location here, the path to this file, is also shown. So I'm just going to copy this, make typing a little easier,

close that out, return over here, and now let's use the function to read in the data. So I'm just going to use a generic dat,

this is what I want to save it as,

to call on read.table,

and then the first piece will be the file. You'll want to make sure that you put this file path in parentheses or single quotes.

every time. And the other thing you'll have to make sure that you do in R especially with a PC is that you have

these slashes turned the other way.

And the reason for that is that R is going to recognize that as an escape character

when it comes to strings; so it's going to be really confused.

So there's the file path, now we also have to indicate the name of the file; 'airports'.

and was a .txt. You have to make sure that you put in the file type as well.

Alright, the next piece; well we can skip the header because by default it was false.

The next piece is gonna be the separator, and remember that it was a comma. You also want to make

sure that you put that into either single or double brackets.

You'll notice that it populated 'dat' into our work environment,

and if we take a look inside it looks like over 8,000 observations. It might seem like that's a lot, but this is really a smaller size

file which this function can handle.

Now if it was a very, very large

type of file you're probably going to want to use a more efficient function from a package, but for this it's sufficient. We can also

view the contents inside and kinda

give it a look over to make sure everything appears to be reading in correctly. It looks like there are some missing bits of information

but that hasn't kind of mixed everything up, so everything looks to be pretty good.

Let's take a look at writing out a dataset.

And go on ahead and copy and

paste that up here into the editor. Let's say that after we read this in we do something

to this

dataset. And then we want to save that result so just to something simple; I'll call it dat.out, and lets say that it's just a subset

of this dataset.

So lets say I wanted all rows

fourth and fifth columns

and lets take a look to see if that looks like that makes sense and everything looks pretty good

So lets say that we want to write this out. So returning over here to help menu

we put in write.table

we'll see that first piece here is "x". So "x" is going to be the object which is going to be written out

the next piece is going to be the same file component. Except now it's going be where do you write it out to, and the

other couple things here we're not going to focus on, but the separator piece is something we will take a look at again. Something else

I want to make mention of here is that whenever you use the read.table that it's going to be writing in

the dataset as a data frame, and we can see this if I return back to data.table

and see that it would read it in and creates a data frame. Okay, so lets call upon

write.table function

and we're gonna write out

dat.out

We use that same file path but we're gonna want to make sure that we change the name, right? Because if we didn't then we'd

just be writing right over top of our original dataset which wouldn't be a very good thing. And lets just call it subset.

Lets also say that the

we don't want to save it as a txt file. Let's say that we're going to save it as a csv, right?

Just another format. If you're going to use a csv file format then, of course, you're going to want the separator to be a comma. So if we go

on ahead and write that out. And we go back to our folder

we'll see that now this new file has been written out. And if we open this up

we're going to see that it doesn't quite look the way that we wanted it to, right? Instead of having just those two columns

it looks like we have these

two headers, but now we have this column of just

numbers here and that's because we forgot to indicate that we did not want

the row names which were just these numbers running down the side of it.

So let's go on ahead and fix that.

And we'll fix that by

taking a look at the options here

and notice that there's this row.names = True by default.

We'll go back in here

and say maybe that's looking a little long, so I'll go down to the next line because R is going to ignore

any spacing as long as you're within the function call. We'll say row.names

equals false.

We're going to see that it comes up with an error.

and that's because I still have the file open,

so close that file.

Then run it, comeback, open it up, and we'll see that now everything

appears to be the way it should be even with the space in here. Now, this isn't the only file type

you can write out as. We could keep that as a txt

and we could for some reason use just a space

that will work as well.

We write this out

we'll see that now there's this other file that's been created, another subset, but it's a different file format so it didn't replace the other

one. If we open up we can see that now it is space separated rather than comma

separated. So that concludes this video on reading in a dataset and writing out a dataset. Hope you found this useful, and happy coding!

For more infomation >> R - Importing Data and Writing Files - Duration: 8:44.

-------------------------------------------

Republican: Emergency Rooms Shouldn't Treat Everyone - Duration: 6:41.

A GOP LAWMAKER THINKS IT'S A BAD IDEA THAT PEOPLE HAVE TO GET

TREATED IF THEY GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

IN FACT, SHE

THINKS THAT WE COULD SAVE DOCTORS IN THIS WHOLE HEALTHCARE

SYSTEM A LOT OF MONEY IF WE DIDN'T HAVE TO TREAT EVERYONE

THE SHUTTLE TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

THIS IS REPRESENTATIVE

DIANE BLACK.

SHE IS IN TENNESSEE AND SHE WAS SPEAKING

TO CHUCK TODD ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND I WANT YOU TO HEAR FROM

HER AND WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY.

TAKE A LOOK THAT.

YOU ARE BEING FORCED INTO FIGURING OUT HOW TO

SUBSIDIZE THAT FREE HEALTHCARE THAT NOBODY PAYS FOR AT THE

EMERGENCY ROOM DOCTOR.

LET ME TELL YOU, CHUCK THAT I AM AN EMERGENCY ROOM NURSE.

THEIR PEOPLE CAME INTO MY EMERGENCY ROOM THAT I, THE NURSE

WAS THE FIRST ONE TO SEE THEM THAT I COULD'VE SENT THEM TO A

WALK-IN CLINIC OR THEIR DOCTOR THE NEXT DAY BUT BECAUSE OF A

LAW THAT CONGRESS PUT INTO PLACE TO SAY NO, I HAVE TO TREAT

EVERYONE THAT WALKS INTO THE EMERGENCY ROOM, YOU TOOK AWAY

OUR ABILITY TO SAY NO.

AN EMERGENCY ROOM IS NOT THE

PROPER PLACE.

AND THEN HE PUT A BURDEN ON TOP OF THAT TO SAY YOU MUST DO THAT.

AND YOU WOULD GET RID OF THE LAW THAT MANDATES EMERGENCY

ROOMS TO SEE EVERY PATIENT THAT SHOWS UP.

I WOULD GET RID OF A LAW THAT SAYS YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED AS

A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL TO MAKE THAT DECISION ABOUT

WHETHER SOMEONE CAN BE APPROPRIATELY TREATED THE

NEXT DAY OR AT A WALK-IN CLINIC OR AT THEIR DOCTOR.

SO I ACTUALLY THINK THAT IF ALL YOU HEARD WAS THAT YOU MIGHT

WALK AWAY THINKING, THAT SEEMS REASONABLE.

THAT IS A PERSON

WHO PRACTICED THIS AS A NURSE AND KNOWS WHAT IT IS AND SHE

SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE HER JUDGMENT AND IF SOMEBODY

CAME IN WITH THE FLU YOU COULD SAY HEY, YOU KNOW WHAT?

COME TO THE CLINIC TOMORROW INSTEAD OF TAKING UP SPACE IN

THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

BUT THAT'S IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF

IT AND AS A CONGRESSWOMAN NOW RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR, SHE SHOULD

KNOW IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER AND THE CONSEQUENCES THAT COULD FLOW

FROM IT.

THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY SIGNED THE LAW INTO THE

EFFECT WAS A WELL-KNOWN LIBERAL NAMED RONALD REAGAN.

IT WAS THE

EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT.

I'M GOING TO

PSYCHOACTIVE LABOR IN THE SECOND BUT THE REASON THEY DID IT IS

BECAUSE BACK IN THE DAY HOSPITALS WOULD DO WITH A CALLED

PATIENT DUMPING.

SOMEONE WALKING TO THE HOSPITAL AND THEY

WOULD GO HE DOESN'T HAVE INSURANCE AND IT IS GOING TO

COST A LOT AND THEY WOULD JUST REFUSE TO TREAT HIM AND THEY

WOULD EITHER JUST DRIVE THEM OUT TO THE STREET AND SAY GOODBYE

AND GOOD LUCK OR THEY WOULD MAKE IT THIS DIFFERENT HOSPITAL TAKE

THEM AND THEY KEPT DOING THIS PATIENT DUMPING TO THE POINT

THAT CONGRESS HAD TO PASS THE LAW AND REAGAN SIGNED INTO

EFFECT.

SO BEFORE YOU GO RUNNING AROUND TALKING ABOUT,

THEY TOOK MY FREEDOM AWAY TO DENY YOU HEALTHCARE.

LOOK INTO

IT A LITTLE BIT AND FIND OUT, NORMALLY I THINK OF THE LAWS

OUTRAGEOUS, THERE MUST'VE BEEN A GOOD REASON FOR THAT MAYBE AT

SOME POINT, LET ME FIND OUT WHY DOTS AND SHE DIDN'T OF COURSE DO

THAT AND ACTIVE LABOR PART IS BECAUSE WOMEN WOULD, IN PREGNANT

IN THE MIDDLE OF LABOR AND HOSPITALS WOULD DUMP THEM ANYWAY

IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE INSURANCE AND SO THAT IS WHY EVEN THE

PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT WAS LIKE THAT IS A FETUS.

THAT IS THE ONE

THING WE CARE ABOUT.

AND YOU ARE SENDING THEM AWAY IN THE MIDDLE OF LABOR?

THAT CAN COST OR MEND HIS PROBLEM SO THAT IS WHERE

THEY PASS THE LAWN THE FIRST PLACE.

THAT IS WHY THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.

YOU ARE GIVING HER THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT IN SAYING

THAT MAYBE SHE DOESN'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF WHY THIS LAW WASN'T

ACTED IN THE FIRST PLACE, BUT I THINK EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY

SOMEONE WHO'S A CURRENT LAWMAKER KNOWS THAT EMERGENCY ROOM'S END

UP SERVING AS A LAST RESORT FOR THE POOR WHO HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE

TO PROVIDE OR PAY FOR HEALTHCARE, WHO HAVEN'T HAD

ACCESS TO HEALTH INSURANCE AND SO THEIR HEALTH CONDITIONS GET

SO BAD THAT THEY END UP IN EMERGENCY ROOMS.

YEAH, THEY

SHOULD BE SEEN BY DOCTORS IF THEY SHOW UP TO THE EMERGENCY

ROOM AND LOOK, MAYBE I AM TOO REAL AND MAYBE I SEE THE DARK

SIDE OF HUMANITY A LITTLE TOO MUCH BUT I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO

BE THE ARBITER OF WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE DESERVES CARE THAT

MOMENT.

SO SHE BRINGS UP SOMEONE WHO HAS A SORE THROAT

FOR A WEEK OR SOMEONE WHOM I HAVE THE FLU BUT I AM NOT BUYING

FOR A SECOND THAT THOSE ARE THE ONLY INDIVIDUALS THAT WOULD BE

TURNED AWAY.

WE ALL KNOW THAT MORE PEOPLE WOULD BE TURNED AWAY

FOR MORE SERIOUS CONDITIONS AND SOMETIMES YOU GO TO THE

EMERGENCY ROOM NOT KNOWING WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU AND MAYBE

THE SYMPTOMS DON'T SEEM THAT SERIOUS TO THE PERSON YOU ARE

DESCRIBING IT TO THAT IT MIGHT END UP BEING SOMETHING

INCREDIBLY SERIOUS.

WHAT IF YOU JUST GOT HIT IN THE HEAD AND YOU ARE WORRIED

THAT YOU'RE GOING TO SUFFER A CONCUSSION?

THESE ARE THINGS YOU SHOULD BE TREATED FOR AND SO WHEN YOU KNOW

THE HISTORY AND WHEN YOU KNOW THAT DEMOGRAPHIC THAT TYPICALLY

ENDS UP IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM, YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THAT LAW

WASN'T ACTED IN THE FIRST PLACE BUT BY THE WAY, ANOTHER THING I

WANTED TO STAY IS THAT IF YOU ARE A HOSPITAL THAT IS NOT

RECEIVING ANY MEDICARE FUNDS, YOU CAN TURN PEOPLE AWAY.

IT IS

TO SIT IF YOU ARE RECEIVING TAXPAYER MONEY, YOU CAN'T DO IT.

YOU CAN'T TURN IT AWAY.

SO IF YOU ARE GENUINELY AGAINST THIS

TYPE OF LAW AND YOU DON'T WANT TO ABIDE BY IT THEN STOP

RECEIVING MEDICARE MONEY AND THEN HE CAN GO AHEAD AND

PATIENT.

AS MUCH AS YOU WANT.

HERE IN LA AND OUR HEALTHCARE

PLAN WE HAVE URGENT CARE AS OPPOSED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

IS FOR LIGHTER STUFF THAT HAPPENS TO YOU AND I LOVE IT

BECAUSE EVERYBODY OF COURSE KNOWS THE LINES IN THE EMERGENCY

ROOM.

IT'S A REAL HASSLE.

WE KNOW THAT THAT IS A REAL ISSUE

SO URGENT CARE HAS COME UP NOW AND THAT'S MUCH BETTER IN THE

SYSTEM.

SO WE'RE NOT SAYING THAT THE LINES IN THE EMERGENCY

ROOM ARE NOT AN ISSUE BUT REMEMBER, IT'S NOT LIKE THE

TREATMENT REQUIRES YOU TO TAKE SEVEN HOURS WITH THE PERSON.

THEY JUST HAVE A SORE THROAT AND THEY SAT THERE WHATEVER THEY HAD

TO SIT THROUGH AND THEY GOT TO YOU SAY OKAY IS A BILL FOR YOUR

THROAT AND WE'RE DONE WITH IT.

IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ARE MANDATED

TO DO ANYTHING ELSE.

IN FACT, IT WOULD PROBABLY TAKE YOU

ALMOST THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME TO DISMISS THAT.

BECAUSE HOW DO

YOU KNOW IF THEY HAVE A SORE THROAT OR THEY DON'T.

WHICH LEADS TO THE STORY OF MINE WHICH IS PRETTY TRAGIC.

REALLY

GOOD FRIEND OF MINE.

FATHER OF HIS WAS IN TURKEY AND EXISTENCE

OF WHAT COULD GO WRONG.

HIS FATHER WAS INVOLVED IN AN

ACCIDENT AND THE DOCTORS LOOKED AT HIM AND THOUGHT HE WAS FINE.

IT TURNS OUT THEY WERE NEGLIGENT.

HE WASN'T FINE.

HE HAD INTERNAL BLEEDING AND HE DIED.

SO THAT IS WHY, WHEN YOU

GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM YES, SOMEONE SHOULD TAKE A COUPLE

MINUTES OUT TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE OKAY AND NOT DUMP YOU ON THE

STREETS AND GO I AM USING MY GOOD JUDGMENT TO MAKE SURE I

DON'T TREAT YOU.

THAT IS NOT THE KIND OF COUNTRY WE SHOULD

BE.

For more infomation >> Republican: Emergency Rooms Shouldn't Treat Everyone - Duration: 6:41.

-------------------------------------------

#Cartabianca - Brunetta commenta Sonny Olumati e lo Ius Soli - Duration: 8:12.

For more infomation >> #Cartabianca - Brunetta commenta Sonny Olumati e lo Ius Soli - Duration: 8:12.

-------------------------------------------

Novos filmes e desenhos na Rede Brasil - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Novos filmes e desenhos na Rede Brasil - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Pantera Negra (Black Panther) trailers 1 e 2 legendados - Duration: 3:59.

pantera negra trailer

black panther

black panther trailer

pantera negra,

pantera negra marvel

pantera negra filme

trailer pantera negra

pantera negra filme completo dublado

pantera negra filme completo dublado

pantera negra trailer marvel

pantera negra online

novo trailer pantera negra

trailers legendados

black panther trailer #1 (2018)

pantera negra trailer legendado

pantera negra trailer dublado

MakeYourChoice

For more infomation >> Pantera Negra (Black Panther) trailers 1 e 2 legendados - Duration: 3:59.

-------------------------------------------

Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w Aur Hazrat Fatima s.a In Hindu Book (Kalki) - Duration: 1:37.

For more infomation >> Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w Aur Hazrat Fatima s.a In Hindu Book (Kalki) - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

Bebê ruim dança na cama, aprende cores inglês com rima por Bebe Vida Real - Duration: 1:52.

For more infomation >> Bebê ruim dança na cama, aprende cores inglês com rima por Bebe Vida Real - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Sandy descarta fantasias sexuais com marido, mas afirma: 'Já usei roupa sexy' - Duration: 6:33.

For more infomation >> Sandy descarta fantasias sexuais com marido, mas afirma: 'Já usei roupa sexy' - Duration: 6:33.

-------------------------------------------

Rompe el silencio el guardia que descubrió al pistolero de las Vegas | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> Rompe el silencio el guardia que descubrió al pistolero de las Vegas | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

How I Make Money Online

For more infomation >> How I Make Money Online

-------------------------------------------

R - Importing Data and Writing Files - Duration: 8:44.

Hello and welcome to another video for programming in R. In this video we will be taking a look at how to read in and write out

data using the read.table and write.table functions.

So let's start by taking a look at the read.table function.

So we can see from the help menu that first we're going to have indicate file. Now file is going to correspond

to the file path, the file name, as well as the .file type.

We're also going to have to see if we have headers or not in our file. By default, set to false, so we can skip this if we notice that

there are no headers in our file. There is also this "sep" option which is for the separator or delimiter.

And we can see by default it is going to be set to a space.

If its something different, then we'll have to change it too would ever type is necessary;

and there some other options as well but we're just going to be focusing on the first three.

So let's now take a look at the file and see if we can get some of this information. Now the

example that I have here is just sitting in my R_is_Awesome folder which is on my desktop.

But let's first take a look at inside this file. Now looking at the file we can see that there doesn't look to be any headers and that each

piece of information here is separated

by a comma. To get our other information let's close the file

and take a look at some of the properties here.

You can see that this is can be a .txt or a text file.

And the location here, the path to this file, is also shown. So I'm just going to copy this, make typing a little easier,

close that out, return over here, and now let's use the function to read in the data. So I'm just going to use a generic dat,

this is what I want to save it as,

to call on read.table,

and then the first piece will be the file. You'll want to make sure that you put this file path in parentheses or single quotes.

every time. And the other thing you'll have to make sure that you do in R especially with a PC is that you have

these slashes turned the other way.

And the reason for that is that R is going to recognize that as an escape character

when it comes to strings; so it's going to be really confused.

So there's the file path, now we also have to indicate the name of the file; 'airports'.

and was a .txt. You have to make sure that you put in the file type as well.

Alright, the next piece; well we can skip the header because by default it was false.

The next piece is gonna be the separator, and remember that it was a comma. You also want to make

sure that you put that into either single or double brackets.

You'll notice that it populated 'dat' into our work environment,

and if we take a look inside it looks like over 8,000 observations. It might seem like that's a lot, but this is really a smaller size

file which this function can handle.

Now if it was a very, very large

type of file you're probably going to want to use a more efficient function from a package, but for this it's sufficient. We can also

view the contents inside and kinda

give it a look over to make sure everything appears to be reading in correctly. It looks like there are some missing bits of information

but that hasn't kind of mixed everything up, so everything looks to be pretty good.

Let's take a look at writing out a dataset.

And go on ahead and copy and

paste that up here into the editor. Let's say that after we read this in we do something

to this

dataset. And then we want to save that result so just to something simple; I'll call it dat.out, and lets say that it's just a subset

of this dataset.

So lets say I wanted all rows

fourth and fifth columns

and lets take a look to see if that looks like that makes sense and everything looks pretty good

So lets say that we want to write this out. So returning over here to help menu

we put in write.table

we'll see that first piece here is "x". So "x" is going to be the object which is going to be written out

the next piece is going to be the same file component. Except now it's going be where do you write it out to, and the

other couple things here we're not going to focus on, but the separator piece is something we will take a look at again. Something else

I want to make mention of here is that whenever you use the read.table that it's going to be writing in

the dataset as a data frame, and we can see this if I return back to data.table

and see that it would read it in and creates a data frame. Okay, so lets call upon

write.table function

and we're gonna write out

dat.out

We use that same file path but we're gonna want to make sure that we change the name, right? Because if we didn't then we'd

just be writing right over top of our original dataset which wouldn't be a very good thing. And lets just call it subset.

Lets also say that the

we don't want to save it as a txt file. Let's say that we're going to save it as a csv, right?

Just another format. If you're going to use a csv file format then, of course, you're going to want the separator to be a comma. So if we go

on ahead and write that out. And we go back to our folder

we'll see that now this new file has been written out. And if we open this up

we're going to see that it doesn't quite look the way that we wanted it to, right? Instead of having just those two columns

it looks like we have these

two headers, but now we have this column of just

numbers here and that's because we forgot to indicate that we did not want

the row names which were just these numbers running down the side of it.

So let's go on ahead and fix that.

And we'll fix that by

taking a look at the options here

and notice that there's this row.names = True by default.

We'll go back in here

and say maybe that's looking a little long, so I'll go down to the next line because R is going to ignore

any spacing as long as you're within the function call. We'll say row.names

equals false.

We're going to see that it comes up with an error.

and that's because I still have the file open,

so close that file.

Then run it, comeback, open it up, and we'll see that now everything

appears to be the way it should be even with the space in here. Now, this isn't the only file type

you can write out as. We could keep that as a txt

and we could for some reason use just a space

that will work as well.

We write this out

we'll see that now there's this other file that's been created, another subset, but it's a different file format so it didn't replace the other

one. If we open up we can see that now it is space separated rather than comma

separated. So that concludes this video on reading in a dataset and writing out a dataset. Hope you found this useful, and happy coding!

For more infomation >> R - Importing Data and Writing Files - Duration: 8:44.

-------------------------------------------

Republican: Emergency Rooms Shouldn't Treat Everyone - Duration: 6:41.

A GOP LAWMAKER THINKS IT'S A BAD IDEA THAT PEOPLE HAVE TO GET

TREATED IF THEY GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

IN FACT, SHE

THINKS THAT WE COULD SAVE DOCTORS IN THIS WHOLE HEALTHCARE

SYSTEM A LOT OF MONEY IF WE DIDN'T HAVE TO TREAT EVERYONE

THE SHUTTLE TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

THIS IS REPRESENTATIVE

DIANE BLACK.

SHE IS IN TENNESSEE AND SHE WAS SPEAKING

TO CHUCK TODD ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND I WANT YOU TO HEAR FROM

HER AND WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY.

TAKE A LOOK THAT.

YOU ARE BEING FORCED INTO FIGURING OUT HOW TO

SUBSIDIZE THAT FREE HEALTHCARE THAT NOBODY PAYS FOR AT THE

EMERGENCY ROOM DOCTOR.

LET ME TELL YOU, CHUCK THAT I AM AN EMERGENCY ROOM NURSE.

THEIR PEOPLE CAME INTO MY EMERGENCY ROOM THAT I, THE NURSE

WAS THE FIRST ONE TO SEE THEM THAT I COULD'VE SENT THEM TO A

WALK-IN CLINIC OR THEIR DOCTOR THE NEXT DAY BUT BECAUSE OF A

LAW THAT CONGRESS PUT INTO PLACE TO SAY NO, I HAVE TO TREAT

EVERYONE THAT WALKS INTO THE EMERGENCY ROOM, YOU TOOK AWAY

OUR ABILITY TO SAY NO.

AN EMERGENCY ROOM IS NOT THE

PROPER PLACE.

AND THEN HE PUT A BURDEN ON TOP OF THAT TO SAY YOU MUST DO THAT.

AND YOU WOULD GET RID OF THE LAW THAT MANDATES EMERGENCY

ROOMS TO SEE EVERY PATIENT THAT SHOWS UP.

I WOULD GET RID OF A LAW THAT SAYS YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED AS

A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL TO MAKE THAT DECISION ABOUT

WHETHER SOMEONE CAN BE APPROPRIATELY TREATED THE

NEXT DAY OR AT A WALK-IN CLINIC OR AT THEIR DOCTOR.

SO I ACTUALLY THINK THAT IF ALL YOU HEARD WAS THAT YOU MIGHT

WALK AWAY THINKING, THAT SEEMS REASONABLE.

THAT IS A PERSON

WHO PRACTICED THIS AS A NURSE AND KNOWS WHAT IT IS AND SHE

SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE HER JUDGMENT AND IF SOMEBODY

CAME IN WITH THE FLU YOU COULD SAY HEY, YOU KNOW WHAT?

COME TO THE CLINIC TOMORROW INSTEAD OF TAKING UP SPACE IN

THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

BUT THAT'S IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF

IT AND AS A CONGRESSWOMAN NOW RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR, SHE SHOULD

KNOW IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER AND THE CONSEQUENCES THAT COULD FLOW

FROM IT.

THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY SIGNED THE LAW INTO THE

EFFECT WAS A WELL-KNOWN LIBERAL NAMED RONALD REAGAN.

IT WAS THE

EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT.

I'M GOING TO

PSYCHOACTIVE LABOR IN THE SECOND BUT THE REASON THEY DID IT IS

BECAUSE BACK IN THE DAY HOSPITALS WOULD DO WITH A CALLED

PATIENT DUMPING.

SOMEONE WALKING TO THE HOSPITAL AND THEY

WOULD GO HE DOESN'T HAVE INSURANCE AND IT IS GOING TO

COST A LOT AND THEY WOULD JUST REFUSE TO TREAT HIM AND THEY

WOULD EITHER JUST DRIVE THEM OUT TO THE STREET AND SAY GOODBYE

AND GOOD LUCK OR THEY WOULD MAKE IT THIS DIFFERENT HOSPITAL TAKE

THEM AND THEY KEPT DOING THIS PATIENT DUMPING TO THE POINT

THAT CONGRESS HAD TO PASS THE LAW AND REAGAN SIGNED INTO

EFFECT.

SO BEFORE YOU GO RUNNING AROUND TALKING ABOUT,

THEY TOOK MY FREEDOM AWAY TO DENY YOU HEALTHCARE.

LOOK INTO

IT A LITTLE BIT AND FIND OUT, NORMALLY I THINK OF THE LAWS

OUTRAGEOUS, THERE MUST'VE BEEN A GOOD REASON FOR THAT MAYBE AT

SOME POINT, LET ME FIND OUT WHY DOTS AND SHE DIDN'T OF COURSE DO

THAT AND ACTIVE LABOR PART IS BECAUSE WOMEN WOULD, IN PREGNANT

IN THE MIDDLE OF LABOR AND HOSPITALS WOULD DUMP THEM ANYWAY

IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE INSURANCE AND SO THAT IS WHY EVEN THE

PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT WAS LIKE THAT IS A FETUS.

THAT IS THE ONE

THING WE CARE ABOUT.

AND YOU ARE SENDING THEM AWAY IN THE MIDDLE OF LABOR?

THAT CAN COST OR MEND HIS PROBLEM SO THAT IS WHERE

THEY PASS THE LAWN THE FIRST PLACE.

THAT IS WHY THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.

YOU ARE GIVING HER THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT IN SAYING

THAT MAYBE SHE DOESN'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF WHY THIS LAW WASN'T

ACTED IN THE FIRST PLACE, BUT I THINK EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY

SOMEONE WHO'S A CURRENT LAWMAKER KNOWS THAT EMERGENCY ROOM'S END

UP SERVING AS A LAST RESORT FOR THE POOR WHO HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE

TO PROVIDE OR PAY FOR HEALTHCARE, WHO HAVEN'T HAD

ACCESS TO HEALTH INSURANCE AND SO THEIR HEALTH CONDITIONS GET

SO BAD THAT THEY END UP IN EMERGENCY ROOMS.

YEAH, THEY

SHOULD BE SEEN BY DOCTORS IF THEY SHOW UP TO THE EMERGENCY

ROOM AND LOOK, MAYBE I AM TOO REAL AND MAYBE I SEE THE DARK

SIDE OF HUMANITY A LITTLE TOO MUCH BUT I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO

BE THE ARBITER OF WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE DESERVES CARE THAT

MOMENT.

SO SHE BRINGS UP SOMEONE WHO HAS A SORE THROAT

FOR A WEEK OR SOMEONE WHOM I HAVE THE FLU BUT I AM NOT BUYING

FOR A SECOND THAT THOSE ARE THE ONLY INDIVIDUALS THAT WOULD BE

TURNED AWAY.

WE ALL KNOW THAT MORE PEOPLE WOULD BE TURNED AWAY

FOR MORE SERIOUS CONDITIONS AND SOMETIMES YOU GO TO THE

EMERGENCY ROOM NOT KNOWING WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU AND MAYBE

THE SYMPTOMS DON'T SEEM THAT SERIOUS TO THE PERSON YOU ARE

DESCRIBING IT TO THAT IT MIGHT END UP BEING SOMETHING

INCREDIBLY SERIOUS.

WHAT IF YOU JUST GOT HIT IN THE HEAD AND YOU ARE WORRIED

THAT YOU'RE GOING TO SUFFER A CONCUSSION?

THESE ARE THINGS YOU SHOULD BE TREATED FOR AND SO WHEN YOU KNOW

THE HISTORY AND WHEN YOU KNOW THAT DEMOGRAPHIC THAT TYPICALLY

ENDS UP IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM, YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THAT LAW

WASN'T ACTED IN THE FIRST PLACE BUT BY THE WAY, ANOTHER THING I

WANTED TO STAY IS THAT IF YOU ARE A HOSPITAL THAT IS NOT

RECEIVING ANY MEDICARE FUNDS, YOU CAN TURN PEOPLE AWAY.

IT IS

TO SIT IF YOU ARE RECEIVING TAXPAYER MONEY, YOU CAN'T DO IT.

YOU CAN'T TURN IT AWAY.

SO IF YOU ARE GENUINELY AGAINST THIS

TYPE OF LAW AND YOU DON'T WANT TO ABIDE BY IT THEN STOP

RECEIVING MEDICARE MONEY AND THEN HE CAN GO AHEAD AND

PATIENT.

AS MUCH AS YOU WANT.

HERE IN LA AND OUR HEALTHCARE

PLAN WE HAVE URGENT CARE AS OPPOSED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

IS FOR LIGHTER STUFF THAT HAPPENS TO YOU AND I LOVE IT

BECAUSE EVERYBODY OF COURSE KNOWS THE LINES IN THE EMERGENCY

ROOM.

IT'S A REAL HASSLE.

WE KNOW THAT THAT IS A REAL ISSUE

SO URGENT CARE HAS COME UP NOW AND THAT'S MUCH BETTER IN THE

SYSTEM.

SO WE'RE NOT SAYING THAT THE LINES IN THE EMERGENCY

ROOM ARE NOT AN ISSUE BUT REMEMBER, IT'S NOT LIKE THE

TREATMENT REQUIRES YOU TO TAKE SEVEN HOURS WITH THE PERSON.

THEY JUST HAVE A SORE THROAT AND THEY SAT THERE WHATEVER THEY HAD

TO SIT THROUGH AND THEY GOT TO YOU SAY OKAY IS A BILL FOR YOUR

THROAT AND WE'RE DONE WITH IT.

IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ARE MANDATED

TO DO ANYTHING ELSE.

IN FACT, IT WOULD PROBABLY TAKE YOU

ALMOST THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME TO DISMISS THAT.

BECAUSE HOW DO

YOU KNOW IF THEY HAVE A SORE THROAT OR THEY DON'T.

WHICH LEADS TO THE STORY OF MINE WHICH IS PRETTY TRAGIC.

REALLY

GOOD FRIEND OF MINE.

FATHER OF HIS WAS IN TURKEY AND EXISTENCE

OF WHAT COULD GO WRONG.

HIS FATHER WAS INVOLVED IN AN

ACCIDENT AND THE DOCTORS LOOKED AT HIM AND THOUGHT HE WAS FINE.

IT TURNS OUT THEY WERE NEGLIGENT.

HE WASN'T FINE.

HE HAD INTERNAL BLEEDING AND HE DIED.

SO THAT IS WHY, WHEN YOU

GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM YES, SOMEONE SHOULD TAKE A COUPLE

MINUTES OUT TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE OKAY AND NOT DUMP YOU ON THE

STREETS AND GO I AM USING MY GOOD JUDGMENT TO MAKE SURE I

DON'T TREAT YOU.

THAT IS NOT THE KIND OF COUNTRY WE SHOULD

BE.

For more infomation >> Republican: Emergency Rooms Shouldn't Treat Everyone - Duration: 6:41.

-------------------------------------------

How I Make Money Online

For more infomation >> How I Make Money Online

-------------------------------------------

Saab 9-5 2.0T - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Saab 9-5 2.0T - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

NFL Owners Announce HUGE New Rule, Eagles Player Furiously Responds - Duration: 19:16.

NFL Owners Announce HUGE New Rule, Eagles Player Furiously Responds

The NFL crisis is overwhelming for every hardcore fan of the most prestigious American football

league in the world.

The divisiveness in the American society could be perfectly described through the prism of

NFL's happenings in the past year and the ignorance of certain very rich and successful

people who still hate the USA from the bottom of their souls.

Anyone who thought an NFL boycott wouldn't do any good is having crow for dinner tonight.

As of today the NFL and their commissioner Roger Goodell plan to get serious about saving

the league from the massive backlash that Americans have dolled out to them.

All this was a result of the absurd disrespect that the players in the league have shown

the national anthem and the flag it represents.

CNBC had to report that they are feeling the squeeze that you and I and every other freedom

loving American put on them with our boycott of their anti-patriotic shenanigans:

"The NFL will discuss in an upcoming meeting the nationwide dispute over whether players

must stand during the National Anthem, Commissioner Roger Goodell said in a copy of a memo obtained

by CNBC.

In the memo sent to NFL teams, Goodell said the league must 'move past this controversy'

and that this has to be done in collaboration with its players."

What would have been great would be if they'd had the patriotism to "move past this controversy"

by stopping it in its tracks the first time it showed up.

However, that's not what pushed them to action; the people of America putting a dent

in their bottom line is what finally pushed them over the edge.

Goodell and his compatriots see their tenure running the league into the ground if they

don't stop this madness.

"'Building on many discussions with clubs and players, we have worked to develop a plan

that we will review with you at next week's League meeting,' Goodell said in a Tuesday

memo.

While he said the plan would include continued dialogue and promoting the work of its players

on key issues, Goodell didn't provide further details on what that proposed plan would entail.

The NFL commissioner said that the league believes everyone should stand for the National

Anthem.

Goodell said the NFL also 'care deeply about our players and respect their opinions and

concerns about critical social issues.'"

Every American should care deeply about whether we have the right to peacefully protest, that

was never the issue at hand.

The issue was that the NFL tried to doup veterans, their families and many others (who would

never willingly spend a dime supporting the Black Lives Matter movement or anything adjacent

to it) into supporting businesses (the teams) who give a national platform to that protest.

And since every team is a business, they're allowed to require their employees to do whatever

they please while on the job.

And if the employees don't like it, they're allowed to quit.

Not all the players want to respect that natural order of things though.

Fox Newsreported one Philadelphia Eagles player who has made it abundantly clear that he never

plans to show respect to the national anthem again, no matter what the league or his team

says:

"Philadelphia Eagles defensive back Malcolm Jenkins said Monday he would defy a rule that

would prohibit him from protesting during the national anthem, even if it meant he would

not play.

'I would still do it,' Jenkins said.

'I mean, I've been that committed to it because that decision is not mine.

I made the decision a year ago that I was going to use my platform in a way to create

positive change both on the field and off the field and having someone tell me I couldn't

do that simply because, you know, a president or your bottom line is getting ready to be

affected, that wouldn't deter me.'"

"'I think we've made that very clear that what we are demonstrating about has nothing

to do with the flag but everything to do with social injustice, racial inequality and the

things that, you know, Jerry Jones and other owners who are making statements have yet

to address,' he said."

Jenkins and all of the other politically correct anti-American players might just get the chance

to see if their teams like them or their bottom line better because the President isn't

pleased with the disrespect and wants to do something about it.

He tweeted on Tuesday that he's considering pushing for a change in tax law that could

take away the NFL tax breaks that total over a billion dollars.

H/T FreedomDaily

God bless America and President Trump!

Every player can be changed with another, every rogue loudmouth can be punished.

Sometimes, it seems like the authorities in this country are so weak, so squishy, so ineffective…

The liberal disease in the American society infected every segment of our everyday lives.

So sad…

SHARE

and COMMENT

For more infomation >> NFL Owners Announce HUGE New Rule, Eagles Player Furiously Responds - Duration: 19:16.

-------------------------------------------

Republican: Emergency Rooms Shouldn't Treat Everyone - Duration: 6:41.

A GOP LAWMAKER THINKS IT'S A BAD IDEA THAT PEOPLE HAVE TO GET

TREATED IF THEY GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

IN FACT, SHE

THINKS THAT WE COULD SAVE DOCTORS IN THIS WHOLE HEALTHCARE

SYSTEM A LOT OF MONEY IF WE DIDN'T HAVE TO TREAT EVERYONE

THE SHUTTLE TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

THIS IS REPRESENTATIVE

DIANE BLACK.

SHE IS IN TENNESSEE AND SHE WAS SPEAKING

TO CHUCK TODD ABOUT THIS ISSUE AND I WANT YOU TO HEAR FROM

HER AND WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY.

TAKE A LOOK THAT.

YOU ARE BEING FORCED INTO FIGURING OUT HOW TO

SUBSIDIZE THAT FREE HEALTHCARE THAT NOBODY PAYS FOR AT THE

EMERGENCY ROOM DOCTOR.

LET ME TELL YOU, CHUCK THAT I AM AN EMERGENCY ROOM NURSE.

THEIR PEOPLE CAME INTO MY EMERGENCY ROOM THAT I, THE NURSE

WAS THE FIRST ONE TO SEE THEM THAT I COULD'VE SENT THEM TO A

WALK-IN CLINIC OR THEIR DOCTOR THE NEXT DAY BUT BECAUSE OF A

LAW THAT CONGRESS PUT INTO PLACE TO SAY NO, I HAVE TO TREAT

EVERYONE THAT WALKS INTO THE EMERGENCY ROOM, YOU TOOK AWAY

OUR ABILITY TO SAY NO.

AN EMERGENCY ROOM IS NOT THE

PROPER PLACE.

AND THEN HE PUT A BURDEN ON TOP OF THAT TO SAY YOU MUST DO THAT.

AND YOU WOULD GET RID OF THE LAW THAT MANDATES EMERGENCY

ROOMS TO SEE EVERY PATIENT THAT SHOWS UP.

I WOULD GET RID OF A LAW THAT SAYS YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED AS

A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL TO MAKE THAT DECISION ABOUT

WHETHER SOMEONE CAN BE APPROPRIATELY TREATED THE

NEXT DAY OR AT A WALK-IN CLINIC OR AT THEIR DOCTOR.

SO I ACTUALLY THINK THAT IF ALL YOU HEARD WAS THAT YOU MIGHT

WALK AWAY THINKING, THAT SEEMS REASONABLE.

THAT IS A PERSON

WHO PRACTICED THIS AS A NURSE AND KNOWS WHAT IT IS AND SHE

SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE HER JUDGMENT AND IF SOMEBODY

CAME IN WITH THE FLU YOU COULD SAY HEY, YOU KNOW WHAT?

COME TO THE CLINIC TOMORROW INSTEAD OF TAKING UP SPACE IN

THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

BUT THAT'S IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF

IT AND AS A CONGRESSWOMAN NOW RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR, SHE SHOULD

KNOW IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER AND THE CONSEQUENCES THAT COULD FLOW

FROM IT.

THE PERSON WHO ACTUALLY SIGNED THE LAW INTO THE

EFFECT WAS A WELL-KNOWN LIBERAL NAMED RONALD REAGAN.

IT WAS THE

EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT.

I'M GOING TO

PSYCHOACTIVE LABOR IN THE SECOND BUT THE REASON THEY DID IT IS

BECAUSE BACK IN THE DAY HOSPITALS WOULD DO WITH A CALLED

PATIENT DUMPING.

SOMEONE WALKING TO THE HOSPITAL AND THEY

WOULD GO HE DOESN'T HAVE INSURANCE AND IT IS GOING TO

COST A LOT AND THEY WOULD JUST REFUSE TO TREAT HIM AND THEY

WOULD EITHER JUST DRIVE THEM OUT TO THE STREET AND SAY GOODBYE

AND GOOD LUCK OR THEY WOULD MAKE IT THIS DIFFERENT HOSPITAL TAKE

THEM AND THEY KEPT DOING THIS PATIENT DUMPING TO THE POINT

THAT CONGRESS HAD TO PASS THE LAW AND REAGAN SIGNED INTO

EFFECT.

SO BEFORE YOU GO RUNNING AROUND TALKING ABOUT,

THEY TOOK MY FREEDOM AWAY TO DENY YOU HEALTHCARE.

LOOK INTO

IT A LITTLE BIT AND FIND OUT, NORMALLY I THINK OF THE LAWS

OUTRAGEOUS, THERE MUST'VE BEEN A GOOD REASON FOR THAT MAYBE AT

SOME POINT, LET ME FIND OUT WHY DOTS AND SHE DIDN'T OF COURSE DO

THAT AND ACTIVE LABOR PART IS BECAUSE WOMEN WOULD, IN PREGNANT

IN THE MIDDLE OF LABOR AND HOSPITALS WOULD DUMP THEM ANYWAY

IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE INSURANCE AND SO THAT IS WHY EVEN THE

PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT WAS LIKE THAT IS A FETUS.

THAT IS THE ONE

THING WE CARE ABOUT.

AND YOU ARE SENDING THEM AWAY IN THE MIDDLE OF LABOR?

THAT CAN COST OR MEND HIS PROBLEM SO THAT IS WHERE

THEY PASS THE LAWN THE FIRST PLACE.

THAT IS WHY THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.

YOU ARE GIVING HER THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT IN SAYING

THAT MAYBE SHE DOESN'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF WHY THIS LAW WASN'T

ACTED IN THE FIRST PLACE, BUT I THINK EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY

SOMEONE WHO'S A CURRENT LAWMAKER KNOWS THAT EMERGENCY ROOM'S END

UP SERVING AS A LAST RESORT FOR THE POOR WHO HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE

TO PROVIDE OR PAY FOR HEALTHCARE, WHO HAVEN'T HAD

ACCESS TO HEALTH INSURANCE AND SO THEIR HEALTH CONDITIONS GET

SO BAD THAT THEY END UP IN EMERGENCY ROOMS.

YEAH, THEY

SHOULD BE SEEN BY DOCTORS IF THEY SHOW UP TO THE EMERGENCY

ROOM AND LOOK, MAYBE I AM TOO REAL AND MAYBE I SEE THE DARK

SIDE OF HUMANITY A LITTLE TOO MUCH BUT I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO

BE THE ARBITER OF WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE DESERVES CARE THAT

MOMENT.

SO SHE BRINGS UP SOMEONE WHO HAS A SORE THROAT

FOR A WEEK OR SOMEONE WHOM I HAVE THE FLU BUT I AM NOT BUYING

FOR A SECOND THAT THOSE ARE THE ONLY INDIVIDUALS THAT WOULD BE

TURNED AWAY.

WE ALL KNOW THAT MORE PEOPLE WOULD BE TURNED AWAY

FOR MORE SERIOUS CONDITIONS AND SOMETIMES YOU GO TO THE

EMERGENCY ROOM NOT KNOWING WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU AND MAYBE

THE SYMPTOMS DON'T SEEM THAT SERIOUS TO THE PERSON YOU ARE

DESCRIBING IT TO THAT IT MIGHT END UP BEING SOMETHING

INCREDIBLY SERIOUS.

WHAT IF YOU JUST GOT HIT IN THE HEAD AND YOU ARE WORRIED

THAT YOU'RE GOING TO SUFFER A CONCUSSION?

THESE ARE THINGS YOU SHOULD BE TREATED FOR AND SO WHEN YOU KNOW

THE HISTORY AND WHEN YOU KNOW THAT DEMOGRAPHIC THAT TYPICALLY

ENDS UP IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM, YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THAT LAW

WASN'T ACTED IN THE FIRST PLACE BUT BY THE WAY, ANOTHER THING I

WANTED TO STAY IS THAT IF YOU ARE A HOSPITAL THAT IS NOT

RECEIVING ANY MEDICARE FUNDS, YOU CAN TURN PEOPLE AWAY.

IT IS

TO SIT IF YOU ARE RECEIVING TAXPAYER MONEY, YOU CAN'T DO IT.

YOU CAN'T TURN IT AWAY.

SO IF YOU ARE GENUINELY AGAINST THIS

TYPE OF LAW AND YOU DON'T WANT TO ABIDE BY IT THEN STOP

RECEIVING MEDICARE MONEY AND THEN HE CAN GO AHEAD AND

PATIENT.

AS MUCH AS YOU WANT.

HERE IN LA AND OUR HEALTHCARE

PLAN WE HAVE URGENT CARE AS OPPOSED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM.

IS FOR LIGHTER STUFF THAT HAPPENS TO YOU AND I LOVE IT

BECAUSE EVERYBODY OF COURSE KNOWS THE LINES IN THE EMERGENCY

ROOM.

IT'S A REAL HASSLE.

WE KNOW THAT THAT IS A REAL ISSUE

SO URGENT CARE HAS COME UP NOW AND THAT'S MUCH BETTER IN THE

SYSTEM.

SO WE'RE NOT SAYING THAT THE LINES IN THE EMERGENCY

ROOM ARE NOT AN ISSUE BUT REMEMBER, IT'S NOT LIKE THE

TREATMENT REQUIRES YOU TO TAKE SEVEN HOURS WITH THE PERSON.

THEY JUST HAVE A SORE THROAT AND THEY SAT THERE WHATEVER THEY HAD

TO SIT THROUGH AND THEY GOT TO YOU SAY OKAY IS A BILL FOR YOUR

THROAT AND WE'RE DONE WITH IT.

IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ARE MANDATED

TO DO ANYTHING ELSE.

IN FACT, IT WOULD PROBABLY TAKE YOU

ALMOST THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME TO DISMISS THAT.

BECAUSE HOW DO

YOU KNOW IF THEY HAVE A SORE THROAT OR THEY DON'T.

WHICH LEADS TO THE STORY OF MINE WHICH IS PRETTY TRAGIC.

REALLY

GOOD FRIEND OF MINE.

FATHER OF HIS WAS IN TURKEY AND EXISTENCE

OF WHAT COULD GO WRONG.

HIS FATHER WAS INVOLVED IN AN

ACCIDENT AND THE DOCTORS LOOKED AT HIM AND THOUGHT HE WAS FINE.

IT TURNS OUT THEY WERE NEGLIGENT.

HE WASN'T FINE.

HE HAD INTERNAL BLEEDING AND HE DIED.

SO THAT IS WHY, WHEN YOU

GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM YES, SOMEONE SHOULD TAKE A COUPLE

MINUTES OUT TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE OKAY AND NOT DUMP YOU ON THE

STREETS AND GO I AM USING MY GOOD JUDGMENT TO MAKE SURE I

DON'T TREAT YOU.

THAT IS NOT THE KIND OF COUNTRY WE SHOULD

BE.

For more infomation >> Republican: Emergency Rooms Shouldn't Treat Everyone - Duration: 6:41.

-------------------------------------------

Blazer - Episode 3 (English Subtitles) - Duration: 4:04.

Previously on Blazer

Voltex Production Present

"Blazer"

Where's Joe?

It's already 3.30pm.

You try call him!

I don't have prepaid.

Sorry. I'm late.

You're always late!

You're always late!

How do I know that you want to meet me?

Nate told me that you fainted.

About what?

It's all about this mask!

This mask makes me fall sick.

Is this a joke?

This is mask.

You must know right?

I know it's a mask!

But you want to make joke is it?

I don't know why?

I fainted.

(Laugh)

You fainted?

You don't believe?

You make me believe first.

You want me to punch?

Go ahead.

(Punch)

Now do you believe it?

I have power!

What's all about?

Up to you if you don't believe me?

Joe!

Joe!

Niko!

Wake up!

Niko!

Eh boi!

Eh boi!

Let Zack knows.

Don't ever dare to come at my port anymore!

If not, I will lash you!

I'm giving you a warning!

Okay.

I can fight them.

Eh boi!

Who are you?

Who am I?

My name is Joe!

You want to fight?

You are just at my finger tips.

Both of you handle!

I want to go home and eat.

"End of Episode 3"

For more infomation >> Blazer - Episode 3 (English Subtitles) - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary Clinton Just Made Unbelievable Announcement Out Of The Blue That NOBODY Saw Coming. - Duration: 4:43.

Hillary Clinton Just Made Unbelievable Announcement Out Of The Blue That NOBODY Saw Coming.

Hillary Clinton was on a promotional tour trying to convince people to buy her book,

"What Happened" and she told BBC Radio 4's 'Woman's Hour' something absolutely

shocking.

This is something that came out of the blue and nobody saw it coming.

Hillary Clinton's unbelievable announcement is sad news to her fans and great news for

anyone who opposes her.

Hillary Clinton announced that she will not run for President in 2020.

If this made you excited, then we're on the same page and we should be friends.

Via RT:

In an announcement that will come as a blow to Hillary fans, the former first lady, secretary

of state and presidential candidate has said she will not run again, though she will continue

to speak out about Donald Trump.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4's 'Woman's Hour' on Tuesday, while on a promotional tour to

sell her new book 'What happened', Clinton revealed that by not running, she's better

placed to "magnify" her voice.

"No, I'm not going to run again," Clinton said.

"I think I'm in a position where my voice will actually be magnified because I am not

running, and there's a very good basis, as we watch Trump's support shrink, that

people will say, 'Well, what she said was right and now where do we go from here?

Her announcement will come as a disappointment to Trump who, before the interview aired,

tweeted that he hoped the two would face off once again.

Clinton thinks she's in a better place to use her voice to speak out against President

Donald Trump if she does not run against him in 2020 (if he runs).

She believes she can fight the powers that be by not competing for the biggest seat in

the White House, and the chance to be the first woman President of the United States

of America.

Of course, she says that now but everyone knows she can change her mind for 2020's

election.

She's probably just saying this now to grab some headlines and talk about her book.

I'm 99.9% certain this is simply a page out of Trump's book to get free press – something

he's a king of.

If Hillary Clinton doesn't run for President in 2020, then perhaps the Democrats will have

learned from the mistakes in 2016 that granted them with some of the worst possible Presidential

options in history.

If Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are the only two people out of the entire Democratic

party who want to be President, then that's a very easy victory for Republicans.

Bernie Sanders, the guy who allegedly owns three homes and hasn't worked a day in his

life, and wants everything to be free in a socialist America would be laughed out of

the election.

Hillary Clinton would lose again because people will enjoy living in America, even more if

the new tax reform is passed and everyone's saving money and enjoying life.

Not to mention people don't actually really like her unless they are hardcore liberals,

who are too close minded to appreciate anything a Republican has to offer.

If Hillary is out of the race for good, then the Democrats might present something more

respectable.

They'll have learned from their mistakes (probably not) and possibly spark some real

competition for Trump or whomever runs in 2020 if Trump is uninterested.

What's bad about Hillary's announcement that she won't run in 2020?

If she's not running against Donald Trump, then Trump might have to put out some effort.

If she ran, then it would be an easy victory for Trump because his voters aren't going

to magically vote for Hillary Clinton.

There's literally no chance of that happening unless there's some more fake Russian collusion

again.

Maybe little Russian men in tin hats sneak into the voter booths and make us vote for

Hillary.

You know, because that's what everyone against Trump thinks happened in 2016.

Though she will not contest the presidency.

Clinton told the show that she will remain active in politics.

"I'm trying to make the case about what we need to do so that what happened in my

election doesn't happen again," she said.

"But I'll also be raising money and support for candidates and causes I believe in.

And I'll be supporting the Democratic Party in the elections this year, next year and

2020.

How will she support the Democrat party?

Selling her book supports herself and doesn't do much for her political party.

Here's what's going to happen in 2020 – Hillary will run for President if she's

not coughing up a storm.

She will go back and forth for the next several years, telling people she is or isn't running

so she can promote her book or other nonsense.

This will all be part of her marketing scheme to cash in on whatever she's selling, then

leading up to her announcement to run for POTUS again.

And, she will lose again,

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> Hillary Clinton Just Made Unbelievable Announcement Out Of The Blue That NOBODY Saw Coming. - Duration: 4:43.

-------------------------------------------

Manchester United's classy act of raising awareness for equality doesn't quite go to plan - Duration: 2:44.

Manchester United's classy act of raising awareness for equality doesn't quite go to plan

MANCHESTER UNITEDS classy act of raising awareness for equality in football didnt exactly go to plan after holding the sign BACKWARDS.

A number of clubs competing in the Champions League posed with an #EqualGameplaque before this weeks fixtures.

But Henrikh Mkhitaryan accidentally held it in reverse during Uniteds team photo ahead of their 1-0 win in Benfica.

#EqualGame is a campaign for equal rights in football across the globe.

It is drive by Uefa stemming from the Respect initiative launched in 2008.

The message No To Racism has derived from Respect for the past four years.

Benfica support the #EqualGame campaign ahead of their defeat to Manchester United.

Chelsea pictured with the #EqualGame sign ahead of their Champions League clash with Roma.

Manchester City and Napoli players hold up the #EqualGame sign before their clash on Tuesday.

Tottenham joined in the Respect campaign by holding up the #EqualGame sign before playing Real Madrid.

In August, Uefa teamed up with some of the worlds biggest stars to launch the demand for respect across all backgrounds in the sport.

Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi and Paul Pogba are among its ambassadors.

A video on EqualGames official website explains: European football is more diverse and multi-cultural than ever.

Our competitions and grassroots projects feature players and fans from all backgrounds.

And for Uefa it is important to communicate that football is for all.

Respect is a social responsibility initiative launched in 2008.

For the last four years, this initiative has featured the message No To Racism.

For more infomation >> Manchester United's classy act of raising awareness for equality doesn't quite go to plan - Duration: 2:44.

-------------------------------------------

We shouldn't be spending $50 bil on the NBN to see services going backwards - Duration: 5:03.

Mr Deputy Speaker, it takes a certain kind of genius, doesn't it, to spend $50 billion

on an infrastructure project which is supposed to improve communications in this country,

only to see speeds go down and prices go up?

This is the stuff that those guys over there say is all going very, very well: $50 billion

to see speeds go down and prices go up.

That's the experience of Australians right around the country.

In fact, from Longman to Logan, from Rankin to Capricornia, right around the country,

people are saying the very same thing: 'Do not let these guys near the NBN.

They have stuffed up everything they've touched.'

The minister was given 10 minutes to explain how they are going to fix this mess.

And what was their killer point?

What was their killer point?

Labor didn't finish the NBN project on the same day that it started it!

We didn't finish it on the same day that we started it.

That's their killer point.

If that is all they've got to defend themselves, Australia is in a world of pain and trouble.

We have got a project that is failing from beginning to end, with connections failing

and bad technology.

The CEO of the NBN has himself conceded that they stuff it up one in 10 times.

One in 10 times, they are stuffing it up.

Can you imagine running a hamburger store where one in 10 customers come back with food

poisoning?

You'd be run out of business pretty quickly.

But they think, and this government thinks, that, if you stuff it up one in 10 times,

things are going all right.

If you want to see the blood drain from government members' faces as quick as anything, just

look at them when the Prime Minister says, 'We've got it; it's all going okay,' because

they know themselves it's not going okay.

They know that there are big problems.

Businesses are losing thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars.

I see the member for Capricornia in the chamber today, and I'm glad she is.

Perhaps she'll have something to say to defend the small businesses in her electorate which

are losing thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars because of the failed NBN project

in Central Queensland.

And it doesn't stop there in Rockhampton and right throughout Central Queensland.

Up and down the coast, small businesses and premises are saying the very same thing.

They need a champion in seats like that who say they are going to do something about the

NBN project, instead of these apologists over there who simply haven't got the answer.

Tomorrow the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is going to release a report, and it is not

going to be good news for you mob over there.

It is not going to be good news for that mob over there, because, in the last report we

saw, there was a 53.6 per cent increase in the complaints about broadband.

I guarantee you the jump tomorrow is going to be even greater than that.

Those members opposite might think that's okay.

But I just want to leave you with one fact: the telecommunications industry receives over

112,000 complaints a year.

That is four times—four times—the number of complaints that the finance and banking

industry receives, and you all know what the feeling out there in the electorate is about

a royal commission into the banking and finance industry.

Why do you think that 'business as usual' is going to be okay?

The mob are coming after you.

You're doing nothing about it, and they're coming after you.

We've got the ideas for reform.

We know what we've got to do.

This mob over here have got to improve the rollout and ensure the Australian people are

getting the best technology available.

We need a tough cop on the beat to ensure that people aren't involved in the NBN ping-pong

that you guys are involved in—apologising and blaming but not taking responsibility

for anything.

We need a tough cop on the beat and we need a set of laws that provide people with the

guarantees and the regulations for a decent broadband service, not the outdated system

that we have in place at the moment.

So I challenge all those members opposite: do the right thing, get behind your own constituencies

and demand a decent broadband service for rural and regional Australia and right around

the country, instead of apologising for the rank failure that your NBN project has been.

We shouldn't be spending $50 billion on this project to see services go backwards.

For more infomation >> We shouldn't be spending $50 bil on the NBN to see services going backwards - Duration: 5:03.

-------------------------------------------

Ep38.0 - FEAR OF CHANGE! - Duration: 3:22.

Fear of change overloads your brain. You know, this is such an important little

piece of wisdom for me to share with you. I spend so much of my life helping

people. I've advised people around money and tax structuring, finances and

business strategy, employing the right teams, culture ,social media building,

video series, attracting the right clients, being authentic, growing their

consciousness. All of these things and you know, one of the most common ways

that you can see this and you'll all understand as I use it. I remember years

ago, and when I say years it was probably only five years ago, my mother (who's you

know in her late 60's at the time or mid 60s at the time) she's afraid of turning

a computer on . And the reason she's can't use it is because she's afraid, she's a

afraid of the change. You know the only thing that's changed in

the last five years, is that she picked up an iPad and she started playing with

it when no one was looking. She started figuring out how to use solitaire. Now,

she has a laptop and she uses a computer for all kinds of things. It wasn't

actually hard for her to learn. Computers haven't really become any simpler to use in

the last five years at all . What changed was her fear of that change, but you

don't have to just let situations bring this about. You can take control of it in

your life. If you're going to do something new, like making video or

putting yourself on social media ,for your career or your business, or you're

going to embark on something brand new, starting a new CRM program, anything. Just

remember that most of the reason why it's hard, is because you've filled your

brain up. When you carry fear of change, it overwhelms everything that is here,

everything that you can use to make this easy. Just relax, chill out, take it like a

game. Take the pressure off yourself. There's

nothing to fear in change, there's nothing to fear in the world. Make it

your own and you'll find that you can navigate everything so much better. It's

the fear that overwhelms you, give your self the space that you need. If your

brain is caught up arguing with itself, if it is fighting with itself,

everything is going to be hard not just the change. Thanks, let me know what you

think. I'd love to hear your comments and as always please make sure you subscribe

and like and I'll talk to you soon. Cheers.

For more infomation >> Ep38.0 - FEAR OF CHANGE! - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

Eminem Receives BAD NEWS After Publicly Trashing Trump - Duration: 19:16.

Eminem Receives BAD NEWS After Publicly Trashing Trump

The HUGE confrontation between Marshall Matters Eminem and President Donald Trump reached

the zenith recently after the famous rap legend decided to make a freestyle rap to 'diss'

President Trump using serious insults and accusations.

However, this is another bad news for him and for the leftists because they actually

made Trump a great favor.

Read more below:

It didn't take long for the rapper to get his wake-up call of reality after hopping

on the wrong train.

With the failure of the NFL and Kaepernick's career, Eminem should have seen that the country

is ready to something new, not more of the same rhetoric.

Now, Trump is getting the last laugh just 12 hours after being trashed.

"Eminem's unhinged cringeworthy attack on President Trump at the BET awards only

helped to strengthen Trump's re-election campaign," Red State Watcherreported.

As soon as the video came out of his performance, Twitter was ablazewith irritated people on

both sides of the aisle wondering why these self-entitled entertainers can't just do

their jobs and leave the president out of their performance.

Eminem's freestyle rap suggests that perhaps he's obsessed with Trump and the power he

has over him and is disguising it as a fake outrage to his career advantage.

"The washed-up aging rap star unveiled his disgusting song during Tuesday's BET Hip-Hop

Awards," Prissy Holly reported about the performance.

"The lyrics declare a literal war on Americans who dislike Kaepernick, and the new NFL unofficial

anthem says 'F YOU' to anyone who supports President Trump."

"This is for Colin (Kaepernick), ball up a fist

And keep that (expletive) balled like Donald the (expletive)…

Any fan of mine who's a supporter of his (Trump)

I'm drawing in the sand a line

You either for or against…

The rest of America, stand up."

While he's rapping and spitting his hate, Trump is winning and laughing all the way

into 2020 reelection.

The hateful people in Hollywood can keep up their rants and protests because Trump will

keep doing what he does and that's winning.

These petulant children are throwing nothing more than a tempter-tantrum to the public

and it's serving as an awesome contrast to all of Trump's achievements for America

in just the first nine months of his administration.

It's ironic that the blunt Eminem pushed in his rap that the "lines have been drawn

in the sand," is actually reality, but not in the way of what the rapper thought he was

saying.

Liberal entertainers in a variety of venues have drawn the line between themselves and

the rest of the country who wants to be entertained, not politically preached to by these people.

Rappers and racist athletes didn't draw the line, citizens did by not paying to participate

in their rhetoric.

NFL coaches also did who refused to hire race hustlers like Kaepernick and moviegoers who

picked different flicks that didn't push a divisive message.

All these things led to a major financial demise in these parts of the entertainment

industry.

H/T FreedomDaily

There's nothing they can do to make the nation hate Trump.

This story is just another solid proof that the liberal propaganda and their UNDERESTIMATING

of the American people always backfires.

It backfired this time again.

Eminem is facing a huge boycott- he shouldn't have done something this much stupid.

Don't you agree?

SHARE and COMMENT

For more infomation >> Eminem Receives BAD NEWS After Publicly Trashing Trump - Duration: 19:16.

-------------------------------------------

Olympian McKayla Maroney Molested By Team Doctor - Duration: 6:26.

MORE AND MORE WOMEN ARE SHARING THEIR STORIES OF SEXUAL

ASSAULT OR SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND A LOT OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS

INCLUDE PUBLIC FIGURES.

PEOPLE IN THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY

AND NOW WERE ALSO HEARING FROM OLYMPIANS.

OLYMPIC GYMNIST

MCKAYLA MARONEY SHARED HER STORY OF BEING SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY

AN OLYMPIC DOCTOR AND THIS DOCTOR IS ACTUALLY CURRENTLY IN

PRISON.

HE'S ACTUALLY IN JAIL.

HE'S THE PERSON THAT BERNIE IS

ACCUSING OF ASSAULTING HER FOR YEARS, SINCE SHE WAS 13 YEARS

OLD.

SHE USED THEM ME TO SHARE HER STORY ON TWITTER AND HERE IS

A PORTION OF HER STATEMENT.

SHE SAID:

AGAIN, IT STARTED WHEN SHE

WAS 13 YEARS OLD.

TO GIVE YOU FURTHER CONTEXT, THERE HAVE BEEN ANOTHER OF WHAT

NUMBER OF WOMEN WHO HAVE COME FORWARD ACCUSING HIM OF SEXUAL

ASSAULT.

THEY WOULD SAY THAT DURING THESE PHYSICAL EXAMS, HE

WOULD PLACE HIS FINGERS INSIDE THEM AND FONDLE THEM IN WAYS

THAT WERE OBVIOUSLY INAPPROPRIATE AND SO HE IS

PLEADING NOT GUILTY TO THOSE CHARGES BUT WHEN IT COMES TO

CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, HE HAS AGREED TO PLEAD GUILTY.

ONE OF THE INTERESTING THINGS ABOUT THIS STORY IS THAT HE HAS

HUNDREDS OF LAWSUITS AGAINST HIM SO THIS GUY IS A SERIAL ABUSER

AND LIKE ANNA SAID, HE HAS ARTIE PLED GUILTY AT LEAST TO THE

CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES SO WE KIND OF SUPER THIS IS GOING AND

I DON'T THINK HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE ARE MAKING IT UP AND MANY OF

MARONEY'S TEAMMATES HAD ALREADY ACCUSED HIM OF ABUSE WHILE THEY

WERE MINORS BUT EVEN SO, IT TOOK ALL OF THE OTHER WOMEN COMING

FORWARD BEFORE MARONEY.

YOU KNOW WHAT?

THERE'S NO REASON TO HIDE IT.

THERE'S NO REASON TO FEEL BAD

ABOUT IT.

HE SHOULD GO BAD ABOUT IT AND NOW SHE IS FINALLY

COMING FORWARD TO DOTS SHE IS A GOLD-MEDAL WINNER AND SO IS A

LITTLE BIT BIGGER SPOTLIGHT BUT JUST TO SEE THIS HAPPENING IN

REAL TIME, AS WOMEN ARE GROWING BOLDER AND GETTING ENCOURAGED BY

EACH OTHER TO STEP OUT AND FIGHT BACK, I DON'T WANT YOU TO

UNDERESTIMATE WHAT AN AMAZING TIME THIS IS DOTS IT'S REALLY,

IT'S HAPPENING RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES AS THE CULTURE IS

SHIFTING BECAUSE IT'S APPARENTLY AND AS WE SEE ONE STORY AFTER

ANOTHER, AMAZING WHAT MENUS TO GET AWAY WITH AND WE NEVER

TALKED ABOUT IT.

THE LIST GOES ON AND ON.

IT WAS ALL BARRY.

YOU WOULD SEE LITTLE STORIES HERE THERE BUT WE HAD NO IDEA

HOW ENDEMIC IT WAS AND MAYBE WOMEN KNEW IT BETTER THAN MEN

DID BUT TO SEE UNFOLDING IN REAL TIME AS WOMEN KIND OF STAND UP

TOGETHER COLLECTIVELY AGO NO MORE, IT'S A WONDERFUL TO SEE

DOCTOR CITIZEN WAS ALSO INCREDIBLE AND DEPRESSING AT THE

SAME TIME IS BECAUSE OF THIS ME TO CAMPAIGN, THERE HAVE BEEN SO

MANY WOMEN THAT I KNOW PERSONALLY SPEAKING UP AND

SHARING STORIES THAT I DIDN'T PREVIOUSLY KNOW ABOUT AND IT IS

JUST HEARTBREAKING TO KNOW THE NUMBER OF WOMEN THAT WE ALL KNOW

THAT HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS AND I HAVE BEEN THINKING ABOUT THE

ME TO CAMPAIGN A LOT BECAUSE THERE ARE WOMEN WHO SHARE SOME

OF THE MOST HEINOUS STORIES LIKE WHAT MARONEY IS TALKING ABOUT,

BEING FONDLED, SEXUALLY ASSAULTED LIKE THAT AND SO WHEN

I THINK ABOUT THINGS THAT I HAVE GONE THROUGH, I FEEL LIKE

IT'S NOT APPROPRIATE FOR ME TO SHARE THE STORIES THAT I'VE

EXPERIENCED, RIGHT?

I HAVE SHARED THE STORY OF THE GUY WHO WAS RIDING HIS BIKE AND

HE WENT AROUND, HE SLAPPED MY BUTT AND THEN RODE AWAY LAUGHING

AND THEN HE CAME AROUND AGAIN TO DO IT AGAIN AND THEN THAT WAS

WHEN I DEFENDED MYSELF AND I KICKED THEM OFF THE BIKE AND SO

I THOUGHT THAT WAS THE ONLY TIME THAT I HAD EVER EXPERIENCED

ANYTHING LIKE THAT AND THEN I REMEMBERED SOMETHING ELSE THAT

I'VE NEVER TALKED ABOUT AND I NEVER FELT SHAME BECAUSE IT

HAPPENS.

YOU HEAR WOMEN TALK ABOUT, I FELT SHAME WHEN IT

HAPPENED BUT I ACTUALLY FEEL SHAME NOW BECAUSE WHEN IT

HAPPENED, I JUST THOUGHT OF IT AS, THAT IS JUST THE WAY THINGS

GOING TO HAVE TO ACCEPT IT AND I FEEL EMBARRASSED BY THAT.

I'M

NOT NAMING ANY NAMES BUT I REMEMBER TALKING TO YOU ABOUT IT

SO YOU WILL REMEMBER IT DOTS YOU AND I WENT TO A PARTY FOR A

PRETTY BIG YOUTUBE OR.

I REMEMBER NOW.

AND THERE WERE A NUMBER OF BIG YOUTUBE OR IS THERE, ONE

WHICH I WAS A FAN OF AND WE TOOK A PICTURE TOGETHER AND AS WE

WERE TAKING THAT PICTURE, HE THOUGHT IT WAS, BY THE WAY, MY

POOR BOYFRIEND AT THE TIME WAS TAKING THE PHOTO OF A STUDY THAT

IT WAS COMPLETELY APPROPRIATE TO GRAB MY BUTT AS A STORY WAS THAT

PICTURE IS BEING TAKEN.

AND SO IT'S WEIRD BECAUSE OF THE TIME I

DIDN'T LIKE IT BUT I JUST KIND OF PUT IN THE BACK OF MY HEAD AS

THIS IS JUST THE WAY THINGS GO.

THIS IS HOW PEOPLE TREAT YOU

SOMETIMES.

THERE'S NOTHING I CAN DO ABOUT IT. AND THAT KIND

OF STUFF HAPPENS ALL THE TIME AND I ACTUALLY FIND MYSELF LUCKY

THAT I HAVEN'T HAD TO GO THROUGH SOME OF THE EXTREME SITUATIONS

THE OTHER WOMEN HAVE HAD TO GO THROUGH BUT EVERY WOMAN HAS GONE

THROUGH SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

YOU KNOW?

YEAH.

MAYBE WITH THIS MOVEMENT IT IS GOING TO GET A

LOT HARDER BECAUSE IF YOU ARE A GUY AND YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT

SEXUALLY HARASSING A WOMAN OR ASSAULTING THEM, ARE YOU SURE IS

NOT GOING TO BE PUT ON SOCIAL MEDIA IMMEDIATELY?

YOU BETTER

THINK TWICE AND IF YOU THINK THAT THAT IS A BAD THING, I

HAVE A BAD NEWS FOR YOU.

YOU MAY BE THE BAD GUY.

I THINK IT'S A GREAT THING THAT WOMEN ARE FIGHTING BACK.

For more infomation >> Olympian McKayla Maroney Molested By Team Doctor - Duration: 6:26.

-------------------------------------------

Poll: Scary Amount Of Americans Believe Media Is Lying - Duration: 13:38.

DONALD TRUMP LOVES TO TALK ABOUT

FAKE NEWS.

ANYTIME ANYONE IN THE MEDIA RIGHT SOMETHING THAT

APPEARS TO BE CRITICAL, TRUMP JUST BRUSHES IT OFF AS FALSE

REPORTING AND FAKE.

HOWEVER, IT TURNS OUT THE HIM REPEATEDLY

SAYING THAT IS KIND OF WORKING AND SOME AMERICANS DO BELIEVE

THAT THE MEDIA IS FABRICATING STORIES ABOUT TRUMP AND HIS

ADMINISTRATION SO POLITICAL AND MORNING CONSOLE TO THE POLL ON

THIS AND HERE'S WHAT THEY FOUND.

IF YOU LOOK AT ALL VOTERS, YOU

TAKE A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE AND LOOK AT ALL VOTERS, IT TURNS OUT

THAT 46% OF VOTERS SAY YES, THE MEDIA IS MAKING UP STORIES ABOUT

TRUMP.

37% SAY NO AND 17% SAY UNDECIDED.

THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THEY ARE NOT SAYING THAT THE

MEDIA IS BIASED AND SLANTING THE STORIES OR GIVING THEIR OPINION

ON THE STORIES, THEY ARE SAYING THAT THE NEWS MEDIA IS

FABRICATING THE STORIES.

JUST MAKING IT UP.

SO IN FACT,

DONALD TRUMP DID HAVE A RECORD-BREAKING SIZE AT HIS

INAUGURATION BUT THE NEWS MEDIA GOT TOGETHER AND DECIDED TO

FABRICATE THAT THE CROWDS WERE NOT THAT BIG AND THEY FABRICATED

THE PICTURES.

I'M IN, I'M JUST GIVING YOU ONE EXAMPLE TO.

ARE WE FABRICATING HIS TWEETS, TOO?

ARE WE FABRICATING

THINGS THAT HE SAYS ON TELEVISION HIMSELF?

ANYWAY.

OKAY.

IT IS JUST ABSURD BECAUSE EVEN IF WE DID ABSOLUTELY NO

REPORTING WHATSOEVER, HE SAYS THINGS HIMSELF THAT HE TWEETS,

HE CAN'T STOP HIMSELF FROM TWEETING.

HE ATTACKS PEOPLE AND

GETS INVOLVED IN THESE RIDICULOUS NONISSUES IN THESE

FIGHTS.

ANYWAY, LET'S FOCUS ON REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS,

INDEPENDENTS, WHAT DO THEY THINK, WHEN YOU DIVVY UP THE

VOTERS AND LOOK AT THEIR IDEOLOGICAL BACKGROUNDS,

WHAT THEY THINK IN REGARD TO NEWS COVERAGE ON TRUMP?

WHEN IT COMES TO REPUBLICANS, COURSE THE VAST MAJORITY THINK

THAT THE MEDIA SEGREGATING STORIES ABOUT THEM.

76% OF

REPUBLICAN VOTERS SAY YES, THERE ARE FABRICATIONS IN THE MEDIA ON

TRUMP.

11% SAY NO.

LET'S PAUSE THERE FOR ONE 2ND.

YOU CAN SAY OKAY, COURSE

REPUBLICANS BELIEVE THAT MORE BUT LET'S PAUSE TO NOTE THAT

THREE QUARTERS OF REPUBLICANS IN THIS COUNTRY HAVE LOST THEIR

MINDS SO IF YOU SAY THE CORPORATE MEDIA IS BIASED, I'M

GOING TO AGREE WITH YOU GUYS.

I'M NOT TRYING TO DEFEND THEIR

BIAS AND I'VE SAID THIS 1 MILLION TIMES.

I THINK THEY

HAVE AN ESTABLISHMENT BIASED.

THE STATUS QUO IS GREAT THAT

THEY WORK FOR A MULTI- MILLION DOLLAR CORPORATION TOP I'VE ALSO

WORKED THERE AND I KNOW A LOT OF THE SPOKES I KNOW HOW THE SYSTEM

WORKS.

THEY DON'T JUST IN A ROOM AND GO WHAT COULD WE MAKE UP ABOUT

ANYONE?

WHETHER IT'S DONALD TRUMP OR BERNIE SANDERS WHO I REALLY

LIKE.

NO, THEY ARE SLANTED.

THEY THINK BERNIE SANDERS

SHOULDN'T BE PRESIDENT.

THEY WILL TAKE SOMETHING HE SAID AND

TWIST HIS WORDS A LITTLE BIT I UNDERSTAND THAT.

I FEEL YOUR

PAIN IF YOU THINK THEY ARE BIASED.

WEATHER WERE ON THE

SAME SIDE OR NOT.

BUT THEY DON'T GO IN A ROOM AGO LET'S

JUST MAKE UP A STORY ABOUT BERNIE SANDERS.

LET'S JUST

IMAGINE IT.

DON'T WORRY, OUR EDITORS WON'T FIRE US FOR

FABRICATING A STORY.

THEY DON'T DO IT ABOUT TRUMP AND THREE

QUARTERS OF REPUBLICANS IN THIS COUNTRY BELIEVE SOMETHING THAT

ISN'T REMOTELY TRUE.

WE'VE LOST THEM.

THEY DO NOT LIVE IN THIS

REALITY.

THEY LIVE IN AN ALTERNATE REALITY.

SO THE NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT WHEN IT COMES TO DEMOCRATS.

ONLY 20% OF DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THAT THE MEDIA IS FABRICATING

STORIES ABOUT TRUMP AND THE ADMINISTRATION.

65% SAY NO.

I, REAL QUICK.

20% OF DEMOCRATS THINK THE MEDIA IS

INVENTING STORIES, FABRICATING STORIES ABOUT TRUMP.

O MY GOD,

THE MEDIA HAS LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

IT'S ABOUT TO GET A LOT WORSE AND ALSO, IT'S SOMETHING THAT I

THINK EVERYONE, REGARDLESS OF YOUR IDEOLOGY SHOULD BE

CONCERNED ABOUT BECAUSE THIS IS THE ROADMAP TO A TYRANNICAL

GOVERNMENT AND THE REASON WHY I SAY THAT IS BECAUSE THE MEDIA IS

SO IMPORTANT IN HOLDING ELECTED OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE WHETHER

THEY ARE ON THE RIGHT OR THE LEFT, IT DOES NOT MATTER.

JOURNALISM IS IMPORTANT AND IF YOU HAVE AN AMERICAN ELECTORATE

THAT IS DISTRUSTFUL OF THE MEDIA AND DOESN'T SEE THE VALUE OF

JOURNALISM, YOU ARE ESSENTIALLY PAVING THE WAY FOR SOMEONE LIKE

TRUMP TO DO SOME PRETTY TERRIBLE THINGS.

VERY QUICKLY, WHEN IT

COMES TO INDEPENDENTS.

44% BELIEVE THE MEDIA IS MAKING UP

STORIES ABOUT TRUMP.

WE HAVE LOST INDEPENDENTS.

INDEPENDENTS

ARE ACTUALLY REAL.

BEFORE THEY WERE JUST, TO SOME DEGREE

REPUBLICAN LEANING FOR A LONG TIME.

INDEPENDENTS ARE NOW TRUE

INDEPENDENTS AND THEY DO DECIDE ELECTIONS.

I HAVE SEEN THAT

HAPPEN RIGHT FRONT OF MY EYES OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST

DECADE OR SO PARTLY BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE NO LONGER ATTACHED TO

PARTY LABELS LIKE THEY WERE IN EARLIER TIMES AND IF YOU'VE LOST

INDEPENDENTS, THAT IS REALLY BAD NEWS FOR THE MAJORITY OF

INDEPENDENTS OR AT LEAST THE PLURALITY OF INDEPENDENTS TO SAY

YES, NEWS MEDIA ARE JUST LIARS WHO MAKE UP STORIES ABOUT TRUMP,

THAT IS REALLY BAD NEWS.

WE DID NOT INVENT THAT.

JUST TO GIVE YOU MORE BAD NEWS AND WHAT I WOULD ARGUE IS

THE SCARIEST PART OF ALL OF THIS, THERE ARE AMERICANS WHO

BELIEVE THAT THE GOVERNMENT, TRUMP SPECIFICALLY, SHOULD HAVE

THE ABILITY TO TAKE LICENSES AWAY FROM NEWS ORGANIZATIONS.

IF YOU COULD RECALL, RECENTLY TRUMP CRITICIZE NBC NEWS AND

SAID THAT NBC NEWS SHOULD HAVE ITS LICENSE REVOKED AND

APPARENTLY, THERE ARE AMERICANS WHO THINK THAT THE PRESIDENT

SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO DO THAT.

IT'S A SMALL PORTION OF

THE COUNTRY OVERALL, BUT IT STILL CONCERNS ME.

SO

HERE ARE SPECIFIC NUMBERS THAT ARE TIED TO PARTIES.

WHAT IS GOING ON?

THERE ARE DEMOCRATS THAT THINK IT IS OKAY FOR THE

GOVERNMENT TO REVOKE LICENSES FROM NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

THAT IT DOESN'T LIKE THAT YOU ARE GOING TO ALLOW THEM TO

BE THE ARBITER OF WHAT IS AND IS NOT FABRICATED NEWS AND

HAVE THE POWER TO REVOKE THEIR LICENSES?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

THAT IS INSANE.

THAT IS SO INCREDIBLY DEVASTATING.

DEMOCRATS.

OKAY.

WE'VE COMPLETELY LOST IT SO LET'S GO

ON TO REPUBLICANS.

A THIRD OF GOP VOTERS SAY NO YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE THE POWER TO

DO THAT BEFORE TO 6% OF REPUBLICANS BELIEVE YES,

DEFINITELY.

THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO REVOKE

LICENSES FROM NEWS ORGANIZATIONS THAT IT DOES NOT LIKE.

IF YOU ARE IN THE CAMP THAT BELIEVES THAT, YOU ARE AN

AMERICAN.

UR.

IT IS ONE OF THE MOST CENTRAL PARTS OF OUR

GOVERNMENT, THE FIRST AMENDMENT GUARANTEES THE FREEDOM OF THE

PRESS.

IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, PERSONAL, IF YOU DON'T ENGLISH

AND APPLY THE FIRST AMENDMENT I ASSUME THAT YOU WILL ALSO AGREE

THAT WE SHOULD NOT APPLY THE SECOND AMENDMENT.

OH WAY, YOU LIKE TO PICK AND CHOOSE AMONG AMENDMENTS?

I THOUGHT YOU WERE CONSTITUTIONALISTS.

YOU DON'T LOVE THE CONSTITUTION, YOU DON'T LOVE THE COUNTRY

OR SYSTEM.

YOU GUYS ARE THROWING FECES AT ONE ANOTHER OVER BEN SHAPIRO

GIVING A SPEECH AT BERKELEY BECAUSE ALL MY GOD, THIS IS A

VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS IF THEY DON'T ALLOW

HIM TO SPEAK WHICH BY THE WAY, AGAIN, FOR THE BILLIONTH TIME, I

AGREE WITH THAT.

HE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK.

AND COULTER

SHOULD BE ABLE TO SPEAK.

WHATEVER DEPLORABLE INDIVIDUAL

YOU WANT ON THE CAMPUS SHOULD BE ABLE TO SPEAK BUT AT THE SAME

TIME YOU WERE GOING TO RUN AND SAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD

BE ABLE TO REVOKE LICENSES FROM MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS THAT IT DOES

NOT LIE?

WOW.

THAT IS DEEPLY DISTURBING FOR WHAT AMERICANS THINK, HOW DONALD

TRUMP HAS DRIVEN THAT NARRATIVE AND UNFORTUNATELY, IT IS WORKED

OUT HE RECENTLY DID A TWEAK, IS A FAKE NEWS 1 MILLION TIMES AND

HE ACCUSED CNN AND EVERYONE ELSE OF BEING FICTION WRITERS.

HE

JUST TWEETED THAT THE OTHER DAY BUT THERE IS ONE OTHER FACTOR

HERE AND ONE OTHER PARTY THAT'S RESPONSIBLE AND THAT IS THE

MAINSTREAM MEDIA.

THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS THAT I DISAGREE

WITH THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ON.

I'VE DONE STORIES ABOUT

1000 MORNING JOE MISTAKES AND THE WAY THAT THEY FRAME IT, THEY

ARE PREPOSTEROUS.

THEY TALK ABOUT WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

THINK THEY DON'T BACK IT UP WITH PULLING.

AND ONE ON CHUCK TODD,

ETC.

DO I THINK THAT NBC'S LICENSE SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY?

ARE YOU INSANE?

NO, I ALSO CAN SPEAK AND I CAN SHOW YOU THEIR

CLIP AND THEN I CAN SHOW YOU ARE CLIP.

I CAN SEE DATA TO PROVE

US RIGHT.

THAT IS CALLED THE MORE SPEECH.

AND BY THE WAY,

YOUR LOGIC IS THE SAME EXACT THING THAT YOUR LOVE TO DO IT ON

YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, ANYWHERE YOU LIKE AND YOU CAN EVEN MAKE STUFF

UP AND YOU OFTEN DO ON THE RIGHT WING.

OVER AND OVER AND OVER

AGAIN AN INTERN RUNNING GO, CAN YOU BELIEVE PEOPLE ARE

MAKING STUFF UP?

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

LOOK AT THE RIGHT WING BLOGS.

HALF OF THE STUFF ON THERE IS

MADE UP AND WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT ENDING THEIR FREEDOM OF

SPEECH EVEN THOUGH THEY CONSISTENTLY ACTUALLY LIFE.

BY THE WAY, YOU KNOW THAT JOURNALISTS CAN GET SUED AT

ANY TIME FOR DEFAMATION?

LIKE WE HAVE LAWS THAT PREVENT PEOPLE FROM FLAT OUT LYING ABOUT

PEOPLE WHETHER IT IS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL OR PRIVATE CITIZEN.

IF

YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY OF DEFAMATION LAWS, YOU WERE GOING

TO FACE SOME SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES FOR THAT.

NO ONE

IS ALLOWED TO JUST FABRICATE STORIES ABOUT ANYONE.

OKAY, THERE ARE ALREADY WAS PREVENTING THAT FROM HAPPENING.

2 JOURNALISTS SOMETIMES GET FACTS WRONG'S?

ABSOLUTELY, THEIR HUMANS AND SHOULD THEY GET CRITICIZED

BUT I?

YES.

BUT TO SAY THEY ARE MAKING UP STORIES ABOUT THE PRESIDENT

IS ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS AND QUITE HONESTLY, IT MAKES ME

FEEL LIKE WE'RE JUST WASTING OUR TIME.

LIKE WHAT ARE WE DOING?

WE ARE WASTING OUR TIME.

THEY DON'T WANT TO BELIEVE IT BECAUSE IT GOES AGAINST

ONCE THEY ALREADY BELIEVE.

THEIR PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS.

KNOW, WE HAVE TO WIN INDEPENDENTS AND THAT IS WHY AM

SO MAD AT THE ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO

ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR BIAS AND THEREBY, HEARD THE REST OF THE

MEDIA BECAUSE THEY KEEP SAYING, WE ARE NEUTRAL.

WEíRE

OBJECTIVE, WE HAVE NO BIAS AT ALL.

A LOT OF THE WRITERS ARE

AMAZING.

I CAN GO ON AND ON.

FOR CABLE NEWS GUYS, AND FOR A

LOT OF THE BROADCAST NEWS GUYS, THEY FAVOR THE STATUS QUO.

THEY

DO BUT THEY DON'T RECOGNIZE IT.

THEY THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS

WONDERFUL AND WE SHOULDN'T HAVE TOO MUCH CHANGE.

EVERYONE ON

THE LEFT IS A RADICAL, EVERYONE ON THE RIGHT IS A RADICAL AND

THEY SAY AND POUND THE MESSAGE HOME.

I DON'T CARE, I'M NOT

GOING TO SHUT THEM DOWN FOR IT I DISAGREE WITH THEM.

THAT IS

OKAY BUT WHEN THEY SAY THAT THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON THE TRUTH AND

THE TRUTH IS THAT THE STATUS QUO IS GREAT, WITH THE REST OF THE

COUNTRY HERE'S A SCREW YOU.

YOU ARE NOT ON MY SIDE.

AND WHEN I

SAY THAT TO THE ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA THEY GET REALLY ANGRY BUT

KNUCKLEHEADS, UNLIKE THESE GUYS, WE'RE NOT TRYING TO TEAR YOU

DOWN.

WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE IT BETTER SO THAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY

TRUST YOU AGAIN.

BUT IF YOU KEEP TELLING EVERYBODY THAT

ANYBODY WANTS CHANGES A RADICAL AND PEOPLE LIKE HILLARY CLINTON

AND BY THE WAY, MIKE PENCE AND ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS AND

ESTABLISHMENT DEMOCRATS ARE AWESOME IN THEIR HONORABLE

GENTLEMEN AND WE SHOULD GO BACK TO THE MIDDLE AND KEEP DOING

WHAT THEIR DONORS SAY, WHEN YOU DO RIDICULOUS THINGS LIKE

PRETEND THAT MONEY AND POLITICS DOESN'T MATTER, NO, THESE ARE

HONORABLE GENTLEMEN HAVING A DEBATE IN CONGRESS.

THEY'RE NOT

HAVING A DEBATE THAT THEY TOOK THE CHECK AND THEN THEY DID WITH

THEIR DONORS TOLD THEM TO DO THAT WHEN YOU PRETEND THINGS

LIKE THAT, YOU LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY AND UNFORTUNATELY,

WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS HELPING THE OTHER SIDE ATTACK THE CORE

PRINCIPLES OF AMERICA AND HELPING THEM DESTROY THE FREEDOM

OF THE PRESS.

YOU ARE NOT HELPING, YOU ARE HURTING THAT

WE'RE TRYING TO FIX IT, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT WE ARE EVER

GOING TO GET THROUGH TO THE ESTABLISHMENT PRESS OR THE RIGHT

WING ARE NOW EVEN SOME DEMOCRATS WHO THINK, NO, THEY JUST GET IN

A ROOM, HAVE FANTASY TIME, MAKE UP RANDOM STORIES AND THEN

PRINT THEM OR PUT THEM ON TV.

THIS IS INCREDIBLY EMBARRASSING AND DEPRESSING.

AND BY THE WAY, THE MATTER WHAT YOU GUYS ARE SAYING, AND

HONESTLY, WHAT WERE SAYING, TRUMP IS A 44%.

FOR MOST

PRESIDENTS THAT'S A REALLY BAD NUMBER BUT FOR HIM, HE IS

CLIMBING.

HE WAS IN THE MID-30S.

HE IS GOING UP TO 44%.

MAN, THEY ARE JUST, FOLKS IN AMERICA ARE NOT LISTENING TO THE

MEDIA.

THE MEDIA HAS BEEN OVERWHELMINGLY NEGATIVE TO TRUMP

AND PEOPLE ARE GOING I DON'T CARE, I LIKE THEM ANYWAY.

ALL RIGHT WILL ENJOY HIS ABOUT TO DUTY LIFE AND WHAT

HE HAS BEEN DOING TO LIKE TO BE QUITE HONEST I ENJOY IT.

HAPPEN.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE WILL BE PROVEN RIGHT AGAIN ABOUT

TRUMPET IT WON'T BE PRETTY IN THE MEANWHILE.

For more infomation >> Poll: Scary Amount Of Americans Believe Media Is Lying - Duration: 13:38.

-------------------------------------------

Amazon Executive: "You Will Love My D*ck" - Duration: 4:26.

ROY PRICE IS NOW THE FORMER CEO OF AMAZON STUDIOS

FOLLOWING ACCUSATIONS THAT HE SEXUALLY HARASSED A PRODUCER FOR

ONE OF THE SERIES ON AMAZON.

ISA HACKETT SPOKE TO THE

HOLLYWOOD REPORTER RECENTLY, AND TOLD THEM ABOUT HER EXPERIENCE

GETTING SEXUALLY HARASSED BY ROY PRICE AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE

ACCUSATIONS AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE REPORT CAME OUT,

AMAZON STUDIOS SUSPENDED ROY PRICE AND HE HAS SINCE RESIGNED

FROM THE POSITION.

NOT JUST TO GIVE YOU

A REFRESHER:

HE ALLEGEDLY TOLD HER:

TWO PEOPLE CORROBORATED THAT ACCOUNT TO THE HOLLYWOOD

REPORTER.

SO HE HAS RESIGNED, HE STEPPED DOWN.

I HAVEN'T SEEN AT

STATEMENT FROM HIM OR AN ADMISSION FROM HIM BUT

NONETHELESS, THE FACT THAT HE IS NO LONGER WORKING THERE IS A

VICTORY FOR NOT ONLY HACKETT, WHO IS PRODUCING THE SERIES MAN

IN THE HIGH CASTLE, BUT ALSO FOR OTHER WOMEN WHO WOULD HAVE TO

DEAL WITH HIM AS THE HEAD OF AMAZON STUDIOS.

TO SAY THAT IT IS POOR JUDGMENT AT LEAST IS

UNDERSTATING IT.

SHE SAYS NO THANK YOU, I HAVE A WIFE.

HE

GOES, YOU WILL LOVE MY DICK.

PROBABLY NOT.

THIS WAS

UNSOLICITED AND IT'S CLEAR SEXUAL HARASSMENT.

YOU HOLD A

POSITION OF POWER OVER HER.

YOU COULD GREENLIGHT FUTURE PROJECTS

ARE NOT.

SHE TOLD YOU SHE IS NOT INTERESTED IN YOU ARE STILL

PURSUING IT IN A GROSS WAY TO SAY THE LEAST.

SHE IS TOLD YOU

SHE HAS A WIFE.

A GOOD POINT, ON THE OTHER HAND,

IF YOU WEREN'T WORRIED ABOUT THE SEXUAL

HARASSMENT, ONE, YOU SHOULD BE. 2, I DON'T EVEN WANT TO GET INTO

WHETHER HE WAS DRUNK OR NOT DIET DOESN'T MATTER.

ITíS NOT AN

EXCUSE.

REALLY POOR JUDGMENT.

IT WAS POOR JUDGMENT ON HIS PART OF COURSE, BUT ISA HACKETT

WENT AND COMPLAINED ABOUT THIS TO AMAZON AND LET THEM KNOW WHAT

HAPPENED SO SHE DID REPORT IT IMMEDIATELY AND WHAT I FOUND

INTERESTING WAS SHE DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING FROM ANYONE FOLLOWING

HER REPORT, HOWEVER, HE WAS STILL EMPLOYED.

SHE JUST DIDN'T

SEE HIM AS ROUND AS MUCH AND DIDN'T HAVE DOOR WITH THEM AS

CLOSELY AS BEFORE.

AMAZON DIDN'T SUSPEND HIM UNTIL THE

HOLLYWOOD REPORTER REPORTED ON IT.

SO THEY WERE AWARE OF THESE

ALLEGATIONS WELL BEFORE THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER REPORTED ON

IT.

I'M SAYING THIS BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT TO KEEP IN MIND

THAT THESE TYPES OF THINGS OFTEN TIMES YOU GET REPORTED THAT

HIGHER UPS.

THEY GET REPORTED THAT HUMAN RESOURCES AND IT

SEEMS LIKE IT EITHER GETS BRUSHED UNDER THE RUG ARE THERE

MIGHT BE A SMALL CANDIDATE PLACED OVER A GUSTING WOUND AND

IN THIS CASE IT SEEMS LIKE THEY JUST PUT A BAND-AID OVER IT

UNTIL HACKETT WENT PUBLIC WITH WHAT HAPPENED AND PEOPLE

STARTED CRITICIZING AMAZON 4.

IT DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE IF THERE'S A SPOTLIGHT ON

SOMETHING.

OF COURSE.

SO THAT'S WHY THIS MOVEMENT IS SO IMPORTANT

BECAUSE IF YOU PUT A BIGGER SPOTLIGHT ON IT, IT'S GONNA MAKE

MEN WHO ARE PREDISPOSED TO DOING THIS A LITTLE MORE RELUCTANCE

AND SOME SMALL PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN AS WELL.

SOMEONE WHO

WORKS HERE ONCE TOLD THE STORY ON ERROR ABOUT HOW SHE WAS

SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY A FEMALE EXECUTIVE AND SO IT'S JUST, IT'S

MAINLY A POSITION OF POWER.

YES A HUGE PERCENTAGE OF MEN DO IT

BUT EITHER WAY, WE HAVE TO PUT A SPOTLIGHT ON IT SO PEOPLE

REALIZE THAT THEY CAN'T GET AWAY WITH IT ANYMORE.

For more infomation >> Amazon Executive: "You Will Love My D*ck" - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

How to Use Multiple Apps at Once on Android | Android Tips - Duration: 3:10.

How to Use Multiple Apps at Once on Android

Thanks for watching

Like , comment & must share this video

Also, SUBSCRIBE my YouTube channel

Get all the update notification form your account.

For more infomation >> How to Use Multiple Apps at Once on Android | Android Tips - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

ស្គរដៃ លេខ007 ប្រពន្ធស៊ីសៀង បុប្ផាព្រះវិហារ បាញ់កង្កែបត្រង់ អន្ទិតសិកថ្មី Romvong skor Dia khmer - Duration: 12:01.

Skor Dai

For more infomation >> ស្គរដៃ លេខ007 ប្រពន្ធស៊ីសៀង បុប្ផាព្រះវិហារ បាញ់កង្កែបត្រង់ អន្ទិតសិកថ្មី Romvong skor Dia khmer - Duration: 12:01.

-------------------------------------------

Pantera Negra (Black Panther) trailers 1 e 2 legendados - Duration: 3:59.

pantera negra trailer

black panther

black panther trailer

pantera negra,

pantera negra marvel

pantera negra filme

trailer pantera negra

pantera negra filme completo dublado

pantera negra filme completo dublado

pantera negra trailer marvel

pantera negra online

novo trailer pantera negra

trailers legendados

black panther trailer #1 (2018)

pantera negra trailer legendado

pantera negra trailer dublado

MakeYourChoice

For more infomation >> Pantera Negra (Black Panther) trailers 1 e 2 legendados - Duration: 3:59.

-------------------------------------------

កូនប្រសាលួចមាន់ ផៃ ផុងរ៉ាក់ កុំយកប្តីឆ្ងាយស្រុក ស្រណោះដើមធ្មៀរ-Romvong Skor Dai 2018 New Skor dia - Duration: 12:05.

Khmer Skor Dia

For more infomation >> កូនប្រសាលួចមាន់ ផៃ ផុងរ៉ាក់ កុំយកប្តីឆ្ងាយស្រុក ស្រណោះដើមធ្មៀរ-Romvong Skor Dai 2018 New Skor dia - Duration: 12:05.

-------------------------------------------

Halsey - Sorry (Karaoke Version 4k) - Karaoke Songs With Lyric - Duration: 4:19.

Halsey - Sorry (Karaoke Version 4k) - Karaoke Songs With Lyric

For more infomation >> Halsey - Sorry (Karaoke Version 4k) - Karaoke Songs With Lyric - Duration: 4:19.

-------------------------------------------

Jake Paul ft. Team 10 - It's Everyday Bro (Karaoke Version 4k) - Karaoke Songs With Lyric - Duration: 4:03.

Jake Paul ft. Team 10 - It's Everyday Bro (Karaoke Version 4k) - Karaoke Songs With Lyric