SVT ask themselves if racial segregation can be a good thing.
Melanin is a new show from the Education Radio about what it's like to be a young Afro-Swede.
I saw this on TV a while back, and despite all the biased nonsense I've seen from SVT I was still astonished.
This is an uncritical report on how "separatism" is good, and they also advertise the hate organisation BLM.
Don't miss this video where I destroy BLM:s reasons for existing, it clarifies how insane the show Melanin is.
The question asked in the show is: "How can you make a difference in society?"
The answer they give: "Isolate yourself from whites. Only hang out with radicals who re-affirm your delusions."
"And delude yourself that blacks are oppressed, in this country where Timbuktu makes millions per year."
Experiencing something alone can be very tough.
When you're the only black person in a context, and you hear something racist,
you might feel you have to excuse yourself and explain why you become upset.
Many say separatism is a good solution to those situations.
What's "separatism"?
It's when you only include blacks into the conversation.
I GET IT
It sounds good, so you can talk up together and share experiences, thoughts.
It's also bad, because whites should be allowed to join and hear what blacks go through.
It would be a lesson for whites.
They shouldn't offer opinions and talk on our behalf, but had they been there they could understand what we mean with our stories.
I've seen such organisations to empower blacks and let them talk, without whites that don't understand and say stuff.
There might be quarrel when white people be like "You can't blame all white people for that".
"Maybe white people don't understand"
This show is aimed at young people, and the message is:
"WHITE PEOPLE DON'T LIKE YOU. THEY WANNA HARM YOU."
"And that's why you need separate safe spaces"
"BECAUSE WHITES WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND YOU"
I don't find this constructive.
It's interesting how the only critical voice they managed to find was:
"It's okay that all-black groups meet, but whites should be there too, and shut up, so they can learn."
I'm not against the concept of listening to each other, it's the basis of a democratic conversation.
But you don't want a democratic conversation. You just want white people to shut up and accept anything.
And that's problematic considering that the definition of racism is fucked apart.
Everything is racist today. Remember when the "Organisation of Afro-Swedes" criticized a bakery for racism and post-colonialism?
Even though they had whites as cookies too.
Then there's the whole "China Puff" controversy, that was a thing.
Or why not that time band-aids were racist?
I've done a video previously on crazy black girls screaming on a train, because a woman asked them to keep their volume down. That was "racism".
Are we just supposed to listen to this bullshit without being allowed to ask questions?
Isn't it good if someone can destroy your delusions?
To sum it up, every criticism towards a person that happens to be black can be interpreted as racism, even when it's not aimed at the skin colour.
Therefore it's problematic to say that whites should only listen, because it enables stupidity.
And it would be good if someone could destroy your illusions of oppression, so you can stop ruining for yourself.
And stop trying to prevent blacks from succeeding in life.
I understand that rage feels good, pushing away responsibility and guilt, not having to work on yourself.
It feels nice not having to deal with your defects, no need to fight and struggle.
But it's not healthy in the long run.
Another thing is that whites can also have experiences with racism,
and if people actually have conversations, instead of one part just listening,
You can discover that you had more in common than you thought. And how stupid prejudice are on a wider level.
Whether skin colour, political orientation or clothing style.
But I already know what some of you gonna say: "RACISM AGAINST WHITES DOESNT EXIST"
"A minority can't oppress a majority!"
According to that logic apartheid wasn't racist, because 20% were oppressing 80%.
And minorities can't oppress majorities.
This also means the rich can't oppress the poor, since the working class are a majority.
It's fantastic how politically correct logic always stumbles on itself.
Like having to respect peoples identities. So the Islamic State are real muslims, because they say that they are!
And if you really feel you're a 12-year old cat, of course you should be allowed to fuck cats.
I don't wanna keep you from expressing your identity.
Separatism feels nice. Imagine being black amongst other blacks and talking without having to explain.
I wonder why so many are upset by it?
How many whites would wanna show up and just listen?
People listen to you all the time. They just don't agree.
And that's what you wanna avoid. You demand privileges that no person has.
Whites are questioned all the time, we don't demand safe spaces.
Separatism is controversial, but what is it used for other than feeling unity?
It's interesting how you didn't include that nazis give their full support to these ideas.
When SSU arranged a separatist meeting a while back, it was celebrated by nazis
who felt that this racial focus will make it easier for everyone to divide themselves according to race eventually.
And it's just funny that the guilt-by-association media isn't reacting much here.
When the Moderate Party wanna cooperate with SD, the left complains about "legitimizing racism".
But when nazis legitimize separatism, that doesn't count?
It's also interesting how SVT don't wanna legitimize the Sweden Democrats ideas, but the Nordic Resistence Movements racial segregation is fine.
During the debate, Mattias Karlsson attacked the right-wing governments policies.
Among other things he said that: "You let in tens of thousands of potential sex offenders and terrorists."
This statement is generalizing towards refugees,
it violates the principle of "equal human worth", and so SVT Aktuellt wants to distance themselves from it.
When I criticized the show they replied saying that: "Sometimes you wanna discuss with those who've had similar experiences."
"It's not about people being different, everyones equal worth still applies!
To which I replied: "Why don't you interview a white nationalist who feels the same way?"
"If you're spat on, hated and bullied just because you're a white Swede in a ghetto then you probably feel the same type of hate, and seek like-minded for understanding."
No reply there.
That whole "white privilege, whites should be quiet"-culture dehumanizes white people.
And I know some laugh, saying: "You can't dehumanize whites. They have structural power."
A retarded white teenager was kidnapped and tortured for 48 hours
It was livestreamed on Facebook so people could see him being abused, while they shouted: "Fuck white people!" and "Fuck Trump!"
What is that, if not dehumanization?
3 Arabs tried to rob a homeless Swede. When a man with crutches came walking and told them to stop
he got his ass kicked while they shouted that "Swedes are racist", "fucking Swede" and "I'm muslim, fuck Swedes!"
When a muslim woman was asked for her ticket, this man got so offended he wondered if the conducter is racist.
When two men tried to calm him down, he ended up assaulting and stabbing one of them 4 times, so he got life-threatening injuries.
After this he strutted around the train like he'd won SM-gold, and asked several passengers if they're racists.
And when caught by police he said he's proud of having stood up for this girl.
That he was high on benzo is probably relevant to his behavior on the train, but I can't help wondering:
Where did the perpetrator get his perception of reality? That everything is racist, everyone are racists, and that racism must be fought by all means necessary.
A principal in Sweden got death threats because she's white, after the organisation of Afro-Swedes
held a lecture where they race-baited against "white colonizers", meaning anyone with a power position even if it's something measly like "principal".
One might wonder where this will end.
Shouldn't you consider your responsibility for the culture you create, and the image you're broadcasting?
And if you wanna decrease racism, why create organisations where you exclude people based on skin colour?
I think Morgan Freeman had good things to say about this.
Some separatist movements wanna create a safe space to talk in private.
The goal is to change society. Activists often act outside of politics. The methods can be calm, yet illegal.
Here's examples of blacks that have improved lives for blacks over the world.
Nelson Mandela from South Africa who fought to abolish apartheid.
Rosa Parks from USA who refused to move for a white on the bus.
Black Lives Matter, who organized against the lethal police violence in America.
Why are you putting BLM in the same context as Rosa Parks or Nelson Mandela?
The latter two fought for rights in a time when blacks didn't have rights.
BLM fight for rights in a time when blacks have rights. They want special rights, not equal rights.
So that's BLM in Seattle.
The founder of BLM Toronto says that whites are a genetic defect,
and that they're subhumans worth less than blacks.
Y'all in public service criticize the Sweden Democrats for their ideological roots, so I feel you can do the same here
because this is far from the only disgusting thing with this racist shit organisation.
They've also started numerous riots.
if BLM is against racism, they should stop giving people reasons to become racist.
Because their behavior doesn't disprove the stereotype of blacks as violent and irrational.
This is so damn perverse.
Blacks throughout history have fought to escape "separatism", and now some spoiled Afro-Swedes wanna enforce it again?
So if you advocate apartheid and racial segregation you're racist,
but if you just change the name and call it "separatism" you're pro-equality?
This is a prime example of how sick the Left has become.
You invent new words for old ideas, and it's the same ideas you claim to oppose.
Racism is separatism. Gender discrimination is affirmative action. Censorship is interpretation priority.
Intolerance is tolerance, ignorance is strength, and freedom is slavery.
Once upon a time antiracists claimed that apartheid is something bad that must be abolished.
Now they say: "But if we don't fix apartheid, how are the niggers gonna get some space?"
It's not weird that immigrants in Sweden feel outcast, when the media tries to radicalize them through activists of offense.
When UR were looking for a producer, they advertised for someone who has "experiences of being racialized as Afro-Swede".
This is code for: "Hej! We want an offended housenigger who can fulfill the requirements for victim."
"So we can sell the narrative of white rulers."
Feel free to bring a piece of chicken or watermelon as long as we're doing stereotypes.
You're really trying to find a radical.
Just take the word "racialized", ordinary people don't know what the fuck it means.
So it's obvious you tried attracting people from the left.
"UR:s mission is to reflect all of Sweden and Melanin is about depicting what it's like to be a young Afro-Swede."
If you wanna depict all of Sweden, why only include people who think the same way?
I don't buy that blacks are walking offense-robots.
How do you think that blacks who don't agree with separatism feel?
How do you think those who don't buy rabid identity politics feel, when these morons get to claim represent for all blacks without being questioned.
There's definitely a lot of racism in the LGBT-world. Just take queer, that word...
It's associated with whiteness. White middle class.
Exotification is large. It's mostly comments you get that are supposed to be compliments. Positive racism, but it's still racism.
This just shows the disgusting view public service has on black people.
You haven't grasped something so basic as that blacks aren't a homogenous group. They have different opinions.
And even if they can have similar experiences in life, they can draw different conclusions from these experiences.
You haven't displayed diversity. You've just given a voice to the radicals, which only contributes to prejudice.
"We strenghten each other! By constantly talking about how society breaks us down, and how we can't get anywhere because of whitey keeping us down."
"So that's why we need quotas, welfare, and increased representation - but no cops!"
Why encourage offense, when you could encourage personal responsibility and entrepreneurship?
All you're doing is enslaving black people in a victim-mentality that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Instead of offended morons SVT could've shown off positive black role models, that see themselves as more than a shitty skin colour.
People who believe in personal drive when you face adversity in life, like Free Hugs Guy, Morgan Freeman, Neil Degrasse Tyson,
or black scientists and intellectuals, how many even know of these?
The only thing the media teaches you now is that you can get public funding if you bitch about words like "negro ball" (a chocolate ball)
Reminds me of the time TV4 invited two BLM-activists to advertise their podcast.
These girls were in another episode of Melanin, of course.
Tilde asked what situations they've been in that white people don't have to deal with.
The reply she got is that her question retracts the conversation and is demeaning, because they've already said racism exists. And that's enough.
These girls get offended by even having the chance to a conversation on TV.
These are the type of people Melanin choose as representatives for blacks, and it shows how spoiled Black Power-activists are.
They even got so offended by a reasonable question, that they had to fret it in a mail to TV4 afterwards.
It's obvious not everyone has the same perspective and experiences,
therefore it's important to be over-explicit and concrete in your conversations with adversaries.
If you're not willing to do that, you're not willing to establish understanding.
Black activists don't want understanding. They want submission. That's why they talk about "interpretative prerogative ".
I've never been invited to TV4 and I'm bigger than this piss pod, so it's interesting how media works.
They never wanna show grateful immigrants who have good things to say about Sweden.
All they display are spoiled spazzes that accuse Swedes of unconscious racism.
And then they're surprised that people get a bad view of immigrants?
All the media promotes is houseniggers who are happy to play "offended slave", to satisfy the journalists smug self-image as benevolent colonizers.
When BLM are sponsored by George Soros you really should ponder whose useful idiot you are.
WHITENESS PRIVILEGE
Privilege. Something none of us have.
Or am I wrong? Do you? You're the whitest here.
If there's a club you know you're not getting into, you don't go there. What about jobs? Does it work the same?
What's common is that you must think before.
Let's say you're a white man, the easiest thing to be.
Then you're just like: Oh well it's not a thing if I want a job, I'll just apply and see if I get it.
But if you're black you gotta think before hand and twitch it a little.
Re-think and prepare before you apply.
You gotta be strategic and look for an opening.
These guys think whites just do whatever the fuck they want all day long.
Any club - you're in. Any job - it's yours.
like the easiest is
They claim that white male is the easiest to be.
How do you know? You're so certain whites can't grasp what it's like to be black, so how can blacks know what it's like to be white?
Either we can emphatize to each others situation, or we can't. You say we can't.
So interpretation prerogative doesn't add up.
It's so obvious that you elevate whiteness to some utopian dream where none of your problems exist.
Talk about a mind-ghost. I'ma let one of my followers finish this one:
"As a privileged white male I applied for hundreds of jobs over 2 years before I got anything. Maybe I should think about how "easy" I had it."
Maybe there's racism, but no real racism in Sweden
My friend is black, I can't be racist
What's in your bag, a bomb?
Beyonce didn't have any white dancers, that's racist!
What, I can't see skin colour?
That's not racism, it's just ignorance. She means well.
What are you trying to say by illustrating an execution of white people, while blacks line up pseudo-racist things that whites have said?
Should public service teach young people to hate whites, and despise their host nation?
Having said all this, I don't care if some nutjobs grab a coffee, whether white racists or black racists.
What annoys me is when public service media advertises it, and broadcasts this stupidity across the nation.
Just look at their youtube-channel where they post their TV shows
"Sometimes I laugh at gay jokes." "Is it okay to say hen or them?" "Is it okay to say handicapped?"
Yes you can, you fucking retard.
We're forced to pay for this shit that most of us haven't ordered.
Who can claim that public service is politically neutral?
My channel is full of examples of the opposite.
Serious studies show the opposite, and nobody other than the Green Party thinks public service is neutral.
Public service should be abolished and converted into a private company that owns its bias.
They should absolutely not be allowed tax money to conduct the lowest form of political opinion.
Their analysis is on kindergarten-level and accomplishes nothing but polarization. So "think again"
I can still be yo nigga even if I'm white?
No comments:
Post a Comment