Youtube News: Youtube daily report w Jun 4 2018

It's thought the word heist came from the word "hoist," as in to lift something,

in this case to lift goods or money illegally.

We've already featured one of the biggest British heists, in the Hatton Garden jewel

burglary, mostly because it was a job done by old men.

Then you've got digital heists, such as the Russian Cobalt malware attacks.

It's said in each attack, they'd take around $12 million from a bank, but they did

this at around 100 banks.

You could call it the world's biggest heist, but it wasn't a one-time job, and anyway,

stealing via computer isn't as exciting as walking through the backdoor.

While French art thief Stéphane Breitwieser stole $1.4 billion dollars' worth of art

around 20 years ago, he did it over a long period of time, unlike the thieves we'll

talk about today, in this episode of the Infographics Show, Who was behind the half-billion-dollar

heist.

So, if we don't count cyber-heists and multiple thefts that occurred by one person or team

over a long period of time, we could say that the world's biggest heist is the focus of

the show we'll talk about today.

Ok, so some dude named Colonel Blood almost got away with stealing the Crown Jewels of

the English monarchy in the 1600s, but he didn't get away with it.

He even dropped the Sceptre of the Cross as he tried to escape, valued today at around

$550 million.

The entire Crown Jewels are said to be worth somewhere between 4 and 7 billion dollars

in today's money, so we could say that that robbery was the world's biggest, albeit

a short-lived one.

We also don't know what jewels he got and how much has been added to them since.

Blood was caught on the way out, not sitting at home fondling his jewels.

Ok, now that we we've told you that, we can probably say with confidence that the

biggest ever heist known to mankind was the Boston Museum heist that took place at the

city's Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum on March 18, 1990.

Unlike the Hatton Garden Heist, we can't really go into depth about what happened because

it remains a bit of a mystery and no one has ever been caught.

These thieves could be balling it in their mansions somewhere on a tropical island, enjoying

their bounty.

If they could sell the bounty, that is.

So, what did they do?

On the night of the robbery, two men disguised as policemen, walked up to the security guard

at the museum and told him they had been told to check-up on a disturbance that had been

reported.

The guard, Richard Abath, a 23-year old who had dreams of becoming a rock star, let them

in.

He was taped up and the thieves got to work stealing some of the greatest works of art

that have ever been created.

Of the time, Abath later said, "I was just this hippie guy who wasn't hurting anything,

wasn't on anybody's radar, and the next day I was on everybody's radar for the largest

art heist in history."

What's strange about the case is that police have a video in which the night before Abath

opens the door for an unidentified man.

Police think this could have been a rehearsal.

The question is, did Abath let the same guys in twice and not have anything to do with

it?

"I totally get it.

I understand how suspicious it all is," Abath said in an interview to the press in

2013.

But he said he wasn't involved.

"I know I wasn't supposed to let strangers into the museum after hours, but no one told

me what to do if the police showed up saying they were there to investigate a disturbance."

So, what happened when these thieves got inside?

Well, they stole 13 famous artworks.

The most missed of the paintings is arguably the 1633 painting by Dutch artist Rembrandt

van Rijn.

This is called "Christ in the Storm on the Lake of Galilee."

It's the artist's only seascape and it is thought to be worth around $100 million.

But a painting with an even higher value that was taken was Johannes Vermeer's "The

Concert", said to be worth $200 million.

Other great works included "La Sortie de Pesage" by Edgar Degas and "Landscape

with Obelisk" by Govert Flinck, as well as another two Rembrandts.

The thieves might have affected some of the paintings value, however.

Some of them were on permanent display and so couldn't just be taken down like a picture

from your wall.

The thieves had to cut some of the paintings from their frames, taking something away from

the original.

Still today those empty frames stand as a reminder of the heist.

The FBI has never even been close to finding those who took the paintings, even though

there is a $10 million reward if anyone can provide information to the whereabouts of

the masterpieces.

It's thought the paintings probably made their way to Connecticut or Philadelphia,

but right now police really have no idea where they are.

But can you even sell a painting that is so hot, who the hell would buy it?

According to the author Stephen Kurkjian, who wrote the book "Master Thieves: The

Boston Gangsters Who Pulled Off the World's Greatest Art Heist", the paintings were

just too valuable to be sold on.

He believes no collector would buy such works and that they were stolen for some other purpose.

What purpose?

That's the billion-dollar question.

There may be hope, and that comes in the form of a former mobster who was a convicted murderer,

among his many other crimes.

This 81-year old named Robert Gentile was secretly taped by the FBI saying that he had

two of the paintings from the heist.

He was jailed for the sale of guns to a murderer, and never said anything to police about the

paintings.

But why was the FBI secretly bugging him?

Because, after going through his home in 2012, they found a list of all the paintings written

by his hand, as well as what they were probably worth.

And guess what, the FBI also found a couple of police uniforms at his house.

While that sounds promising, art investigator Arthur Brand, a man who has been called "The

Indiana Jones of the Art World", said in 2017 that the works were no doubt in Ireland.

His investigation led him to the Irish Republican Army.

The robbery was also linked to mob associate Carmello Merlino, who police say had talked

about the paintings.

He was arrested for robbing an armoured car depot and then went and died in 2005.

So, he's not much use anymore.

It's thought his associates George Reissfelder and Leonard DiMuzio could have been the robbers.

The former died some time ago from a drug overdose and the latter was found full of

bullet holes a few years back.

Such is the life of crime, eh?

As it was in Boston, the FBI thought that if James "Whitey" Bulger wasn't directly

involved, then he must have known something about it.

If he does, he hasn't said anything.

Bulger is now 88 and serving time for 11 murders.

As for other mobsters, there's a loose theory that Mafia capo Vincent Ferrara might have

hired associate Robert Donati to steal the paintings to use as leverage to get him out

of prison.

Again, it's just a weak theory.

Could it really have been Abath; an inside job?

Could the hippy who often rolled into work stoned and drunk have gotten rid of those

masterpieces?

If so, the FBI has never been able to find anything, and no doubt Abath has been watched

and recorded.

The FBI did once tell him, "You know, we've never been able to eliminate you as a suspect."

It is a bit weird that Abath let some stranger in the night before, but you never know, it

could have been his dealer.

Another suspect is Brian McDevitt, a screenwriter who had once tried to rob the Hyde Collection

in Glen Falls, New York.

He had planned to knock out the security guard, tie him up with duct tape, and cut paintings

from their frames.

Hmm, sound similar?

Doesn't matter anyway, he also died young.

So, where do you think the paintings are, and who do you think could have taken them?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Also, be sure to check out our other video called What was it like to be jailed at Alcatraz?!

Thanks for watching, and, as always, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> Two Men Stole $500,000,000 Worth of Art - How Did They Do it? - Duration: 7:58.

-------------------------------------------

Focus Stacking: Two Minute Tips with David Bergman - Duration: 2:46.

So, did you ever shoot a close-up macro

image and have a hard time getting

everything in focus?

I certainly have. Come back after the

intro and we're going to talk about focus

stacking. The other day I was playing

around with a macro lens shooting

close-up images of everything. Macros

give you a much shallower depth of field

than a regular lens, so you just get a

sliver that's in focus, and everything

gets blurrier the further away it is

from the focus plane. It's a cool look

but a couple of times I wanted

everything in focus, from front to back

no problem right. Just close down my

aperture to f/32 and try again, but I found

the picture still wasn't ticky-tack

sharp, all the way through. That's when I

remembered a technique called focus

stacking, and I'm here to tell you it's

super easy to pull off. All you do is

shoot multiple overlapping images, with

different areas of the image and focus,

and then combine them all together in

the computer after the fact. There's a

few things you want to make sure to do.

Of course you should use a tripod, couple

of reasons. First the images all need to

be as close to lined up as possible.

It'll just make things easier in post.

But more importantly, if you use a low

ISO for highest image quality, then your

shutter speed might be kind of slow, and

you don't want any camera shake at all.

Another thing is that you want to use

manual exposure, so your pictures are the

same brightness, otherwise it'll get all

funky when you combine them. Lastly I

like to use the lenses sweet spot, which

is about 2 or 3 stops down from wide

open. Most lenses are sharpest right

there. So if you're using a 2.8 lens then

you want to be between 5.6 and f/8. Your

mileage may vary, but that's what you

should aim for. If sharpness is your goal.

So just start on the front, shoot a

picture, then change your focus to get

the next part in focus, and repeat over

and over, until you've covered the entire

subject in the computer. You can use

dedicated software to combine the images,

or just do what I do - use Photoshop!

Simply put all the images on separate

layers in one document, use the 'Auto

Align' command to make sure everything is

lined up, and then go to auto blend

layers, and pick stack images. If you're a

control freak, there are manual ways to

accomplish the same thing, but this is

Two Minute Tips after all,

and I don't have that kind of time!

Use the auto blend and you're done, and done

tack sharp, from front to back. So listen

I hope you're already subscribe to the

Adorama YouTube channel right? If not

click that button below and get on. In

here you'll get a new tip from me every

Monday at 11 a.m. Eastern and lots of

other free photo videos throughout the

whole week. Make sure you follow me on

social media @DavidBergman and maybe

I'll see you at a live talk or workshop soon!

See you later.

For more infomation >> Focus Stacking: Two Minute Tips with David Bergman - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

Anderea Bertolini about Robolaw: Liability, Insurance and Other Regulatory Challenges - Duration: 20:08.

So, moreover, I'm a lawyer, so everything goes against me.

So I'll be talking about the major regulatory challenges that relate to robotics regulation

and, of course, this is just a sample we could speak at length about them.

But these are really depressing issues and also the issues that the

European Parliament has directly addressed in its recommendations to the

European Commission and we're all awaiting the official statement of

the European Commission coming up later this month. So I will be discussing

why we need a European approach to robotics regulation. And I will point out

some of the reasons why European legal system not completely adequate or

largely inadequate and I will refer to some specific bodies of regulation.

I will propose an alternative approach which I like to call the risk management approach.

I'll briefly touch upon Robot testing which is a topical issue due to Fabio.

And, as more, insurance and the use of standartization and the purpose of

a potential European robotics agency.

So, first of all, why do we need to regulate robotics?

We need to regulate robotics because regulation is anyway, anyway there.

If we invented today the time machine that would already be regulated.

The only question is: "Is it good regulation or not for a time machine?".

If somebody used the time machine for attempt travel and got injured over his travel

and his family or himself wanted to sue the manufacturer

of the time machine in the court, the judge would simply have to find the solution.

And what he would do is apply existing regulation because it would not

be able to say: "There is no detailed regulation of time travel and, therefore,

I'm allowed not to judge the case".

So, this is a really important point

that I always try to make clear to engineers in particular,

because regulating doesn't mean necessarily limiting. Actually, it could

entail unleashing the full potential of innovation.

Why does that need to happen in EU level?

Because EU is one market, EU is one not only economic,

but also cultural area. And that's very important, because we value consumer

protection, we value human rights and we also want those principles that are very

dear to us to be deeply embedded in technological innovation.

And by regulating you make sure that it happens. So, you can conceive good regulation,

you can conceive that EU level to avoid fragmentation.

And this is a very important point both for businesses and for consumers.

But at the same time, you also want to regulate because you want to be sure that

you're embedding those fundamental values and principles into the technology you get.

And all my research shows that even very distant rules, such as liability rules,

have a very important bearing on the kind of technology that ultimately will emerge.

And, therefore, also on the incentives that are provided to manufacturers

and a kind of technology we get on our market. If we do not regulate,

if we let robotics emerge elsewhere outside of Europe,

it will embed those principles and those values and we might not like them.

And we'll still buy those devices and those products.

So, this is a really strategic issue for the EU not only on pure economic terms that are very relevant still,

but also on social and policy aspects and, in particular,

in the perspective of ensuring we get the technology we want.

We shall avoid fragmentation. So, what is happening, some member states are talking about

adopting their own rules on robotics and AI.

I'm thinking of Estonia I was...

There are some initiatives in Germany and one that is coming up in the UK with respect to driverless cars...

That may not be the best approach.

If we have... If the legal system deeply influences the way technology evolves,

we will get driveless cars that functions are slightly different in Germany and in the UK.

Is that acceptable? Most likely, not.

That's gonna harm our economy, that's gonna harm our industry.

So, we don't want fragmentation. We want legislation to occur at EU level.

The speaker just before me mentioned that

it will be very hard to spot where AI is. And this is the problem we already witness with the Internet.

So, fragmentation is really going in the opposite direction shall we

like member states should have that idea very clear in their mind.

How do you want to regulate robotics and technology in general?

You could say: "We have to stress, to identify those profile technical differences that

differentiate specific classes of application one from the other.

It makes no sense to attempt to regulate robotics as the whole

or to make the code of robotics to make the new ... of laws.

Driveless cars give rise to specific issues that are very different from those

that are triggered by drones, robot companions, softbots and surgical robots. Just to name a few.

So, you need to have a class by class application approach.

And also because similar technological trades may give rise to different legal, ethical and social issues.

So, you have to identify the specific societal impact of a single classes of applications.

Just the Rumba vacuum cleaner is an autonomous system,

but for sure it does not trigger the same issues that a driverless car or a drone does.

You know, so, it's not just autonomy or the ability to learn

that makes the difference is autonomy in the specific context

considering a specific kind of application in the specific setting.

At the same time, the same issue may require different solutions.

And we have to devise the right incentives

that we want to provide manufacturers, researchers, users of a specific technology.

So, the same solution may help you working for a robotic prostheses and a driverless car.

Just to keep with that one example.

Within this framework (this is like a methodological framework), how to address technology regulation.

Then we shall make one point very clear: robots are products.

They are no philosophical, no legal grounds to deem

or not even technological grants to deem that existing or reasonably foreseeable technologies.

They are subjects in an ontological sense, they are not beings - they are things.

And if they are things, they're given framework,

legislative framework applies to them. And that's the setting of product liability rules

and all the rules about standardization and CE Marking that EU level.

There's a number of European directives on those,

on the second aspect, plus the European product liability directive.

Now... So, this goes back to the story of the time travel.

Do these... Are these rules fit for purpose? This is a really relevant question.

And, well, this is a very long story, but, probably, the product liability regulation is not really fit for purpose.

Why is so? It's currently under revision.

And we will find out about the conclusions of the European Commission in a few days.

And very curious about that.

I was involved in the debate around product liability directive and I have to say that

there are two studies, they are very relevant studies, that were carried out

and found very little litigation with respect to product liability rules in Europe.

And that can be explained in different ways, but I will get back to that in a moment.

At the same time, for liability is an exposed solution.

When an accident occurs, it tells us who is going to be held liable

and, basically, holds the producer liable for all damages deriving from the use of their product.

Now except that there is an entirely different body of regulation

that is out of certification like so the different directives of the machinery directive, the medical device directive

and so on and so far, according to that kinds of products that we are considering.

And those high requirements at least that is the intention to make sure the products are safe.

And this should ... , but they do not exclude liability.

Now these... So, these two things work in parallel. But why is the product liability regulation, probably,

inadequate for the task of regulating emerging technologies?

Well, we have some impartial data about how it performed until today.

And we can slow litigation level which we see clearly that the causal nexus

between the fact and the damage is very hard to establish

for a claimant, somebody's seeking compensation.

We also see that the development risk defense is quite ineffective in its application.

Now I don't want to get too much into the legal details of them.

The reports will tell us more about it.

The data can be interpreted in different ways,

but if you speak to consumers' associations and if you look into

litigation involving medical products,

you see that it's very very hard for a claimant to get any sort of compensation.

And you can witness high level of randomness of career decisions and very little consumer protection.

Today in the morning I was reading an article in Financial Times and it was talking about

the intentionally EU of ensuring we reach better consumer protection in reality

and the importance of that. I think that we could take the example of

the product liability regulation into account as a very

good example of a body of regulation that is very well conceived theoretically.

But when it is applied it's very difficult to implement and to use it to successfully protect consumers.

And what are the inadequacies of the product liability directly with respect to emerging technology?

Well, originally, that body of regulation was understood

as a safety net intended to be applied and very exceptional circumstances.

Because safety is provided exactly through standardization.

However, close machine to human interaction and the case of the action

that involves the Uber driveless car just a few days back is a good example of that.

'cause these are two different bodies of regulations

to overlap traditional tort law and product liability regulation.

And so, basically, the product liability is going to serve purposes

for which it wasn't originally conceived.

And this will, you know, show even more its weaknesses and the uncertainties it gives rise to.

And at the same time, it really stresses the disproportion in the power

between businesses and consumer in undergoing a litigation.

So, this is a body of legislation that most likely needs to be profoundly revised.

And how could we do that? One way is (the one I propose) is through a risk management approach.

A risk management approach tries to burden

the party that is best positioned to minimize costs and acquire insurance.

Rather than the one that can be blamed for failing to comply with a specific standard.

It's basically grounded on absolute liability rules that are even

more than objective liability rules and does not always require establishing

a specific causal nexus which means pinpointing the one party that is liable up in the given accident.

And it should ensure prompt compensation to the victim

with very little, if any litigation at all.

Rather than a complex system that leading requires relevant litigation

to provide some compensation to the victim.

I'll provide you with one specific example.

That's of driveless cars again. We may decide to hold the producer liable

based on a risk management kind of consideration.

If we hold the producer liable based on a risk management approach,

we hold the producer liable in all cases: an autonomous or

semi-autonomous vehicle is involved in a crash.

What the producer will do is that he will acquire and insurance

and, most likely, because he won't purchase insurance for just one vehicle,

but for all the cars that he puts in production.

He will manage to explore economies of scale

that could be bad story for insurance companies, maybe.

But what he will do is that he will factor that cost into the cost function of his car

and then he will transfer that cost or a part of that cost onto the final user that purchases the vehicle.

So, it's not even the producer that ultimately bears the entire economic cost in such a scenario.

What happens when an accident occurs?

There is no need to show through complex litigation

that it was a defective design in the vehicle, that something went wrong,

that it's the fault of the manufacturer or of the internet service provider

or any other person involved in the completion of the driving task.

Because litigation is unnecessary,

it's the manufacturer that gonna be hold responsible and he's gonna have to pay.

What he can do then? Is that at the end of the year through contractual agreements

he can distribute this cost along the value chain to all the suppliers

that he might identify as the best part in position to either avoid that kind of accident,

or, anyway, responsible for that kind of occurrence.

So, at the end of the year a large manufacturer will be better positioned to say

in a hundred percent of cases, in... like... considering a hundred cases, in sixty cases

it was a matter of the Internet connection.

So, while I negotiate my agreement with an Internet connection provider for my connected vehicle,

I will take that into account and I will force them to internalise a part of that cost.

But at the end of the year he will have managed that cost,

minimized that cost and managed to avoid all litigation.

What is the major problem with a risk management approach?

As well we have to identify emerging risk.

And there are many risks that technologies will bring about

that we can hardly foretell as of today.

There will be a lot of cyber security issues.

We had an event here at the European Parliament just few weeks back

still organized by Mady Delvaux, where a cyber security expert made very clear of

how vulnerable many technologies are.

And that is again a problem of risk identification and regulation,

but also of technical regulations, so, standardization.

And we get back to that in a moment.

And then we need to assess such risk...

Yes, I'm almost done. And then we need to assess such risk,

because we also need to determine how likely it is that given harmful event will occur.

And that is not that obvious.

Because... We'll still stick with the example of driveless cars.

There is a study about rent from 2016 that says that with the given data we have today

we cannot say that driveless cars are safer than traditional vehicles.

And if we wanted to be based... to base that assumption on data,

we would have to wait 4 hundred more years. That, of course, is not possible.

But we have to invent new ways of testing. Some will be traditional ways of testing,

some of the through similar simulation but we also need Robo testing which is

the other aspect we need to regulate roboo testing and

other your other countries such as Japan are doing that effectively they organize

Taku zones there are areas where existing regulation is temporarily

discipline in order to allow experimentation under conditions of

safety this doesn't happen in Europe well most European countries have now

passed legislation to allow the testing of driverless cars on the road even if

they did not legislate autonomous driving which is good but this is it

probably largely insufficient because many other kind of technologies are not

easily tested we could think of drone swarms according to Italian legislation

you cannot for each drone in the air you have to have a pilot so that also

entails that you cannot test drawn swarms but that is useful technology and

do we have to change legislation today most likely not we have to wait until we

get data about how drone swarms work but in order to get that data we have to let

the testing happen so we need to do supply probably momentarily exist in

relation to that end what we need is also smart insurance it and so a new

approach to insurance that will be based on free flow of data most likely and by

design approaches but also in time contracting I explained this is a bit

complex but the idea is that all the data generated by our tools will help

insurance companies change their business models and calculate

internalize better the kind of the kind of risk we give rise to of course once a

privacy by design approach is respected so our data is kept sufficiently safe

and protected which is a problem in itself and then I said standardization

is necessary standardization is useful we need more and narrow tailored

technological standards for many issues one above all for instance cyber

security that are not sufficiently regulated and in particular that are not

sufficiently regulated with respect to robotics a

and emerging technologies and this is one of the reasons why we might benefit

of a European robotics agency that performs this specific task

now all these builds are part of knowledge that merges law economics

ethics and engineering and therefore we also need to train European lawyers and

engineers of tomorrow in that way and this is what we're trying to do at

Santana with also with my summer school and this is the third edition and so I

hope you're interested and if you want to ask some questions please don't

hesitate thank you

For more infomation >> Anderea Bertolini about Robolaw: Liability, Insurance and Other Regulatory Challenges - Duration: 20:08.

-------------------------------------------

Is Christianity Evidence Based? - Stephen Taylor vs. Karol Fjałkowski - Part 3 of 3 [PL SUB/NAPISY] - Duration: 47:32.

For more infomation >> Is Christianity Evidence Based? - Stephen Taylor vs. Karol Fjałkowski - Part 3 of 3 [PL SUB/NAPISY] - Duration: 47:32.

-------------------------------------------

Готовим вместе с Иришкой - Minecraft - Duration: 2:42.

For more infomation >> Готовим вместе с Иришкой - Minecraft - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

Toyota Yaris 1.3 16V VVT-I EXECUTIVE 5DRS AC/NAV/LMV/LEDER/31.000KM! - Duration: 1:12.

For more infomation >> Toyota Yaris 1.3 16V VVT-I EXECUTIVE 5DRS AC/NAV/LMV/LEDER/31.000KM! - Duration: 1:12.

-------------------------------------------

How to play piano for beginner

For more infomation >> How to play piano for beginner

-------------------------------------------

Al Bano e Romina Power insieme: tra loro il dramma di Ylenia Carrisi | K.N.B.T - Duration: 3:09.

For more infomation >> Al Bano e Romina Power insieme: tra loro il dramma di Ylenia Carrisi | K.N.B.T - Duration: 3:09.

-------------------------------------------

THIS IS BRAZIL - Duration: 2:06.

-Hands on your head, mother fucker! -Gun on the floor, sucker!

Pecanha, can I shoot him?

On the leg.

Ouch!

This mother fucker will never be dancing on parking lots again!

What the fuck? Is that a dance?

Go fuck yourself! He's on crack!

-He's high as fuck, Pecanha. -Hit him with the back of the gun.

Done. He's out.

Nice gold around his neck.

-Should I take it? -Take that shit.

He'll be dancing in Rickers.

That shit is Holy water!

What about you? You fucked up real bad too.

Mesquita, have you taken his guitar?

I've sold it already, Pecanha.

Fuck! That was quick.

Come on, Pecanha. What should we do with the guy on the hoodie?

The son of a bitch won't speak. He's an extra.

Take his kidney.

In times of truck drivers strike, a kidney's worth 2 gallons of gas.

Do you drink, man?

I'll take his liver too.

I'll take his liver, you take his kidney.

You're so fucking dumb.

That's not his liver, man. That's the kidney.

The liver is here, behind the ribs.

So you take the liver and I'll take the kidney.

Look.

Stay quiet. You'll feel just a pinch.

For more infomation >> THIS IS BRAZIL - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Terra da Padroeira | Cantinho do Cata-Vento: Dany e Diego - 03 de junho de 2018 - Duration: 24:04.

For more infomation >> Terra da Padroeira | Cantinho do Cata-Vento: Dany e Diego - 03 de junho de 2018 - Duration: 24:04.

-------------------------------------------

Ex-goleiro Sérgio vê falhas de Walter e Sidão em jogos do final de semana|n123snow - Duration: 3:26.

For more infomation >> Ex-goleiro Sérgio vê falhas de Walter e Sidão em jogos do final de semana|n123snow - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

Uomini e Donne, il mea culpa di Nilufar non è andato in onda per motivi tecnici - Duration: 4:10.

For more infomation >> Uomini e Donne, il mea culpa di Nilufar non è andato in onda per motivi tecnici - Duration: 4:10.

-------------------------------------------

Últimas notícia de hoje : Ex-presidente da Câmara, Eduardo Cunha recebe nova condenação - Duration: 4:18.

For more infomation >> Últimas notícia de hoje : Ex-presidente da Câmara, Eduardo Cunha recebe nova condenação - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

VLOG# WE WENT TO BOSNIA FROM CROATIA BY A CAR! - Duration: 10:33.

For more infomation >> VLOG# WE WENT TO BOSNIA FROM CROATIA BY A CAR! - Duration: 10:33.

-------------------------------------------

Árbitro termina o jogo com bola dentro da área e revolta corintianos|x3and1baller - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> Árbitro termina o jogo com bola dentro da área e revolta corintianos|x3and1baller - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

Dani Alves foi oferecido ao Sevilla e pode deixar o PSG, diz jornal|x3and1baller - Duration: 1:26.

For more infomation >> Dani Alves foi oferecido ao Sevilla e pode deixar o PSG, diz jornal|x3and1baller - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse E 220 d Limousine Automaat Lease Edition | COMAND - Duration: 0:53.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse E 220 d Limousine Automaat Lease Edition | COMAND - Duration: 0:53.

-------------------------------------------

Quais são as características principais do mundo contemporâneo? - Duration: 3:43.

For more infomation >> Quais são as características principais do mundo contemporâneo? - Duration: 3:43.

-------------------------------------------

BURAK MEMİŞ ' E BASKIN YAPTIK ! - Vlog - Duration: 10:19.

For more infomation >> BURAK MEMİŞ ' E BASKIN YAPTIK ! - Vlog - Duration: 10:19.

-------------------------------------------

Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse E 200 Estate Automaat Avantgarde | Navi | LED | Camera - Duration: 1:07.

For more infomation >> Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse E 200 Estate Automaat Avantgarde | Navi | LED | Camera - Duration: 1:07.

-------------------------------------------

8 segni che le tue arterie sono ostruite e come risolvere il problema - Italy 365 - Duration: 4:29.

For more infomation >> 8 segni che le tue arterie sono ostruite e come risolvere il problema - Italy 365 - Duration: 4:29.

-------------------------------------------

✅ Filho de Pedro Bial e Giulia Gam surpreende em show intimista no Rio de Janeiro - Duration: 1:40.

Na noite deste domingo, 3, Theo, filho de Pedro Bial e Giulia Gam, se apresentou em uma casa de shows no Rio de Janeiro

Cantor e compositor, o jovem entoou algumas canções de seu novo EP, Presente, já disponível nas plataformas digitais

Com estilo musical entre MPB, reggae e surf music, o jovem surpreendeu a plateia e mostrou que herdou o DNA artístico dos pais famosos

Paulo Betti e a namorada, Dadá Coelho, prestigiaram o evento. "Showzaço. Quanta poesia, ritmo, malemolência

Saí de lá tagarelando pro Paulo que acho que um dos artigos da Declaração Universal dos Direitos do Homem deveria dizer que todo ser humano tem o direito de ver ao menos uma vez na vida o show de Theozin", brincou Dadá

Corujas, Pedro e Giulia, que foram casados entre 1998 e 2000, não estiveram presentes, mas fizeram questão de divulgar durante a semana o show do herdeiro nas redes sociais

Priscila Fantin curte férias em Miami

For more infomation >> ✅ Filho de Pedro Bial e Giulia Gam surpreende em show intimista no Rio de Janeiro - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Georgette Polizzi e la lettera a Davide Tresse: 'Non l'ho lasciato, era una dedica' - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> Georgette Polizzi e la lettera a Davide Tresse: 'Non l'ho lasciato, era una dedica' - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

Fresh Skin Tutorial - TV Beauté | Vic Ceridono - Duration: 9:12.

For more infomation >> Fresh Skin Tutorial - TV Beauté | Vic Ceridono - Duration: 9:12.

-------------------------------------------

RESPONDENDO HATERS: COPA DO MUNDO E SELEÇÃO BRASILEIRA - Duration: 3:47.

For more infomation >> RESPONDENDO HATERS: COPA DO MUNDO E SELEÇÃO BRASILEIRA - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

✅ Il Segreto: Severo arrestato e accusato di omicidio - Duration: 3:24.

Anticipazioni Il Segreto: Severo sequestra Venancia e poi viene arrestato Nelle prossime puntate de Il Segreto, Severo si ritrova ancora ad affrontare delle tragedia

Come vi abbiamo già anticipato, il piccolo Carmelito scompare. Dopo qualche tempo, Candela comprende che dietro la sua sparizione c'è proprio Venancia

Così, la pasticcera fa di tutto pur di salvare il figlio. Affrontando l'ex suocera, la moglie di Severo perde la vita

Il Santacruz, ovviamente, non riesce ad accettare la morte della moglie ed è disposto a tutto pur di vendicarla

Ma prima deve mantenere un'importante promessa fatta proprio a Candela: deve trovare Carmelito

Per raggiungere questo obbiettivo si ritrova costretto a sequestrare Venancia. Quest'ultima non ha alcuna intenzione di rivelare al Santacruz la posizione di suo figlio

Anzi, continua a prendersi gioco di lui. Sappiamo che l'ex suocera di Candela ha una gravissima malattia

Venancia ha pochi giorni di vita e Severo è consapevole di questo dettaglio, tanto che fa di tutto pur di farla parlare prima che sia troppo tardi

Ma la situazione sfugge di mano al Santacruz. Il Segreto anticipazioni: Venancia muore, Severo sconvolto Severo sequestra Venancia e le chiede di confessare dove si trova Carmelito

Un pomeriggio esce dal rifugio per fare una passeggiata con Carmelo. Al suo ritorno trova l'ex suocera di Candela morta

Dunque, il Santacruz non sa dove si trova suo figlio e senza Venancia potrebbero non scoprirlo mai

Intanto, lo scheriffo Meliton Melquiades inizia a insospettirsi di fronte alla sparizione di Venancia e Severo

Quest'ultimo dichiara di aver lasciato Puente Viejo per andare a trovare Lucas. Così, lo sceriffo pensa bene a telefonare il dottore per scoprire la verità

Fortunatamente, l'uomo finge e conferma la versione dell'amico. Severo appare spiazzato di fronte alla morte di Venancia

Seguendo il consiglio di Carmelo, prepara una fossa per seppellire il cadavere. Anticipazione Il Segreto: Severo in carcere con l'accusa di tentato omicidio Meliton riesce a trovare il posto, insieme ad altri membri della guardia civile, prima ancora dell'occultamento del cadavere di Venancia

Ora lo sceriffo è costretto ad accusare ufficialmente Severo di tentato omicidio, trasferendolo in carcere

Dalle anticipazioni sappiamo che il Santacruz viene anche condannato a morte.

For more infomation >> ✅ Il Segreto: Severo arrestato e accusato di omicidio - Duration: 3:24.

-------------------------------------------

Spaghetti al pesto di peperoni e noci - ⏳ pronta in 15 min - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> Spaghetti al pesto di peperoni e noci - ⏳ pronta in 15 min - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

Dacia Dokker 1.5 dCi Ambiance (Airco/R.schuifdeur) - Duration: 1:04.

For more infomation >> Dacia Dokker 1.5 dCi Ambiance (Airco/R.schuifdeur) - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

Two Men Stole $500,000,000 Worth of Art - How Did They Do it? - Duration: 7:58.